Re: [PATCH 4.8 00/10] 4.8.1-stable review

2016-10-11 Thread Guenter Roeck 

On 10/11/2016 03:19 AM, Mark Brown wrote:

On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 12:47:43PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:

On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 09:11:23PM +0200, Mark Brown wrote:



My connection doesn't have IPv6 and is a bit spotty right now so it's a
bit difficult for me to check by lab but today's -next jobs are working
for me as well...  looking at the log for the failed stable boots:



Can you send me (or point me to) the qemu command lines you are using ?


Managed to get things running long enough to pull the log:

qemu-system-arm -M vexpress-a15 -no-reboot -show-cursor -no-reboot -nographic -m 256 -net 
user -kernel /var/lib/lava/dispatcher/tmp/tmpZBxic8/.zImage -append "root=/dev/ram0 
rw console=ttyAMA0 115200 ip=dhcp mem=256M" -initrd 
/var/lib/lava/dispatcher/tmp/tmpxoFsPn/ramdisk.cpio.gz -dtb 
/var/lib/lava/dispatcher/tmp/tmpMN1a1R/vexpress-v2p-ca15_a7.dtb



Boots for me, though I have to specify
-append "rdinit=/sbin/init console=ttyAMA0,115200"
or, when using a root file system,
-drive file=core-image-minimal-qemuarm.ext3,format=raw,if=sd \
-append "root=/dev/mmcblk0 rootwait rw console=ttyAMA0,115200"

I do get the warning about the wrong CPU id, but looks like that is as expected.

I tried with qemu 2.5, 1.6, and 2.7, and the mainline kernel as well as v4.7.

Guenter

Re: [PATCH 4.8 00/10] 4.8.1-stable review

2016-10-11 Thread Guenter Roeck 

On 10/11/2016 03:19 AM, Mark Brown wrote:

On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 12:47:43PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:

On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 09:11:23PM +0200, Mark Brown wrote:



My connection doesn't have IPv6 and is a bit spotty right now so it's a
bit difficult for me to check by lab but today's -next jobs are working
for me as well...  looking at the log for the failed stable boots:



Can you send me (or point me to) the qemu command lines you are using ?


Managed to get things running long enough to pull the log:

qemu-system-arm -M vexpress-a15 -no-reboot -show-cursor -no-reboot -nographic -m 256 -net 
user -kernel /var/lib/lava/dispatcher/tmp/tmpZBxic8/.zImage -append "root=/dev/ram0 
rw console=ttyAMA0 115200 ip=dhcp mem=256M" -initrd 
/var/lib/lava/dispatcher/tmp/tmpxoFsPn/ramdisk.cpio.gz -dtb 
/var/lib/lava/dispatcher/tmp/tmpMN1a1R/vexpress-v2p-ca15_a7.dtb



Boots for me, though I have to specify
-append "rdinit=/sbin/init console=ttyAMA0,115200"
or, when using a root file system,
-drive file=core-image-minimal-qemuarm.ext3,format=raw,if=sd \
-append "root=/dev/mmcblk0 rootwait rw console=ttyAMA0,115200"

I do get the warning about the wrong CPU id, but looks like that is as expected.

I tried with qemu 2.5, 1.6, and 2.7, and the mainline kernel as well as v4.7.

Guenter

Re: [PATCH 4.8 00/10] 4.8.1-stable review

2016-10-11 Thread Mark Brown 
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 12:47:43PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 09:11:23PM +0200, Mark Brown wrote:

> > My connection doesn't have IPv6 and is a bit spotty right now so it's a
> > bit difficult for me to check by lab but today's -next jobs are working
> > for me as well...  looking at the log for the failed stable boots:

> Can you send me (or point me to) the qemu command lines you are using ?

