Oops in 2.2.17

2001-01-20 Thread James Brents
Using 2.2.17 kernel that is standard other than the bridging firewall patch, this Oops happened while setting up tripwire - it was scanning the disk and then locked up. As its purely a remote machine, I am only able to go off of the logs in syslogd. Below is the ksymoops report. If im leaving

Oops in 2.2.17

2001-01-20 Thread James Brents
Using 2.2.17 kernel that is standard other than the bridging firewall patch, this Oops happened while setting up tripwire - it was scanning the disk and then locked up. As its purely a remote machine, I am only able to go off of the logs in syslogd. Below is the ksymoops report. If im leaving

Difficult to diagnose oops in 2.2.17, details at www.aeinet.com/oops

2000-12-10 Thread Johnathan Corgan
(Please cc: me directly if you so choose, I am not subscribed to l-k at the moment. Thanks. Otherwise, I'll follow the thread in a l-k archive.) All, I'd like to enlist your help in diagnosing a series of oopsen over the last eight weeks. I didn't start tracking the problem in detail until a

Difficult to diagnose oops in 2.2.17, details at www.aeinet.com/oops

2000-12-10 Thread Johnathan Corgan
(Please cc: me directly if you so choose, I am not subscribed to l-k at the moment. Thanks. Otherwise, I'll follow the thread in a l-k archive.) All, I'd like to enlist your help in diagnosing a series of oopsen over the last eight weeks. I didn't start tracking the problem in detail until a

Re: Reproducable oops in 2.2.17 and 2.2.18pre21

2000-11-17 Thread J . A . Magallon
On Fri, 17 Nov 2000 14:49:38 Rasmus Andersen wrote: > Hi. > > I get an oops reproducably with 2.2.17 and 2.2.18pre21 on a stock RH 6.2 > system. I cannot trigger it with the RH supplied kernel (2.2.14-5.0). > I also got it with 2.2.17pre10 which prompted me to upgrade the kernel

Re: Reproducable oops in 2.2.17 and 2.2.18pre21

2000-11-17 Thread Marcelo Tosatti
On Fri, 17 Nov 2000, Rasmus Andersen wrote: > Hi. > > I get an oops reproducably with 2.2.17 and 2.2.18pre21 on a stock RH 6.2 > system. I cannot trigger it with the RH supplied kernel (2.2.14-5.0). > I also got it with 2.2.17pre10 which prompted me to upgrade the kernel

Reproducable oops in 2.2.17 and 2.2.18pre21

2000-11-17 Thread Rasmus Andersen
Hi. I get an oops reproducably with 2.2.17 and 2.2.18pre21 on a stock RH 6.2 system. I cannot trigger it with the RH supplied kernel (2.2.14-5.0). I also got it with 2.2.17pre10 which prompted me to upgrade the kernel. I initially suspected bad RAM but have exchanged the RAM with memtest86'ed

Reproducable oops in 2.2.17 and 2.2.18pre21

2000-11-17 Thread Rasmus Andersen
Hi. I get an oops reproducably with 2.2.17 and 2.2.18pre21 on a stock RH 6.2 system. I cannot trigger it with the RH supplied kernel (2.2.14-5.0). I also got it with 2.2.17pre10 which prompted me to upgrade the kernel. I initially suspected bad RAM but have exchanged the RAM with memtest86'ed

Re: Reproducable oops in 2.2.17 and 2.2.18pre21

2000-11-17 Thread Marcelo Tosatti
On Fri, 17 Nov 2000, Rasmus Andersen wrote: Hi. I get an oops reproducably with 2.2.17 and 2.2.18pre21 on a stock RH 6.2 system. I cannot trigger it with the RH supplied kernel (2.2.14-5.0). I also got it with 2.2.17pre10 which prompted me to upgrade the kernel. I initially suspected bad

Re: Reproducable oops in 2.2.17 and 2.2.18pre21

2000-11-17 Thread J . A . Magallon
On Fri, 17 Nov 2000 14:49:38 Rasmus Andersen wrote: Hi. I get an oops reproducably with 2.2.17 and 2.2.18pre21 on a stock RH 6.2 system. I cannot trigger it with the RH supplied kernel (2.2.14-5.0). I also got it with 2.2.17pre10 which prompted me to upgrade the kernel. I initially

