Re: [PATCH v4] Fixes for compiling with clang

On 2016-12-01 19:13, Peter Foley wrote: > On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 6:22 AM, Michal Marek wrote: >> Dne 28.11.2016 v 07:44 Peter Foley napsal(a): >> This adds new -Wno-* options also for the gcc case, is there a reason >> for this? Also, the -Wno-missing-field-initializers option

Re: [PATCH v4] Fixes for compiling with clang

On 2016-12-01 19:13, Peter Foley wrote: > On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 6:22 AM, Michal Marek wrote: >> Dne 28.11.2016 v 07:44 Peter Foley napsal(a): >> This adds new -Wno-* options also for the gcc case, is there a reason >> for this? Also, the -Wno-missing-field-initializers option is not >>

Re: [PATCH v4] Fixes for compiling with clang

On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 6:22 AM, Michal Marek wrote: > Dne 28.11.2016 v 07:44 Peter Foley napsal(a): > This adds new -Wno-* options also for the gcc case, is there a reason > for this? Also, the -Wno-missing-field-initializers option is not > available in some old gccs, so we

Re: [PATCH v4] Fixes for compiling with clang

On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 6:22 AM, Michal Marek wrote: > Dne 28.11.2016 v 07:44 Peter Foley napsal(a): > This adds new -Wno-* options also for the gcc case, is there a reason > for this? Also, the -Wno-missing-field-initializers option is not > available in some old gccs, so we would need a HOSTCC

Re: [PATCH v4] Fixes for compiling with clang

Dne 28.11.2016 v 07:44 Peter Foley napsal(a): > Fix reversed conditional checking if HOSTCC is clang. > Suppress warnings about unsupported optimization options. > Suppress warnings about unused functions, as they are generated for > every module and are therefore far too spammy. > Disable clang's

Re: [PATCH v4] Fixes for compiling with clang

Dne 28.11.2016 v 07:44 Peter Foley napsal(a): > Fix reversed conditional checking if HOSTCC is clang. > Suppress warnings about unsupported optimization options. > Suppress warnings about unused functions, as they are generated for > every module and are therefore far too spammy. > Disable clang's