On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 09:36:02AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 09:44:06PM +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> > Print the name of an undiscoverable attribute group as well, not just
> > the pointer's address.
>
> Shouldn't we just drop the pointer address and use the name?
On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 09:36:02AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 09:44:06PM +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> > Print the name of an undiscoverable attribute group as well, not just
> > the pointer's address.
>
> Shouldn't we just drop the pointer address and use the name?
On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 09:36:02AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 09:44:06PM +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> > Print the name of an undiscoverable attribute group as well, not just
> > the pointer's address.
>
> Shouldn't we just drop the pointer address and use the name?
On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 09:36:02AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 09:44:06PM +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> > Print the name of an undiscoverable attribute group as well, not just
> > the pointer's address.
>
> Shouldn't we just drop the pointer address and use the name?
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 09:44:06PM +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> Print the name of an undiscoverable attribute group as well, not just
> the pointer's address.
Shouldn't we just drop the pointer address and use the name? It's bad
form to be printing kernel addresses to the syslog these days
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 09:44:06PM +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> Print the name of an undiscoverable attribute group as well, not just
> the pointer's address.
Shouldn't we just drop the pointer address and use the name? It's bad
form to be printing kernel addresses to the syslog these days
6 matches
Mail list logo