Managed to get things running long enough to pull the log:

qemu-system-arm -M vexpress-a15 -no-reboot -show-cursor -no-reboot -nographic 
-m 256 -net user -kernel /var/lib/lava/dispatcher/tmp/tmpZBxic8/.zImage -append 
"root=/dev/ram0 rw console=ttyAMA0 115200 ip=dhcp mem=256M" -initrd 
/var/lib/lava/dispatcher/tmp/tmpxoFsPn/ramdisk.cpio.gz -dtb 
/var/lib/lava/dispatcher/tmp/tmpMN1a1R/vexpress-v2p-ca15_a7.dtb

> Even better would the complete setup describing how you connect to kernelci.

Like I say it's just a standard LAVA install.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Re: [PATCH 4.8 00/10] 4.8.1-stable review

2016-10-11 Thread Mark Brown 
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 12:47:43PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 09:11:23PM +0200, Mark Brown wrote:

> > My connection doesn't have IPv6 and is a bit spotty right now so it's a
> > bit difficult for me to check by lab but today's -next jobs are working
> > for me as well...  looking at the log for the failed stable boots:

> Can you send me (or point me to) the qemu command lines you are using ?

Managed to get things running long enough to pull the log:

qemu-system-arm -M vexpress-a15 -no-reboot -show-cursor -no-reboot -nographic 
-m 256 -net user -kernel /var/lib/lava/dispatcher/tmp/tmpZBxic8/.zImage -append 
"root=/dev/ram0 rw console=ttyAMA0 115200 ip=dhcp mem=256M" -initrd 
/var/lib/lava/dispatcher/tmp/tmpxoFsPn/ramdisk.cpio.gz -dtb 
/var/lib/lava/dispatcher/tmp/tmpMN1a1R/vexpress-v2p-ca15_a7.dtb

> Even better would the complete setup describing how you connect to kernelci.

Like I say it's just a standard LAVA install.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Re: [PATCH 4.8 00/10] 4.8.1-stable review

2016-10-11 Thread Mark Brown 
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 12:47:43PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 09:11:23PM +0200, Mark Brown wrote:

> > My connection doesn't have IPv6 and is a bit spotty right now so it's a
> > bit difficult for me to check by lab but today's -next jobs are working
> > for me as well...  looking at the log for the failed stable boots:

> Can you send me (or point me to) the qemu command lines you are using ?

See above.

> Even better would the complete setup describing how you connect to kernelci.

It's an off the shelf install of LAVA.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Re: [PATCH 4.8 00/10] 4.8.1-stable review

2016-10-11 Thread Mark Brown 
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 12:47:43PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 09:11:23PM +0200, Mark Brown wrote:

> > My connection doesn't have IPv6 and is a bit spotty right now so it's a
> > bit difficult for me to check by lab but today's -next jobs are working
> > for me as well...  looking at the log for the failed stable boots:

> Can you send me (or point me to) the qemu command lines you are using ?

See above.

> Even better would the complete setup describing how you connect to kernelci.

It's an off the shelf install of LAVA.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Re: [PATCH 4.8 00/10] 4.8.1-stable review

2016-10-10 Thread Guenter Roeck 
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 09:11:23PM +0200, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 05:54:22AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> 
> > Can I find the qemu command line somewhere ? The following work fine
> > for me.
> 
> > Building arm:vexpress-a9:multi_v7_defconfig:vexpress-v2p-ca9 ... running 
> > . passed
> > Building arm:vexpress-a15:multi_v7_defconfig:vexpress-v2p-ca15-tc1 ... 
> > running . passed
> 
> Note that most of the failures my lab saw are with extra configs, the
> only vanilla config that failed was vexpress-v2p-ca15_a7 with the
> multi_v7_defconfig.
> 
> My connection doesn't have IPv6 and is a bit spotty right now so it's a
> bit difficult for me to check by lab but today's -next jobs are working
> for me as well...  looking at the log for the failed stable boots:
> 
> https://storage.kernelci.org/stable/v4.8.1/arm-multi_v7_defconfig/lab-broonie/boot-vexpress-v2p-ca15_a7.html
> 
> looks like it's some interaction with the test image causing udevadm
> settle to not run quickly enough - there's also a big delay before the
> UART comes up.  I'm wondering if it's just that the host machine is just
> too slow here.