Re: oops in 2.2.17, not in 2.2.14-5

2000-11-14 Thread Rasmus Andersen
> > OK, I tried with 2.2.16 and 2.2.18pre21 compiled with egcs-2.91.66 > (the kernels reported yesterday were compiled with 2.95.2). > > 2.2.16 oopsed faithfully (I could not get hold of the oops as several > scrolled by and none made it to the log). 2.2.18pre21 does not oops. > Bzip2 core

Re: oops in 2.2.17, not in 2.2.14-5

2000-11-14 Thread Rasmus Andersen
> I get this also with 2.2.17pre10 (which was what I was running before > encountering this) but not with the stock RH 6.2 kernel (2.2.14-5.0). > Unless I get other suggestions I'm going to try with the latest 2.2.18pre > and 2.2.16 tomorrow. > OK, I tried with 2.2.16 and 2.2.18pre21 compiled

Re: Oops on 2.2.17 [klogd bonus question]

2000-11-14 Thread Rasmus Andersen
On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 11:10:08PM -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote: > > [Rasmus Andersen] > > I'm getting oopses on a linux 2.2.17 box when I try to do > > tar cvIf -X /. Reproducably. > > Are you excluding /proc? Trying to back up all of /proc is definitely > asking for trouble, although the

Re: Oops on 2.2.17 [klogd bonus question]

2000-11-14 Thread Rasmus Andersen
On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 11:10:08PM -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote: [Rasmus Andersen] I'm getting oopses on a linux 2.2.17 box when I try to do tar cvIf file -Xfile /. Reproducably. Are you excluding /proc? Trying to back up all of /proc is definitely asking for trouble, although the

Re: oops in 2.2.17, not in 2.2.14-5

2000-11-14 Thread Rasmus Andersen
I get this also with 2.2.17pre10 (which was what I was running before encountering this) but not with the stock RH 6.2 kernel (2.2.14-5.0). Unless I get other suggestions I'm going to try with the latest 2.2.18pre and 2.2.16 tomorrow. OK, I tried with 2.2.16 and 2.2.18pre21 compiled with

Re: oops in 2.2.17, not in 2.2.14-5

2000-11-14 Thread Rasmus Andersen
OK, I tried with 2.2.16 and 2.2.18pre21 compiled with egcs-2.91.66 (the kernels reported yesterday were compiled with 2.95.2). 2.2.16 oopsed faithfully (I could not get hold of the oops as several scrolled by and none made it to the log). 2.2.18pre21 does not oops. Bzip2 core dumps, but

Re: Oops on 2.2.17 [klogd bonus question]

2000-11-13 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Rasmus Andersen] > I'm getting oopses on a linux 2.2.17 box when I try to do > tar cvIf -X /. Reproducably. Are you excluding /proc? Trying to back up all of /proc is definitely asking for trouble, although the oops still indicates a kernel bug. Peter - To unsubscribe from this list: send

Re: Oops on 2.2.17 [klogd bonus question]

2000-11-13 Thread Marcelo Tosatti
On Mon, 13 Nov 2000, Rasmus Andersen wrote: > Hi. > > I'm getting oopses on a linux 2.2.17 box when I try to do > tar cvIf -X /. Reproducably. This works fine > for the std. RH 6.2 kernel (2.2.14-5). The resulting file > is about 20MB. > > I would submit the oops, but it is run through

oops in 2.2.17, not in 2.2.14-5

2000-11-13 Thread Rasmus Andersen
Hi. When running 'tar cvIf /' or 'tar cvzf /' (but sometimes not with 'plain' tar, i.e., without compression) I get an oops after some time. This is reproducible. The oops below is from a 'tar cvIf' run. I get this also with 2.2.17pre10 (which was what I was running before encountering this)

Oops on 2.2.17 [klogd bonus question]

2000-11-13 Thread Rasmus Andersen
Hi. I'm getting oopses on a linux 2.2.17 box when I try to do tar cvIf -X /. Reproducably. This works fine for the std. RH 6.2 kernel (2.2.14-5). The resulting file is about 20MB. I would submit the oops, but it is run through klogd and I seem to remember people expressing dissatisfaction

oops in 2.2.17, not in 2.2.14-5

2000-11-13 Thread Rasmus Andersen
Hi. When running 'tar cvIf file /' or 'tar cvzf file /' (but sometimes not with 'plain' tar, i.e., without compression) I get an oops after some time. This is reproducible. The oops below is from a 'tar cvIf' run. I get this also with 2.2.17pre10 (which was what I was running before

