Re: [PATCH 02/21] fs: remove inline marking of EXPORT_SYMBOL functions

2013-05-09 Thread Denis
On 09.05.2013 12:07, Al Viro wrote: On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 11:58:24AM +0400, Denis Efremov wrote: EXPORT_SYMBOL and inline directives are contradictory to each other. The patch fixes this inconsistency. What makes them contradictory, in your opinion? With references to relevant parts of C99,

Re: [PATCH 02/21] fs: remove inline marking of EXPORT_SYMBOL functions

2013-05-09 Thread Al Viro
On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 11:58:24AM +0400, Denis Efremov wrote: > EXPORT_SYMBOL and inline directives are contradictory to each other. > The patch fixes this inconsistency. What makes them contradictory, in your opinion? With references to relevant parts of C99, please. -- To unsubscribe from

Re: [PATCH 02/21] fs: remove inline marking of EXPORT_SYMBOL functions

2013-05-09 Thread Al Viro
On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 11:58:24AM +0400, Denis Efremov wrote: EXPORT_SYMBOL and inline directives are contradictory to each other. The patch fixes this inconsistency. What makes them contradictory, in your opinion? With references to relevant parts of C99, please. -- To unsubscribe from this

Re: [PATCH 02/21] fs: remove inline marking of EXPORT_SYMBOL functions

2013-05-09 Thread Denis
On 09.05.2013 12:07, Al Viro wrote: On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 11:58:24AM +0400, Denis Efremov wrote: EXPORT_SYMBOL and inline directives are contradictory to each other. The patch fixes this inconsistency. What makes them contradictory, in your opinion? With references to relevant parts of C99,