Can you send me (or point me to) the qemu command lines you are using ?
Even better would the complete setup describing how you connect to kernelci.

Thanks,
Guenter

Re: [PATCH 4.8 00/10] 4.8.1-stable review

2016-10-10 Thread Guenter Roeck 
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 09:11:23PM +0200, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 05:54:22AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> 
> > Can I find the qemu command line somewhere ? The following work fine
> > for me.
> 
> > Building arm:vexpress-a9:multi_v7_defconfig:vexpress-v2p-ca9 ... running 
> > . passed
> > Building arm:vexpress-a15:multi_v7_defconfig:vexpress-v2p-ca15-tc1 ... 
> > running . passed
> 
> Note that most of the failures my lab saw are with extra configs, the
> only vanilla config that failed was vexpress-v2p-ca15_a7 with the
> multi_v7_defconfig.
> 
> My connection doesn't have IPv6 and is a bit spotty right now so it's a
> bit difficult for me to check by lab but today's -next jobs are working
> for me as well...  looking at the log for the failed stable boots:
> 
> https://storage.kernelci.org/stable/v4.8.1/arm-multi_v7_defconfig/lab-broonie/boot-vexpress-v2p-ca15_a7.html
> 
> looks like it's some interaction with the test image causing udevadm
> settle to not run quickly enough - there's also a big delay before the
> UART comes up.  I'm wondering if it's just that the host machine is just
> too slow here.

Can you send me (or point me to) the qemu command lines you are using ?
Even better would the complete setup describing how you connect to kernelci.

Thanks,
Guenter

Re: [PATCH 4.8 00/10] 4.8.1-stable review

2016-10-10 Thread Mark Brown 
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 05:54:22AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:

> Can I find the qemu command line somewhere ? The following work fine
> for me.

> Building arm:vexpress-a9:multi_v7_defconfig:vexpress-v2p-ca9 ... running 
> . passed
> Building arm:vexpress-a15:multi_v7_defconfig:vexpress-v2p-ca15-tc1 ... 
> running . passed

Note that most of the failures my lab saw are with extra configs, the
only vanilla config that failed was vexpress-v2p-ca15_a7 with the
multi_v7_defconfig.

My connection doesn't have IPv6 and is a bit spotty right now so it's a
bit difficult for me to check by lab but today's -next jobs are working
for me as well...  looking at the log for the failed stable boots:

https://storage.kernelci.org/stable/v4.8.1/arm-multi_v7_defconfig/lab-broonie/boot-vexpress-v2p-ca15_a7.html

looks like it's some interaction with the test image causing udevadm
settle to not run quickly enough - there's also a big delay before the
UART comes up.  I'm wondering if it's just that the host machine is just
too slow here.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Re: [PATCH 4.8 00/10] 4.8.1-stable review

2016-10-10 Thread Mark Brown 
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 05:54:22AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:

> Can I find the qemu command line somewhere ? The following work fine
> for me.

> Building arm:vexpress-a9:multi_v7_defconfig:vexpress-v2p-ca9 ... running 
> . passed
> Building arm:vexpress-a15:multi_v7_defconfig:vexpress-v2p-ca15-tc1 ... 
> running . passed

Note that most of the failures my lab saw are with extra configs, the
only vanilla config that failed was vexpress-v2p-ca15_a7 with the
multi_v7_defconfig.

My connection doesn't have IPv6 and is a bit spotty right now so it's a
bit difficult for me to check by lab but today's -next jobs are working
for me as well...  looking at the log for the failed stable boots:

https://storage.kernelci.org/stable/v4.8.1/arm-multi_v7_defconfig/lab-broonie/boot-vexpress-v2p-ca15_a7.html

looks like it's some interaction with the test image causing udevadm
settle to not run quickly enough - there's also a big delay before the
UART comes up.  I'm wondering if it's just that the host machine is just
too slow here.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Re: [PATCH 4.8 00/10] 4.8.1-stable review

2016-10-10 Thread Guenter Roeck 

On 10/10/2016 02:38 AM, Mark Brown wrote:

On Sat, Oct 08, 2016 at 10:22:41AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:

On 10/08/2016 09:11 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote:



vexpress-v2p-ca15-tc1: 1 failed lab
vexpress-v2p-ca15_a7: 1 failed lab



These builds are known broken an QEMU need to be blacklisted until we
find out what's going on.



