On Thu 2016-12-01 11:10:42, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (11/25/16 12:07), Petr Mladek wrote:
> [..]
> > > +static void report_message_lost(atomic_t *num_lost, char *fmt)
> > > +{
> > > + int lost = atomic_xchg(num_lost, 0);
> > > +
> > > + if (lost) {
> > > + char msg[56];
>
> > I would
On Thu 2016-12-01 11:10:42, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (11/25/16 12:07), Petr Mladek wrote:
> [..]
> > > +static void report_message_lost(atomic_t *num_lost, char *fmt)
> > > +{
> > > + int lost = atomic_xchg(num_lost, 0);
> > > +
> > > + if (lost) {
> > > + char msg[56];
>
> > I would
On (11/25/16 12:07), Petr Mladek wrote:
[..]
> > +static void report_message_lost(atomic_t *num_lost, char *fmt)
> > +{
> > + int lost = atomic_xchg(num_lost, 0);
> > +
> > + if (lost) {
> > + char msg[56];
>
> I would really like to avoid a hard coded buffer size. Such things
> are
On (11/25/16 12:07), Petr Mladek wrote:
[..]
> > +static void report_message_lost(atomic_t *num_lost, char *fmt)
> > +{
> > + int lost = atomic_xchg(num_lost, 0);
> > +
> > + if (lost) {
> > + char msg[56];
>
> I would really like to avoid a hard coded buffer size. Such things
> are
On Fri 2016-10-28 00:49:31, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> Account lost messages in pritk-safe and printk-safe-nmi
> contexts and report those numbers during printk_safe_flush().
>
> Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky
> ---
> kernel/printk/internal.h| 17
On Fri 2016-10-28 00:49:31, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> Account lost messages in pritk-safe and printk-safe-nmi
> contexts and report those numbers during printk_safe_flush().
>
> Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky
> ---
> kernel/printk/internal.h| 17 ---
>
6 matches
Mail list logo