> On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 04:21:37PM -0800, Daniel Lustig wrote:
> > On 3/9/2018 2:57 PM, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> > > On Fri, 09 Mar 2018 13:30:08 PST (-0800), parri.and...@gmail.com wrote:
> > >> On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 10:54:27AM -0800, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> > >>> On Fri, 09 Mar 2018 10:36:44
> On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 04:21:37PM -0800, Daniel Lustig wrote:
> > On 3/9/2018 2:57 PM, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> > > On Fri, 09 Mar 2018 13:30:08 PST (-0800), parri.and...@gmail.com wrote:
> > >> On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 10:54:27AM -0800, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> > >>> On Fri, 09 Mar 2018 10:36:44
On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 04:21:37PM -0800, Daniel Lustig wrote:
> On 3/9/2018 2:57 PM, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> > On Fri, 09 Mar 2018 13:30:08 PST (-0800), parri.and...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 10:54:27AM -0800, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 09 Mar 2018 10:36:44 PST
On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 04:21:37PM -0800, Daniel Lustig wrote:
> On 3/9/2018 2:57 PM, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> > On Fri, 09 Mar 2018 13:30:08 PST (-0800), parri.and...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 10:54:27AM -0800, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 09 Mar 2018 10:36:44 PST
On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 04:21:37PM -0800, Daniel Lustig wrote:
> On 3/9/2018 2:57 PM, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> > On Fri, 09 Mar 2018 13:30:08 PST (-0800), parri.and...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 10:54:27AM -0800, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 09 Mar 2018 10:36:44 PST
On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 04:21:37PM -0800, Daniel Lustig wrote:
> On 3/9/2018 2:57 PM, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> > On Fri, 09 Mar 2018 13:30:08 PST (-0800), parri.and...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 10:54:27AM -0800, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 09 Mar 2018 10:36:44 PST
On 3/9/2018 2:57 PM, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Mar 2018 13:30:08 PST (-0800), parri.and...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 10:54:27AM -0800, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>>> On Fri, 09 Mar 2018 10:36:44 PST (-0800), parri.and...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> >This proposal
On 3/9/2018 2:57 PM, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Mar 2018 13:30:08 PST (-0800), parri.and...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 10:54:27AM -0800, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>>> On Fri, 09 Mar 2018 10:36:44 PST (-0800), parri.and...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> >This proposal
On Fri, 09 Mar 2018 13:30:08 PST (-0800), parri.and...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 10:54:27AM -0800, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
On Fri, 09 Mar 2018 10:36:44 PST (-0800), parri.and...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
>This belongs to the "few style fixes" (in the specific, 80-chars lines)
On Fri, 09 Mar 2018 13:30:08 PST (-0800), parri.and...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 10:54:27AM -0800, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
On Fri, 09 Mar 2018 10:36:44 PST (-0800), parri.and...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
>This belongs to the "few style fixes" (in the specific, 80-chars lines)
On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 10:54:27AM -0800, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Mar 2018 10:36:44 PST (-0800), parri.and...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
> >This belongs to the "few style fixes" (in the specific, 80-chars lines)
> >mentioned in the cover letter; I could not resist ;-), but I'll remove
>
On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 10:54:27AM -0800, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Mar 2018 10:36:44 PST (-0800), parri.and...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
> >This belongs to the "few style fixes" (in the specific, 80-chars lines)
> >mentioned in the cover letter; I could not resist ;-), but I'll remove
>
On Fri, 09 Mar 2018 10:36:44 PST (-0800), parri.and...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 09:56:21AM -0800, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
On Fri, 09 Mar 2018 04:13:40 PST (-0800), parri.and...@gmail.com wrote:
>Atomics present the same issue with locking: release and acquire
>variants need to be
On Fri, 09 Mar 2018 10:36:44 PST (-0800), parri.and...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 09:56:21AM -0800, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
On Fri, 09 Mar 2018 04:13:40 PST (-0800), parri.and...@gmail.com wrote:
>Atomics present the same issue with locking: release and acquire
>variants need to be
On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 09:56:21AM -0800, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Mar 2018 04:13:40 PST (-0800), parri.and...@gmail.com wrote:
> >Atomics present the same issue with locking: release and acquire
> >variants need to be strengthened to meet the constraints defined
> >by the Linux-kernel
On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 09:56:21AM -0800, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Mar 2018 04:13:40 PST (-0800), parri.and...@gmail.com wrote:
> >Atomics present the same issue with locking: release and acquire
> >variants need to be strengthened to meet the constraints defined
> >by the Linux-kernel
On Fri, 09 Mar 2018 04:13:40 PST (-0800), parri.and...@gmail.com wrote:
Atomics present the same issue with locking: release and acquire
variants need to be strengthened to meet the constraints defined
by the Linux-kernel memory consistency model [1].
Atomics present a further issue:
On Fri, 09 Mar 2018 04:13:40 PST (-0800), parri.and...@gmail.com wrote:
Atomics present the same issue with locking: release and acquire
variants need to be strengthened to meet the constraints defined
by the Linux-kernel memory consistency model [1].
Atomics present a further issue:
On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 11:39:11AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Mar 2018, Andrea Parri wrote:
>
> > Atomics present the same issue with locking: release and acquire
> > variants need to be strengthened to meet the constraints defined
> > by the Linux-kernel memory consistency model [1].
>
On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 11:39:11AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Mar 2018, Andrea Parri wrote:
>
> > Atomics present the same issue with locking: release and acquire
> > variants need to be strengthened to meet the constraints defined
> > by the Linux-kernel memory consistency model [1].
>
On Fri, 9 Mar 2018, Andrea Parri wrote:
> Atomics present the same issue with locking: release and acquire
> variants need to be strengthened to meet the constraints defined
> by the Linux-kernel memory consistency model [1].
>
> Atomics present a further issue: implementations of atomics such
>
On Fri, 9 Mar 2018, Andrea Parri wrote:
> Atomics present the same issue with locking: release and acquire
> variants need to be strengthened to meet the constraints defined
> by the Linux-kernel memory consistency model [1].
>
> Atomics present a further issue: implementations of atomics such
>
22 matches
Mail list logo