Is this with qemu or on a real board ?



If with qemu, what is your qemu version ?


qemu 2.5



Can I find the qemu command line somewhere ? The following work fine
for me.

Building arm:vexpress-a9:multi_v7_defconfig:vexpress-v2p-ca9 ... running . 
passed
Building arm:vexpress-a15:multi_v7_defconfig:vexpress-v2p-ca15-tc1 ... running 
. passed

Thanks,
Guenter

Re: [PATCH 4.8 00/10] 4.8.1-stable review

2016-10-10 Thread Guenter Roeck 

On 10/10/2016 02:38 AM, Mark Brown wrote:

On Sat, Oct 08, 2016 at 10:22:41AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:

On 10/08/2016 09:11 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote:



vexpress-v2p-ca15-tc1: 1 failed lab
vexpress-v2p-ca15_a7: 1 failed lab



These builds are known broken an QEMU need to be blacklisted until we
find out what's going on.



Is this with qemu or on a real board ?



If with qemu, what is your qemu version ?


qemu 2.5



Can I find the qemu command line somewhere ? The following work fine
for me.

Building arm:vexpress-a9:multi_v7_defconfig:vexpress-v2p-ca9 ... running . 
passed
Building arm:vexpress-a15:multi_v7_defconfig:vexpress-v2p-ca15-tc1 ... running 
. passed

Thanks,
Guenter

Re: [PATCH 4.8 00/10] 4.8.1-stable review

2016-10-10 Thread Mark Brown 
On Sat, Oct 08, 2016 at 10:22:41AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 10/08/2016 09:11 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote:

> > > > vexpress-v2p-ca15-tc1: 1 failed lab
> > > > vexpress-v2p-ca15_a7: 1 failed lab

> > These builds are known broken an QEMU need to be blacklisted until we
> > find out what's going on.

> Is this with qemu or on a real board ?

> If with qemu, what is your qemu version ?

qemu 2.5


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Re: [PATCH 4.8 00/10] 4.8.1-stable review

2016-10-10 Thread Mark Brown 
On Sat, Oct 08, 2016 at 10:22:41AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 10/08/2016 09:11 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote:

> > > > vexpress-v2p-ca15-tc1: 1 failed lab
> > > > vexpress-v2p-ca15_a7: 1 failed lab

> > These builds are known broken an QEMU need to be blacklisted until we
> > find out what's going on.

> Is this with qemu or on a real board ?

> If with qemu, what is your qemu version ?

qemu 2.5


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Re: [PATCH 4.8 00/10] 4.8.1-stable review

2016-10-08 Thread Guenter Roeck 

On 10/08/2016 09:11 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote:

Greg Kroah-Hartman  writes:


On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 03:26:04PM -0700, kernelci.org bot wrote:

stable-rc boot: 479 boots: 4 failed, 183 passed with 292 offline 
(v4.8-11-ge141008f62ab)

Full Boot Summary: 
https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/stable-rc/kernel/v4.8-11-ge141008f62ab/
Full Build Summary: 
https://kernelci.org/build/stable-rc/kernel/v4.8-11-ge141008f62ab/

Tree: stable-rc
Branch: local/linux-4.8.y
Git Describe: v4.8-11-ge141008f62ab
Git Commit: e141008f62abab72c15b093d97a88f37c8cd7096
Git URL: 
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
Tested: 86 unique boards, 23 SoC families, 33 builds out of 206

Boot Failures Detected: https://kernelci.org/boot/?v4.8-11-ge141008f62ab

arm:

mxs_defconfig:
imx23-olinuxino: 1 failed lab


This one looks like lab-specific intermittent failures, not related to
the this kernel.


multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_SMP=n:
imx6q-sabrelite: 1 failed lab


The CONFIG_SMP=n boots for this board have been failing for awhile, so
this isn't related to stable-rc


multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y:
vexpress-v2p-ca15-tc1: 1 failed lab
vexpress-v2p-ca15_a7: 1 failed lab


These builds are known broken an QEMU need to be blacklisted until we
find out what's going on.


