Re: [2/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2)

2007-03-26 Thread Tejun Heo
Adrian Bunk wrote: > Subject: NCQ problem with ahci and Hitachi drive (ACPI related) > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/4/178 > http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/9/475 > Submitter : Mathieu BĂ©rard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Handled-By : Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Status : p

Re: [2/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2)

2007-03-24 Thread Ray Lee
Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> Patch reproduced below, with an acked-by (and, uhm, a couple of spelling >> fixes in the description -- don't hate me, 'kay?). > > I know that my English sucks. Your English is fantastic, and far better than my German ever will be, so no worries :-). ~r. - To unsubscrib

Re: [2/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2)

2007-03-23 Thread Thomas Gleixner
Ray, On Fri, 2007-03-23 at 17:14 -0700, Ray Lee wrote: > (I wondered about the IPI on a UP system, seemed a bit weird :-).) > > Works great, booting both with NOAPIC and without. *Much* thanks for > debugging this while you're also handling a bunch of other issues at > the same time. Thank you f

Re: [2/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2)

2007-03-23 Thread Ray Lee
Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Fri, 2007-03-23 at 19:48 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: >> Subject: x86_64: ACPI regression with noapic (APICTIMER_STOPS_ON_C3?) >> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/8/468 >> http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/22/156 >> Submitter : Ray Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [2/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2)

2007-03-23 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Fri, 2007-03-23 at 19:48 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Subject: x86_64: ACPI regression with noapic (APICTIMER_STOPS_ON_C3?) > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/8/468 > http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/22/156 > Submitter : Ray Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Handled-By : Thomas Glei