Re: Oops on 2.2.17 [klogd bonus question]

2000-11-13 Thread Marcelo Tosatti
On Mon, 13 Nov 2000, Rasmus Andersen wrote: Hi. I'm getting oopses on a linux 2.2.17 box when I try to do tar cvIf file -Xfile /. Reproducably. This works fine for the std. RH 6.2 kernel (2.2.14-5). The resulting file is about 20MB. I would submit the oops, but it is run through

Re: Oops on 2.2.17 [klogd bonus question]

2000-11-13 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Rasmus Andersen] I'm getting oopses on a linux 2.2.17 box when I try to do tar cvIf file -Xfile /. Reproducably. Are you excluding /proc? Trying to back up all of /proc is definitely asking for trouble, although the oops still indicates a kernel bug. Peter - To unsubscribe from this list:

Oops on 2.2.17 (and 2.2.18pre20)

2000-11-10 Thread Magnus Naeslund\(b\)
Hello i got me several nasty oopses on my heavily loaded webserver. [1.] One line summary of the problem: I get a oops that seems to generate more oops. My logs are full of them bastards. I hate them. GRRR. [2.] Full description of the problem/report: I recently upgraded my box to 1GB of mem,

Oops in 2.2.17

2000-10-29 Thread Igor Kolomiets
Today I've found the following in my /var/log/messages: Oct 28 20:14:36 some_host kernel: kmem_free: Bad obj addr (objp=c2b381e0, name=size-64) Oct 28 20:14:36 some_host kernel: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address Oct 28 20:14:36 some_host kernel:

Oops in 2.2.17

2000-10-29 Thread Igor Kolomiets
Today I've found the following in my /var/log/messages: Oct 28 20:14:36 some_host kernel: kmem_free: Bad obj addr (objp=c2b381e0, name=size-64) Oct 28 20:14:36 some_host kernel: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address Oct 28 20:14:36 some_host kernel:

[OOPS] with 2.2.17+ide+ext3

2000-10-23 Thread Steven Walter
Casually browsing through my system logs, I came upon this two oopses that happened together (logged as same second). I don't really remember what situation was surrounding, or even if any interruption was experienced. The system did totally freeze just under 30 minutes later, however, with no

[OOPS] with 2.2.17+ide+ext3

2000-10-23 Thread Steven Walter
Casually browsing through my system logs, I came upon this two oopses that happened together (logged as same second). I don't really remember what situation was surrounding, or even if any interruption was experienced. The system did totally freeze just under 30 minutes later, however, with no

Oops in 2.2.17

2000-10-17 Thread Kari Lempiainen
I'm running 2.2.17 on Dual SMP system. This appeared on syslog last night: Oct 18 03:28:39 trane kernel: Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 2d4d524d Oct 18 03:28:39 trane kernel: current->tss.cr3 = 00101000, %cr3 = 00101000 Oct 18 03:28:39 trane kernel: *pde =

Oops in 2.2.17

2000-10-17 Thread Kari Lempiainen
I'm running 2.2.17 on Dual SMP system. This appeared on syslog last night: Oct 18 03:28:39 trane kernel: Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 2d4d524d Oct 18 03:28:39 trane kernel: current-tss.cr3 = 00101000, %cr3 = 00101000 Oct 18 03:28:39 trane kernel: *pde =

Re: OOPS on 2.2.17

2000-09-29 Thread Keith Owens
On Fri, 29 Sep 2000 23:48:34 -0500 (CDT), Erik McKee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I recieved this oops on boot up. ksymoops claims that the module is from >2.2.16, but I haven't touched any of the modules after make >modules_install. >Warning (compare_Version): Version mismatch. 3c507 says

OOPS on 2.2.17

2000-09-29 Thread Erik McKee
Hello! I recieved this oops on boot up. ksymoops claims that the module is from 2.2.16, but I haven't touched any of the modules after make modules_install. Also, with 2.2.17 my networking freezes up more frequently then before. I only use ethernet and not ppp, so I don't now why this module

OOPS on 2.2.17

2000-09-29 Thread Erik McKee
Hello! I recieved this oops on boot up. ksymoops claims that the module is from 2.2.16, but I haven't touched any of the modules after make modules_install. Also, with 2.2.17 my networking freezes up more frequently then before. I only use ethernet and not ppp, so I don't now why this module