Is this with qemu or on a real board ?

If with qemu, what is your qemu version ?

Thanks,
Guenter

Re: [PATCH 4.8 00/10] 4.8.1-stable review

2016-10-08 Thread Guenter Roeck 

On 10/08/2016 09:11 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote:

Greg Kroah-Hartman  writes:


On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 03:26:04PM -0700, kernelci.org bot wrote:

stable-rc boot: 479 boots: 4 failed, 183 passed with 292 offline 
(v4.8-11-ge141008f62ab)

Full Boot Summary: 
https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/stable-rc/kernel/v4.8-11-ge141008f62ab/
Full Build Summary: 
https://kernelci.org/build/stable-rc/kernel/v4.8-11-ge141008f62ab/

Tree: stable-rc
Branch: local/linux-4.8.y
Git Describe: v4.8-11-ge141008f62ab
Git Commit: e141008f62abab72c15b093d97a88f37c8cd7096
Git URL: 
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
Tested: 86 unique boards, 23 SoC families, 33 builds out of 206

Boot Failures Detected: https://kernelci.org/boot/?v4.8-11-ge141008f62ab

arm:

mxs_defconfig:
imx23-olinuxino: 1 failed lab


This one looks like lab-specific intermittent failures, not related to
the this kernel.


multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_SMP=n:
imx6q-sabrelite: 1 failed lab


The CONFIG_SMP=n boots for this board have been failing for awhile, so
this isn't related to stable-rc


multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y:
vexpress-v2p-ca15-tc1: 1 failed lab
vexpress-v2p-ca15_a7: 1 failed lab


These builds are known broken an QEMU need to be blacklisted until we
find out what's going on.


Is this with qemu or on a real board ?

If with qemu, what is your qemu version ?

Thanks,
Guenter

Re: [PATCH 4.8 00/10] 4.8.1-stable review

2016-10-08 Thread Kevin Hilman 
Greg Kroah-Hartman  writes:

> On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 03:26:04PM -0700, kernelci.org bot wrote:
>> stable-rc boot: 479 boots: 4 failed, 183 passed with 292 offline 
>> (v4.8-11-ge141008f62ab)
>> 
>> Full Boot Summary: 
>> https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/stable-rc/kernel/v4.8-11-ge141008f62ab/
>> Full Build Summary: 
>> https://kernelci.org/build/stable-rc/kernel/v4.8-11-ge141008f62ab/
>> 
>> Tree: stable-rc
>> Branch: local/linux-4.8.y
>> Git Describe: v4.8-11-ge141008f62ab
>> Git Commit: e141008f62abab72c15b093d97a88f37c8cd7096
>> Git URL: 
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
>> Tested: 86 unique boards, 23 SoC families, 33 builds out of 206
>> 
>> Boot Failures Detected: https://kernelci.org/boot/?v4.8-11-ge141008f62ab
>> 
>> arm:
>> 
>> mxs_defconfig:
>> imx23-olinuxino: 1 failed lab

This one looks like lab-specific intermittent failures, not related to
the this kernel.

>> multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_SMP=n:
>> imx6q-sabrelite: 1 failed lab

The CONFIG_SMP=n boots for this board have been failing for awhile, so
this isn't related to stable-rc

>> multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y:
>> vexpress-v2p-ca15-tc1: 1 failed lab
>> vexpress-v2p-ca15_a7: 1 failed lab

These builds are known broken an QEMU need to be blacklisted until we
find out what's going on.

