Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm: memcontrol: consolidate cgroup socket tracking

2016-09-19 Thread Michal Hocko
[Fixup Vladimir's email]

same here I do not feel familiar with the code enough to give my ack but
Vladimir might be in a better position

On Wed 14-09-16 15:48:46, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> The cgroup core and the memory controller need to track socket
> ownership for different purposes, but the tracking sites being
> entirely different is kind of ugly.
> 
> Be a better citizen and rename the memory controller callbacks to
> match the cgroup core callbacks, then move them to the same place.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner 
> ---
>  include/linux/memcontrol.h |  4 ++--
>  mm/memcontrol.c| 19 +++
>  net/core/sock.c|  6 +++---
>  net/ipv4/tcp.c |  2 --
>  net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c|  3 ---
>  5 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> index 0710143723bc..ca11b3e6dd65 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> @@ -773,8 +773,8 @@ static inline void mem_cgroup_wb_stats(struct 
> bdi_writeback *wb,
>  #endif   /* CONFIG_CGROUP_WRITEBACK */
>  
>  struct sock;
> -void sock_update_memcg(struct sock *sk);
> -void sock_release_memcg(struct sock *sk);
> +void mem_cgroup_sk_alloc(struct sock *sk);
> +void mem_cgroup_sk_free(struct sock *sk);
>  bool mem_cgroup_charge_skmem(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned int 
> nr_pages);
>  void mem_cgroup_uncharge_skmem(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned int 
> nr_pages);
>  #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 60bb830abc34..2caf1ee86e78 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -2939,7 +2939,7 @@ static int memcg_update_tcp_limit(struct mem_cgroup 
> *memcg, unsigned long limit)
>   /*
>* The active flag needs to be written after the static_key
>* update. This is what guarantees that the socket activation
> -  * function is the last one to run. See sock_update_memcg() for
> +  * function is the last one to run. See mem_cgroup_sk_alloc() 
> for
>* details, and note that we don't mark any socket as belonging
>* to this memcg until that flag is up.
>*
> @@ -2948,7 +2948,7 @@ static int memcg_update_tcp_limit(struct mem_cgroup 
> *memcg, unsigned long limit)
>* as accounted, but the accounting functions are not patched in
>* yet, we'll lose accounting.
>*
> -  * We never race with the readers in sock_update_memcg(),
> +  * We never race with the readers in mem_cgroup_sk_alloc(),
>* because when this value change, the code to process it is not
>* patched in yet.
>*/
> @@ -5651,11 +5651,15 @@ void mem_cgroup_migrate(struct page *oldpage, struct 
> page *newpage)
>  DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(memcg_sockets_enabled_key);
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(memcg_sockets_enabled_key);
>  
> -void sock_update_memcg(struct sock *sk)
> +void mem_cgroup_sk_alloc(struct sock *sk)
>  {
>   struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
>  
> - /* Socket cloning can throw us here with sk_cgrp already
> + if (!mem_cgroup_sockets_enabled)
> + return;
> +
> + /*
> +  * Socket cloning can throw us here with sk_memcg already
>* filled. It won't however, necessarily happen from
>* process context. So the test for root memcg given
>* the current task's memcg won't help us in this case.
> @@ -5680,12 +5684,11 @@ void sock_update_memcg(struct sock *sk)
>  out:
>   rcu_read_unlock();
>  }
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(sock_update_memcg);
>  
> -void sock_release_memcg(struct sock *sk)
> +void mem_cgroup_sk_free(struct sock *sk)
>  {
> - WARN_ON(!sk->sk_memcg);
> - css_put(>sk_memcg->css);
> + if (sk->sk_memcg)
> + css_put(>sk_memcg->css);
>  }
>  
>  /**
> diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
> index 038e660ef844..c73e28fc9c2a 100644
> --- a/net/core/sock.c
> +++ b/net/core/sock.c
> @@ -1363,6 +1363,7 @@ static void sk_prot_free(struct proto *prot, struct 
> sock *sk)
>   slab = prot->slab;
>  
>   cgroup_sk_free(>sk_cgrp_data);
> + mem_cgroup_sk_free(sk);
>   security_sk_free(sk);
>   if (slab != NULL)
>   kmem_cache_free(slab, sk);
> @@ -1399,6 +1400,7 @@ struct sock *sk_alloc(struct net *net, int family, 
> gfp_t priority,
>   sock_net_set(sk, net);
>   atomic_set(>sk_wmem_alloc, 1);
>  
> + mem_cgroup_sk_alloc(sk);
>   cgroup_sk_alloc(>sk_cgrp_data);
>   sock_update_classid(>sk_cgrp_data);
>   sock_update_netprioidx(>sk_cgrp_data);
> @@ -1545,6 +1547,7 @@ struct sock *sk_clone_lock(const struct sock *sk, const 
> gfp_t priority)
>   newsk->sk_incoming_cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
>   atomic64_set(>sk_cookie, 0);
>  
> + 

Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm: memcontrol: consolidate cgroup socket tracking

2016-09-19 Thread Michal Hocko
[Fixup Vladimir's email]

same here I do not feel familiar with the code enough to give my ack but
Vladimir might be in a better position

On Wed 14-09-16 15:48:46, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> The cgroup core and the memory controller need to track socket
> ownership for different purposes, but the tracking sites being
> entirely different is kind of ugly.
> 
> Be a better citizen and rename the memory controller callbacks to
> match the cgroup core callbacks, then move them to the same place.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner 
> ---
>  include/linux/memcontrol.h |  4 ++--
>  mm/memcontrol.c| 19 +++
>  net/core/sock.c|  6 +++---
>  net/ipv4/tcp.c |  2 --
>  net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c|  3 ---
>  5 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> index 0710143723bc..ca11b3e6dd65 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> @@ -773,8 +773,8 @@ static inline void mem_cgroup_wb_stats(struct 
> bdi_writeback *wb,
>  #endif   /* CONFIG_CGROUP_WRITEBACK */
>  
>  struct sock;
> -void sock_update_memcg(struct sock *sk);
> -void sock_release_memcg(struct sock *sk);
> +void mem_cgroup_sk_alloc(struct sock *sk);
> +void mem_cgroup_sk_free(struct sock *sk);
>  bool mem_cgroup_charge_skmem(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned int 
> nr_pages);
>  void mem_cgroup_uncharge_skmem(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned int 
> nr_pages);
>  #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 60bb830abc34..2caf1ee86e78 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -2939,7 +2939,7 @@ static int memcg_update_tcp_limit(struct mem_cgroup 
> *memcg, unsigned long limit)
>   /*
>* The active flag needs to be written after the static_key
>* update. This is what guarantees that the socket activation
> -  * function is the last one to run. See sock_update_memcg() for
> +  * function is the last one to run. See mem_cgroup_sk_alloc() 
> for
>* details, and note that we don't mark any socket as belonging
>* to this memcg until that flag is up.
>*
> @@ -2948,7 +2948,7 @@ static int memcg_update_tcp_limit(struct mem_cgroup 
> *memcg, unsigned long limit)
>* as accounted, but the accounting functions are not patched in
>* yet, we'll lose accounting.
>*
> -  * We never race with the readers in sock_update_memcg(),
> +  * We never race with the readers in mem_cgroup_sk_alloc(),
>* because when this value change, the code to process it is not
>* patched in yet.
>*/
> @@ -5651,11 +5651,15 @@ void mem_cgroup_migrate(struct page *oldpage, struct 
> page *newpage)
>  DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(memcg_sockets_enabled_key);
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(memcg_sockets_enabled_key);
>  
> -void sock_update_memcg(struct sock *sk)
> +void mem_cgroup_sk_alloc(struct sock *sk)
>  {
>   struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
>  
> - /* Socket cloning can throw us here with sk_cgrp already
> + if (!mem_cgroup_sockets_enabled)
> + return;
> +
> + /*
> +  * Socket cloning can throw us here with sk_memcg already
>* filled. It won't however, necessarily happen from
>* process context. So the test for root memcg given
>* the current task's memcg won't help us in this case.
> @@ -5680,12 +5684,11 @@ void sock_update_memcg(struct sock *sk)
>  out:
>   rcu_read_unlock();
>  }
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(sock_update_memcg);
>  
> -void sock_release_memcg(struct sock *sk)
> +void mem_cgroup_sk_free(struct sock *sk)
>  {
> - WARN_ON(!sk->sk_memcg);
> - css_put(>sk_memcg->css);
> + if (sk->sk_memcg)
> + css_put(>sk_memcg->css);
>  }
>  
>  /**
> diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
> index 038e660ef844..c73e28fc9c2a 100644
> --- a/net/core/sock.c
> +++ b/net/core/sock.c
> @@ -1363,6 +1363,7 @@ static void sk_prot_free(struct proto *prot, struct 
> sock *sk)
>   slab = prot->slab;
>  
>   cgroup_sk_free(>sk_cgrp_data);
> + mem_cgroup_sk_free(sk);
>   security_sk_free(sk);
>   if (slab != NULL)
>   kmem_cache_free(slab, sk);
> @@ -1399,6 +1400,7 @@ struct sock *sk_alloc(struct net *net, int family, 
> gfp_t priority,
>   sock_net_set(sk, net);
>   atomic_set(>sk_wmem_alloc, 1);
>  
> + mem_cgroup_sk_alloc(sk);
>   cgroup_sk_alloc(>sk_cgrp_data);
>   sock_update_classid(>sk_cgrp_data);
>   sock_update_netprioidx(>sk_cgrp_data);
> @@ -1545,6 +1547,7 @@ struct sock *sk_clone_lock(const struct sock *sk, const 
> gfp_t priority)
>   newsk->sk_incoming_cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
>   atomic64_set(>sk_cookie, 0);
>  
> + mem_cgroup_sk_alloc(newsk);
>  

Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm: memcontrol: consolidate cgroup socket tracking

2016-09-15 Thread Johannes Weiner
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 03:17:14PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Sep 2016 13:34:24 +0800 kbuild test robot  wrote:
> 
> > Hi Johannes,
> > 
> > [auto build test ERROR on net/master]
> > [also build test ERROR on v4.8-rc6 next-20160914]
> > [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to 
> > help improve the system]
> > [Suggest to use git(>=2.9.0) format-patch --base= (or --base=auto 
> > for convenience) to record what (public, well-known) commit your patch 
> > series was built on]
> > [Check https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch for more information]
> > 
> > url:
> > https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Johannes-Weiner/mm-memcontrol-make-per-cpu-charge-cache-IRQ-safe-for-socket-accounting/20160915-035634
> > config: m68k-sun3_defconfig (attached as .config)
> > compiler: m68k-linux-gcc (GCC) 4.9.0
> > reproduce:
> > wget 
> > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.cross
> >  -O ~/bin/make.cross
> > chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
> > # save the attached .config to linux build tree
> > make.cross ARCH=m68k 
> > 
> > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> > 
> >net/built-in.o: In function `sk_alloc':
> > >> (.text+0x4076): undefined reference to `mem_cgroup_sk_alloc'
> >net/built-in.o: In function `__sk_destruct':
> > >> sock.c:(.text+0x457e): undefined reference to `mem_cgroup_sk_free'
> >net/built-in.o: In function `sk_clone_lock':
> >(.text+0x4f1c): undefined reference to `mem_cgroup_sk_alloc'
> 
> This?

Thanks for fixing it up, Andrew.

I think it'd be nicer to declare the dummy functions for !CONFIG_MEMCG;
it also doesn't look like a hotpath that would necessitate the jump
label in that place. Dave, any preference either way?

Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner 
---

diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
index ca11b3e6dd65..61d20c17f3b7 100644
--- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
+++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
@@ -773,13 +773,13 @@ static inline void mem_cgroup_wb_stats(struct 
bdi_writeback *wb,
 #endif /* CONFIG_CGROUP_WRITEBACK */
 
 struct sock;
-void mem_cgroup_sk_alloc(struct sock *sk);
-void mem_cgroup_sk_free(struct sock *sk);
 bool mem_cgroup_charge_skmem(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned int nr_pages);
 void mem_cgroup_uncharge_skmem(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned int 
nr_pages);
 #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
 extern struct static_key_false memcg_sockets_enabled_key;
 #define mem_cgroup_sockets_enabled 
static_branch_unlikely(_sockets_enabled_key)
+void mem_cgroup_sk_alloc(struct sock *sk);
+void mem_cgroup_sk_free(struct sock *sk);
 static inline bool mem_cgroup_under_socket_pressure(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
 {
if (!cgroup_subsys_on_dfl(memory_cgrp_subsys) && memcg->tcpmem_pressure)
@@ -792,6 +792,8 @@ static inline bool mem_cgroup_under_socket_pressure(struct 
mem_cgroup *memcg)
 }
 #else
 #define mem_cgroup_sockets_enabled 0
+static inline void mem_cgroup_sk_alloc(struct sock *sk) { };
+static inline void mem_cgroup_sk_free(struct sock *sk) { };
 static inline bool mem_cgroup_under_socket_pressure(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
 {
return false;


Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm: memcontrol: consolidate cgroup socket tracking

2016-09-15 Thread Johannes Weiner
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 03:17:14PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Sep 2016 13:34:24 +0800 kbuild test robot  wrote:
> 
> > Hi Johannes,
> > 
> > [auto build test ERROR on net/master]
> > [also build test ERROR on v4.8-rc6 next-20160914]
> > [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to 
> > help improve the system]
> > [Suggest to use git(>=2.9.0) format-patch --base= (or --base=auto 
> > for convenience) to record what (public, well-known) commit your patch 
> > series was built on]
> > [Check https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch for more information]
> > 
> > url:
> > https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Johannes-Weiner/mm-memcontrol-make-per-cpu-charge-cache-IRQ-safe-for-socket-accounting/20160915-035634
> > config: m68k-sun3_defconfig (attached as .config)
> > compiler: m68k-linux-gcc (GCC) 4.9.0
> > reproduce:
> > wget 
> > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.cross
> >  -O ~/bin/make.cross
> > chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
> > # save the attached .config to linux build tree
> > make.cross ARCH=m68k 
> > 
> > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> > 
> >net/built-in.o: In function `sk_alloc':
> > >> (.text+0x4076): undefined reference to `mem_cgroup_sk_alloc'
> >net/built-in.o: In function `__sk_destruct':
> > >> sock.c:(.text+0x457e): undefined reference to `mem_cgroup_sk_free'
> >net/built-in.o: In function `sk_clone_lock':
> >(.text+0x4f1c): undefined reference to `mem_cgroup_sk_alloc'
> 
> This?

Thanks for fixing it up, Andrew.

I think it'd be nicer to declare the dummy functions for !CONFIG_MEMCG;
it also doesn't look like a hotpath that would necessitate the jump
label in that place. Dave, any preference either way?

Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner 
---

diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
index ca11b3e6dd65..61d20c17f3b7 100644
--- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
+++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
@@ -773,13 +773,13 @@ static inline void mem_cgroup_wb_stats(struct 
bdi_writeback *wb,
 #endif /* CONFIG_CGROUP_WRITEBACK */
 
 struct sock;
-void mem_cgroup_sk_alloc(struct sock *sk);
-void mem_cgroup_sk_free(struct sock *sk);
 bool mem_cgroup_charge_skmem(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned int nr_pages);
 void mem_cgroup_uncharge_skmem(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned int 
nr_pages);
 #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
 extern struct static_key_false memcg_sockets_enabled_key;
 #define mem_cgroup_sockets_enabled 
static_branch_unlikely(_sockets_enabled_key)
+void mem_cgroup_sk_alloc(struct sock *sk);
+void mem_cgroup_sk_free(struct sock *sk);
 static inline bool mem_cgroup_under_socket_pressure(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
 {
if (!cgroup_subsys_on_dfl(memory_cgrp_subsys) && memcg->tcpmem_pressure)
@@ -792,6 +792,8 @@ static inline bool mem_cgroup_under_socket_pressure(struct 
mem_cgroup *memcg)
 }
 #else
 #define mem_cgroup_sockets_enabled 0
+static inline void mem_cgroup_sk_alloc(struct sock *sk) { };
+static inline void mem_cgroup_sk_free(struct sock *sk) { };
 static inline bool mem_cgroup_under_socket_pressure(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
 {
return false;


Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm: memcontrol: consolidate cgroup socket tracking

2016-09-14 Thread Andrew Morton
On Thu, 15 Sep 2016 13:34:24 +0800 kbuild test robot  wrote:

> Hi Johannes,
> 
> [auto build test ERROR on net/master]
> [also build test ERROR on v4.8-rc6 next-20160914]
> [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to 
> help improve the system]
> [Suggest to use git(>=2.9.0) format-patch --base= (or --base=auto for 
> convenience) to record what (public, well-known) commit your patch series was 
> built on]
> [Check https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch for more information]
> 
> url:
> https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Johannes-Weiner/mm-memcontrol-make-per-cpu-charge-cache-IRQ-safe-for-socket-accounting/20160915-035634
> config: m68k-sun3_defconfig (attached as .config)
> compiler: m68k-linux-gcc (GCC) 4.9.0
> reproduce:
> wget 
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.cross
>  -O ~/bin/make.cross
> chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
> # save the attached .config to linux build tree
> make.cross ARCH=m68k 
> 
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> 
>net/built-in.o: In function `sk_alloc':
> >> (.text+0x4076): undefined reference to `mem_cgroup_sk_alloc'
>net/built-in.o: In function `__sk_destruct':
> >> sock.c:(.text+0x457e): undefined reference to `mem_cgroup_sk_free'
>net/built-in.o: In function `sk_clone_lock':
>(.text+0x4f1c): undefined reference to `mem_cgroup_sk_alloc'

This?

--- a/mm/memcontrol.c~mm-memcontrol-consolidate-cgroup-socket-tracking-fix
+++ a/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -5655,9 +5655,6 @@ void mem_cgroup_sk_alloc(struct sock *sk
 {
struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
 
-   if (!mem_cgroup_sockets_enabled)
-   return;
-
/*
 * Socket cloning can throw us here with sk_memcg already
 * filled. It won't however, necessarily happen from
--- a/net/core/sock.c~mm-memcontrol-consolidate-cgroup-socket-tracking-fix
+++ a/net/core/sock.c
@@ -1385,7 +1385,8 @@ static void sk_prot_free(struct proto *p
slab = prot->slab;
 
cgroup_sk_free(>sk_cgrp_data);
-   mem_cgroup_sk_free(sk);
+   if (mem_cgroup_sockets_enabled)
+   mem_cgroup_sk_free(sk);
security_sk_free(sk);
if (slab != NULL)
kmem_cache_free(slab, sk);
@@ -1422,7 +1423,8 @@ struct sock *sk_alloc(struct net *net, i
sock_net_set(sk, net);
atomic_set(>sk_wmem_alloc, 1);
 
-   mem_cgroup_sk_alloc(sk);
+   if (mem_cgroup_sockets_enabled)
+   mem_cgroup_sk_alloc(sk);
cgroup_sk_alloc(>sk_cgrp_data);
sock_update_classid(>sk_cgrp_data);
sock_update_netprioidx(>sk_cgrp_data);
@@ -1569,7 +1571,8 @@ struct sock *sk_clone_lock(const struct
newsk->sk_incoming_cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
atomic64_set(>sk_cookie, 0);
 
-   mem_cgroup_sk_alloc(newsk);
+   if (mem_cgroup_sockets_enabled)
+   mem_cgroup_sk_alloc(newsk);
cgroup_sk_alloc(>sk_cgrp_data);
 
/*
_



Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm: memcontrol: consolidate cgroup socket tracking

2016-09-14 Thread Andrew Morton
On Thu, 15 Sep 2016 13:34:24 +0800 kbuild test robot  wrote:

