On Wed, 11 Jul 2018 09:00:07 -0400
Brian Masney wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 12:29:33PM +, Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I really don't like the idea to have regulator handled inside the
> > driver. I know this was done like that before for Nexus 5, but I
> > think
On Wed, 11 Jul 2018 09:00:07 -0400
Brian Masney wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 12:29:33PM +, Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I really don't like the idea to have regulator handled inside the
> > driver. I know this was done like that before for Nexus 5, but I
> > think
On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 12:29:33PM +, Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I really don't like the idea to have regulator handled inside the driver. I
> know this was done like that before for Nexus 5, but I think now this is
> something that can be done using dts only.
> Does anyone
On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 12:29:33PM +, Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I really don't like the idea to have regulator handled inside the driver. I
> know this was done like that before for Nexus 5, but I think now this is
> something that can be done using dts only.
> Does anyone
Hello,
I really don't like the idea to have regulator handled inside the driver. I
know this was done like that before for Nexus 5, but I think now this is
something that can be done using dts only.
Does anyone know if there is a way with dts to handle regulator automatically
and prevent the
Hello,
I really don't like the idea to have regulator handled inside the driver. I
know this was done like that before for Nexus 5, but I think now this is
something that can be done using dts only.
Does anyone know if there is a way with dts to handle regulator automatically
and prevent the
On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 03:34:43PM +0530, Himanshu Jha wrote:
> Hi Brain,
>
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 09:09:31PM -0400, Brian Masney wrote:
> > This patch adds support for the regulator framework to the mpu6050
> > driver.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Brian Masney
> > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Marek
>
On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 03:34:43PM +0530, Himanshu Jha wrote:
> Hi Brain,
>
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 09:09:31PM -0400, Brian Masney wrote:
> > This patch adds support for the regulator framework to the mpu6050
> > driver.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Brian Masney
> > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Marek
>
Hi Brain,
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 09:09:31PM -0400, Brian Masney wrote:
> This patch adds support for the regulator framework to the mpu6050
> driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Masney
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Marek
> ---
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(inv_mpu_core_probe);
>
> +int
Hi Brain,
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 09:09:31PM -0400, Brian Masney wrote:
> This patch adds support for the regulator framework to the mpu6050
> driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Masney
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Marek
> ---
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(inv_mpu_core_probe);
>
> +int
On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 04:50:22PM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
> Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
>
> [auto build test ERROR on iio/togreg]
> [also build test ERROR on next-20180710]
> [cannot apply to v4.18-rc4]
> [if your patch is applied to the wrong git
On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 04:50:22PM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
> Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
>
> [auto build test ERROR on iio/togreg]
> [also build test ERROR on next-20180710]
> [cannot apply to v4.18-rc4]
> [if your patch is applied to the wrong git
Hi Brian,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on iio/togreg]
[also build test ERROR on next-20180710]
[cannot apply to v4.18-rc4]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
Hi Brian,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on iio/togreg]
[also build test ERROR on next-20180710]
[cannot apply to v4.18-rc4]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
14 matches
Mail list logo