Kevin

Re: [PATCH 4.8 00/10] 4.8.1-stable review

2016-10-08 Thread Kevin Hilman 
Greg Kroah-Hartman  writes:

> On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 03:26:04PM -0700, kernelci.org bot wrote:
>> stable-rc boot: 479 boots: 4 failed, 183 passed with 292 offline 
>> (v4.8-11-ge141008f62ab)
>> 
>> Full Boot Summary: 
>> https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/stable-rc/kernel/v4.8-11-ge141008f62ab/
>> Full Build Summary: 
>> https://kernelci.org/build/stable-rc/kernel/v4.8-11-ge141008f62ab/
>> 
>> Tree: stable-rc
>> Branch: local/linux-4.8.y
>> Git Describe: v4.8-11-ge141008f62ab
>> Git Commit: e141008f62abab72c15b093d97a88f37c8cd7096
>> Git URL: 
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
>> Tested: 86 unique boards, 23 SoC families, 33 builds out of 206
>> 
>> Boot Failures Detected: https://kernelci.org/boot/?v4.8-11-ge141008f62ab
>> 
>> arm:
>> 
>> mxs_defconfig:
>> imx23-olinuxino: 1 failed lab

This one looks like lab-specific intermittent failures, not related to
the this kernel.

>> multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_SMP=n:
>> imx6q-sabrelite: 1 failed lab

The CONFIG_SMP=n boots for this board have been failing for awhile, so
this isn't related to stable-rc

>> multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y:
>> vexpress-v2p-ca15-tc1: 1 failed lab
>> vexpress-v2p-ca15_a7: 1 failed lab

These builds are known broken an QEMU need to be blacklisted until we
find out what's going on.

Kevin

Re: [PATCH 4.8 00/10] 4.8.1-stable review

2016-10-08 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman 
On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 03:26:04PM -0700, kernelci.org bot wrote:
> stable-rc boot: 479 boots: 4 failed, 183 passed with 292 offline 
> (v4.8-11-ge141008f62ab)
> 
> Full Boot Summary: 
> https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/stable-rc/kernel/v4.8-11-ge141008f62ab/
> Full Build Summary: 
> https://kernelci.org/build/stable-rc/kernel/v4.8-11-ge141008f62ab/
> 
> Tree: stable-rc
> Branch: local/linux-4.8.y
> Git Describe: v4.8-11-ge141008f62ab
> Git Commit: e141008f62abab72c15b093d97a88f37c8cd7096
> Git URL: 
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
> Tested: 86 unique boards, 23 SoC families, 33 builds out of 206
> 
> Boot Failures Detected: https://kernelci.org/boot/?v4.8-11-ge141008f62ab
> 
> arm:
> 
> mxs_defconfig:
> imx23-olinuxino: 1 failed lab
> 
> multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_SMP=n:
> imx6q-sabrelite: 1 failed lab
> 
> multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y:
> vexpress-v2p-ca15-tc1: 1 failed lab
> vexpress-v2p-ca15_a7: 1 failed lab

How does this compare to 4.8.0?

thanks,

greg k-h

Re: [PATCH 4.8 00/10] 4.8.1-stable review

2016-10-08 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman 
On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 03:26:04PM -0700, kernelci.org bot wrote:
> stable-rc boot: 479 boots: 4 failed, 183 passed with 292 offline 
> (v4.8-11-ge141008f62ab)
> 
> Full Boot Summary: 
> https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/stable-rc/kernel/v4.8-11-ge141008f62ab/
> Full Build Summary: 
> https://kernelci.org/build/stable-rc/kernel/v4.8-11-ge141008f62ab/
> 
> Tree: stable-rc
> Branch: local/linux-4.8.y
> Git Describe: v4.8-11-ge141008f62ab
> Git Commit: e141008f62abab72c15b093d97a88f37c8cd7096
> Git URL: 
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
> Tested: 86 unique boards, 23 SoC families, 33 builds out of 206
> 
> Boot Failures Detected: https://kernelci.org/boot/?v4.8-11-ge141008f62ab
> 
> arm:
> 
> mxs_defconfig:
> imx23-olinuxino: 1 failed lab
> 
> multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_SMP=n:
> imx6q-sabrelite: 1 failed lab
> 
> multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y:
> vexpress-v2p-ca15-tc1: 1 failed lab
> vexpress-v2p-ca15_a7: 1 failed lab