> Hi Johannes,
> 
> [auto build test ERROR on net/master]
> [also build test ERROR on v4.8-rc6 next-20160914]
> [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to 
> help improve the system]
> [Suggest to use git(>=2.9.0) format-patch --base= (or --base=auto for 
> convenience) to record what (public, well-known) commit your patch series was 
> built on]
> [Check https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch for more information]
> 
> url:
> https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Johannes-Weiner/mm-memcontrol-make-per-cpu-charge-cache-IRQ-safe-for-socket-accounting/20160915-035634
> config: m68k-sun3_defconfig (attached as .config)
> compiler: m68k-linux-gcc (GCC) 4.9.0
> reproduce:
> wget 
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.cross
>  -O ~/bin/make.cross
> chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
> # save the attached .config to linux build tree
> make.cross ARCH=m68k 
> 
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> 
>net/built-in.o: In function `sk_alloc':
> >> (.text+0x4076): undefined reference to `mem_cgroup_sk_alloc'
>net/built-in.o: In function `__sk_destruct':
> >> sock.c:(.text+0x457e): undefined reference to `mem_cgroup_sk_free'
>net/built-in.o: In function `sk_clone_lock':
>(.text+0x4f1c): undefined reference to `mem_cgroup_sk_alloc'

This?

--- a/mm/memcontrol.c~mm-memcontrol-consolidate-cgroup-socket-tracking-fix
+++ a/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -5655,9 +5655,6 @@ void mem_cgroup_sk_alloc(struct sock *sk
 {
struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
 
-   if (!mem_cgroup_sockets_enabled)
-   return;
-
/*
 * Socket cloning can throw us here with sk_memcg already
 * filled. It won't however, necessarily happen from
--- a/net/core/sock.c~mm-memcontrol-consolidate-cgroup-socket-tracking-fix
+++ a/net/core/sock.c
@@ -1385,7 +1385,8 @@ static void sk_prot_free(struct proto *p
slab = prot->slab;
 
cgroup_sk_free(>sk_cgrp_data);
-   mem_cgroup_sk_free(sk);
+   if (mem_cgroup_sockets_enabled)
+   mem_cgroup_sk_free(sk);
security_sk_free(sk);
if (slab != NULL)
kmem_cache_free(slab, sk);
@@ -1422,7 +1423,8 @@ struct sock *sk_alloc(struct net *net, i
sock_net_set(sk, net);
atomic_set(>sk_wmem_alloc, 1);
 
-   mem_cgroup_sk_alloc(sk);
+   if (mem_cgroup_sockets_enabled)
+   mem_cgroup_sk_alloc(sk);
cgroup_sk_alloc(>sk_cgrp_data);
sock_update_classid(>sk_cgrp_data);
sock_update_netprioidx(>sk_cgrp_data);
@@ -1569,7 +1571,8 @@ struct sock *sk_clone_lock(const struct
newsk->sk_incoming_cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
atomic64_set(>sk_cookie, 0);
 
-   mem_cgroup_sk_alloc(newsk);
+   if (mem_cgroup_sockets_enabled)
+   mem_cgroup_sk_alloc(newsk);
cgroup_sk_alloc(>sk_cgrp_data);
 
/*
_



Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm: memcontrol: consolidate cgroup socket tracking

2016-09-14 Thread kbuild test robot
Hi Johannes,

[auto build test ERROR on net/master]
[also build test ERROR on v4.8-rc6 next-20160914]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help 
improve the system]
[Suggest to use git(>=2.9.0) format-patch --base= (or --base=auto for 
convenience) to record what (public, well-known) commit your patch series was 
built on]
[Check https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch for more information]

url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Johannes-Weiner/mm-memcontrol-make-per-cpu-charge-cache-IRQ-safe-for-socket-accounting/20160915-035634
config: m68k-sun3_defconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: m68k-linux-gcc (GCC) 4.9.0
reproduce:
wget 
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.cross
 -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
make.cross ARCH=m68k 