How does this compare to 4.8.0?

thanks,

greg k-h

Re: [PATCH 4.8 00/10] 4.8.1-stable review

2016-10-06 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman 
On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 11:51:01AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 10:18:23AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.8.1 release.
> > There are 10 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Sat Oct  8 07:47:33 UTC 2016.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> 
> Build results:
>   total: 149 pass: 149 fail: 0
> Qemu test results:
>   total: 108 pass: 108 fail: 0
> 
> Details are available at http://kerneltests.org/builders.

Great, thanks for testing all of these and letting me know.

greg k-h

Re: [PATCH 4.8 00/10] 4.8.1-stable review

2016-10-06 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman 
On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 11:51:01AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 10:18:23AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.8.1 release.
> > There are 10 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Sat Oct  8 07:47:33 UTC 2016.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> 
> Build results:
>   total: 149 pass: 149 fail: 0
> Qemu test results:
>   total: 108 pass: 108 fail: 0
> 
> Details are available at http://kerneltests.org/builders.

Great, thanks for testing all of these and letting me know.

greg k-h

Re: [PATCH 4.8 00/10] 4.8.1-stable review

2016-10-06 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman 
On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 01:56:28PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 10/06/2016 02:18 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.8.1 release.
> > There are 10 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Sat Oct  8 07:47:33 UTC 2016.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.8.1-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> >   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git 
> > linux-4.8.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > 
> > thanks,
> > 
> > greg k-h
> > 
> 
> Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.

Thanks for testing all of these and letting me know.

greg k-h

Re: [PATCH 4.8 00/10] 4.8.1-stable review

2016-10-06 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman 
On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 01:56:28PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 10/06/2016 02:18 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.8.1 release.
> > There are 10 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Sat Oct  8 07:47:33 UTC 2016.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.8.1-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> >   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git 
> > linux-4.8.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > 
> > thanks,
> > 
> > greg k-h
> > 
> 
> Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.

Thanks for testing all of these and letting me know.

greg k-h

Re: [PATCH 4.8 00/10] 4.8.1-stable review

2016-10-06 Thread Shuah Khan 
On 10/06/2016 02:18 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.8.1 release.
> There are 10 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat Oct  8 07:47:33 UTC 2016.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>   kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.8.1-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git 
> linux-4.8.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 

Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.

thanks,
-- Shuah

-- 
Shuah Khan
Sr. Linux Kernel Developer
Open Source Innovation Group
Samsung Research America(Silicon Valley)
shuah...@samsung.com

Re: [PATCH 4.8 00/10] 4.8.1-stable review

2016-10-06 Thread Shuah Khan 
On 10/06/2016 02:18 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.8.1 release.
> There are 10 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat Oct  8 07:47:33 UTC 2016.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>   kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.8.1-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git 
> linux-4.8.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 

Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.

thanks,
-- Shuah

-- 
Shuah Khan
Sr. Linux Kernel Developer
Open Source Innovation Group
Samsung Research America(Silicon Valley)
shuah...@samsung.com

Re: [PATCH 4.8 00/10] 4.8.1-stable review

2016-10-06 Thread Guenter Roeck 
On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 10:18:23AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.8.1 release.
> There are 10 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat Oct  8 07:47:33 UTC 2016.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 

Build results:
total: 149 pass: 149 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
total: 108 pass: 108 fail: 0

Details are available at http://kerneltests.org/builders.

Guenter

Re: [PATCH 4.8 00/10] 4.8.1-stable review

2016-10-06 Thread Guenter Roeck 
On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 10:18:23AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.8.1 release.
> There are 10 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat Oct  8 07:47:33 UTC 2016.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 

Build results:
total: 149 pass: 149 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
total: 108 pass: 108 fail: 0

Details are available at http://kerneltests.org/builders.

Guenter