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   net/built-in.o: In function `sk_alloc':
>> (.text+0x4076): undefined reference to `mem_cgroup_sk_alloc'
   net/built-in.o: In function `__sk_destruct':
>> sock.c:(.text+0x457e): undefined reference to `mem_cgroup_sk_free'
   net/built-in.o: In function `sk_clone_lock':
   (.text+0x4f1c): undefined reference to `mem_cgroup_sk_alloc'

---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructureOpen Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all   Intel Corporation


.config.gz
Description: Binary data


Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm: memcontrol: consolidate cgroup socket tracking

2016-09-14 Thread kbuild test robot
Hi Johannes,

[auto build test ERROR on net/master]
[also build test ERROR on v4.8-rc6 next-20160914]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help 
improve the system]
[Suggest to use git(>=2.9.0) format-patch --base= (or --base=auto for 
convenience) to record what (public, well-known) commit your patch series was 
built on]
[Check https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch for more information]

url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Johannes-Weiner/mm-memcontrol-make-per-cpu-charge-cache-IRQ-safe-for-socket-accounting/20160915-035634
config: m68k-sun3_defconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: m68k-linux-gcc (GCC) 4.9.0
reproduce:
wget 
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.cross
 -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
make.cross ARCH=m68k 

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   net/built-in.o: In function `sk_alloc':
>> (.text+0x4076): undefined reference to `mem_cgroup_sk_alloc'
   net/built-in.o: In function `__sk_destruct':
>> sock.c:(.text+0x457e): undefined reference to `mem_cgroup_sk_free'
   net/built-in.o: In function `sk_clone_lock':
   (.text+0x4f1c): undefined reference to `mem_cgroup_sk_alloc'

---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructureOpen Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all   Intel Corporation


.config.gz
Description: Binary data


Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm: memcontrol: consolidate cgroup socket tracking

2016-09-14 Thread kbuild test robot
Hi Johannes,

[auto build test ERROR on net/master]
[also build test ERROR on v4.8-rc6 next-20160914]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help 
improve the system]
[Suggest to use git(>=2.9.0) format-patch --base= (or --base=auto for 
convenience) to record what (public, well-known) commit your patch series was 
built on]
[Check https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch for more information]

url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Johannes-Weiner/mm-memcontrol-make-per-cpu-charge-cache-IRQ-safe-for-socket-accounting/20160915-035634
config: parisc-c3000_defconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: hppa-linux-gnu-gcc (Debian 5.4.0-6) 5.4.0 20160609
reproduce:
wget 
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.cross
 -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
make.cross ARCH=parisc 

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   net/built-in.o: In function `sk_alloc':
>> (.text.sk_alloc+0x88): undefined reference to `mem_cgroup_sk_alloc'
   net/built-in.o: In function `__sk_destruct':
>> net/core/sock.o:(.text.__sk_destruct+0xbc): undefined reference to 
>> `mem_cgroup_sk_free'
   net/built-in.o: In function `sk_clone_lock':
>> (.text.sk_clone_lock+0x164): undefined reference to `mem_cgroup_sk_alloc'

---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructureOpen Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all   Intel Corporation


.config.gz
Description: Binary data


Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm: memcontrol: consolidate cgroup socket tracking

2016-09-14 Thread kbuild test robot
Hi Johannes,

[auto build test ERROR on net/master]
[also build test ERROR on v4.8-rc6 next-20160914]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help 
improve the system]
[Suggest to use git(>=2.9.0) format-patch --base= (or --base=auto for 
convenience) to record what (public, well-known) commit your patch series was 
built on]
[Check https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch for more information]

url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Johannes-Weiner/mm-memcontrol-make-per-cpu-charge-cache-IRQ-safe-for-socket-accounting/20160915-035634
config: parisc-c3000_defconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: hppa-linux-gnu-gcc (Debian 5.4.0-6) 5.4.0 20160609
reproduce:
wget 
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.cross
 -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
make.cross ARCH=parisc 

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   net/built-in.o: In function `sk_alloc':
>> (.text.sk_alloc+0x88): undefined reference to `mem_cgroup_sk_alloc'
   net/built-in.o: In function `__sk_destruct':
>> net/core/sock.o:(.text.__sk_destruct+0xbc): undefined reference to 
>> `mem_cgroup_sk_free'
   net/built-in.o: In function `sk_clone_lock':
>> (.text.sk_clone_lock+0x164): undefined reference to `mem_cgroup_sk_alloc'

---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructureOpen Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all   Intel Corporation


.config.gz
Description: Binary data


Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm: memcontrol: consolidate cgroup socket tracking

2016-09-14 Thread kbuild test robot
Hi Johannes,

[auto build test ERROR on net/master]
[also build test ERROR on v4.8-rc6 next-20160914]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help 
improve the system]
[Suggest to use git(>=2.9.0) format-patch --base= (or --base=auto for 
convenience) to record what (public, well-known) commit your patch series was 
built on]
[Check https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch for more information]

url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Johannes-Weiner/mm-memcontrol-make-per-cpu-charge-cache-IRQ-safe-for-socket-accounting/20160915-035634
config: parisc-b180_defconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: hppa-linux-gnu-gcc (Debian 5.4.0-6) 5.4.0 20160609
reproduce:
wget 
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.cross
 -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
make.cross ARCH=parisc 

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   net/built-in.o: In function `sk_alloc':
   (.text.sk_alloc+0xb4): undefined reference to `mem_cgroup_sk_alloc'
   net/built-in.o: In function `__sk_destruct':
>> net/core/.tmp_sock.o:(.text.__sk_destruct+0xdc): undefined reference to 
>> `mem_cgroup_sk_free'
   net/built-in.o: In function `sk_clone_lock':
   (.text.sk_clone_lock+0x184): undefined reference to `mem_cgroup_sk_alloc'

---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructureOpen Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all   Intel Corporation


.config.gz
Description: Binary data


Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm: memcontrol: consolidate cgroup socket tracking

2016-09-14 Thread kbuild test robot
Hi Johannes,

[auto build test ERROR on net/master]
[also build test ERROR on v4.8-rc6 next-20160914]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help 
improve the system]
[Suggest to use git(>=2.9.0) format-patch --base= (or --base=auto for 
convenience) to record what (public, well-known) commit your patch series was 
built on]
[Check https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch for more information]

url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Johannes-Weiner/mm-memcontrol-make-per-cpu-charge-cache-IRQ-safe-for-socket-accounting/20160915-035634
config: parisc-b180_defconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: hppa-linux-gnu-gcc (Debian 5.4.0-6) 5.4.0 20160609
reproduce:
wget 
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.cross
 -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
make.cross ARCH=parisc 

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   net/built-in.o: In function `sk_alloc':
   (.text.sk_alloc+0xb4): undefined reference to `mem_cgroup_sk_alloc'
   net/built-in.o: In function `__sk_destruct':
>> net/core/.tmp_sock.o:(.text.__sk_destruct+0xdc): undefined reference to 
>> `mem_cgroup_sk_free'
   net/built-in.o: In function `sk_clone_lock':
   (.text.sk_clone_lock+0x184): undefined reference to `mem_cgroup_sk_alloc'

---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructureOpen Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all   Intel Corporation


.config.gz
Description: Binary data


Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm: memcontrol: consolidate cgroup socket tracking

2016-09-14 Thread Tejun Heo
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 03:48:46PM -0400, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> The cgroup core and the memory controller need to track socket
> ownership for different purposes, but the tracking sites being
> entirely different is kind of ugly.
> 
> Be a better citizen and rename the memory controller callbacks to
> match the cgroup core callbacks, then move them to the same place.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner 

For 1-3,

Acked-by: Tejun Heo 

Thanks.

-- 
tejun


Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm: memcontrol: consolidate cgroup socket tracking

2016-09-14 Thread Tejun Heo
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 03:48:46PM -0400, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> The cgroup core and the memory controller need to track socket
> ownership for different purposes, but the tracking sites being
> entirely different is kind of ugly.
> 
> Be a better citizen and rename the memory controller callbacks to
> match the cgroup core callbacks, then move them to the same place.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner 

For 1-3,

Acked-by: Tejun Heo 

Thanks.

-- 
tejun