On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 23:09:43 +
Zan Lynx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 15:02 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 20:38:24 +
> > Zan Lynx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > While I'm reporting problems I'll get this one out there.
> > >
> > > I
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 15:02 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 20:38:24 +
> Zan Lynx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > While I'm reporting problems I'll get this one out there.
> >
> > I normally use a USB-2 memory card reader but I also have a PCMCIA
> > CompactFlash adapter
On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 20:44:45 +
Zan Lynx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am not sure if this problem has been addressed already. I read some
> about the fast-fail issues and this may be related?
>
> On nearly all my USB block devices, I have been getting zillions of I/O
> errors. But they
On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 20:38:24 +
Zan Lynx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> While I'm reporting problems I'll get this one out there.
>
> I normally use a USB-2 memory card reader but I also have a PCMCIA
> CompactFlash adapter that I use occasionally. During the MM series
> kernels 2.6.22 and 23
On Dec 6, 2007 9:12 PM, Dave Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 build failed at drivers/net/wireless/ath5k/base.c for some
> inline functions like this:
> drivers/net/wireless/ath5k/base.c:292: sorry, unimplemented: inlining failed
> in call to 'ath5k_extend_tsf': function
> How about running 2.6.24-rc4 with _only_ the patch to this driver to
> convert it to krefs? Does that combination cause problems?
>
> The patch is at:
>
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/gregkh/gregkh-2.6/gregkh-01-driver/kobject-convert-hvcs-to-use-kref-not-kobject.patch
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 15:28 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 19:44:29 +0100, Kay Sievers said:
>
> > > Anybody got any brilliant ideas? :)
> >
> > I guess it's nash again, which version is it?
>
> Confirmed - nash again. 6.0.9 does not work, upgrading to 6.0.19 works.
Oh,
On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 19:44:29 +0100, Kay Sievers said:
> > Anybody got any brilliant ideas? :)
>
> I guess it's nash again, which version is it?
Confirmed - nash again. 6.0.9 does not work, upgrading to 6.0.19 works.
init/Kconfig says this for SYSFS_DEPRECATED (which is where I got lead
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 13:20 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 00:24:04 +0100, Kay Sievers said:
> > On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 18:12 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 23:04:12 +0100, Kay Sievers said:
> > >
> > > > What's the value of SYSFS_DEPRECATED? Care
On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 00:24:04 +0100, Kay Sievers said:
> On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 18:12 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 23:04:12 +0100, Kay Sievers said:
> >
> > > What's the value of SYSFS_DEPRECATED? Care to set it to yes, if it isn't,
> > > and try again?
> >
> > I *knew*
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, David Miller wrote:
> From: Reuben Farrelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2007 17:59:37 +1100
>
> > On 5/12/2007 4:17 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > - Lots of device IDs have been removed from the e1000 driver and moved
> > > over
> > > to e1000e. So if your
* Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 18:28:25 -0500
> "Miles Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > How can I find Roland's patches, so I can try backing them out?
> > I looked in the broken out patches and only saw one related
> > to VDSO. Backing it out did not
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 22:56:53 -0500 "Miles Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The machine is: http://www.gateway.com/retail/mt6821.php
> Gnu C 4.2.3
> Gnu make 3.81
> binutils 2.18.20071027
> util-linux 2.13.1-rc1
> mount
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, David Miller wrote:
From: Reuben Farrelly [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2007 17:59:37 +1100
On 5/12/2007 4:17 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
- Lots of device IDs have been removed from the e1000 driver and moved
over
to e1000e. So if your e1000 stops
* Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 18:28:25 -0500
Miles Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How can I find Roland's patches, so I can try backing them out?
I looked in the broken out patches and only saw one related
to VDSO. Backing it out did not help. I tried
On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 00:24:04 +0100, Kay Sievers said:
On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 18:12 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 23:04:12 +0100, Kay Sievers said:
What's the value of SYSFS_DEPRECATED? Care to set it to yes, if it isn't,
and try again?
I *knew* there was a
Zan Lynx wrote:
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 15:22 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 23:09:43 +
Zan Lynx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 15:02 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 20:38:24 +
Zan Lynx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While I'm reporting
Hello,
I tried it on sun ultra 60 (dual sparc64) station. Unfortunately it
failed
to compile.
AS arch/sparc64/lib/xor.o
AR arch/sparc64/lib/lib.a
GEN .version
CHK include/linux/compile.h
dnsdomainname: Unknown host
UPD include/linux/compile.h
CC
On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 23:09:43 +
Zan Lynx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 15:02 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 20:38:24 +
Zan Lynx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While I'm reporting problems I'll get this one out there.
I normally use a USB-2
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 15:02 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 20:38:24 +
Zan Lynx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While I'm reporting problems I'll get this one out there.
I normally use a USB-2 memory card reader but I also have a PCMCIA
CompactFlash adapter that I use
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 15:28 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 19:44:29 +0100, Kay Sievers said:
Anybody got any brilliant ideas? :)
I guess it's nash again, which version is it?
Confirmed - nash again. 6.0.9 does not work, upgrading to 6.0.19 works.
Oh, cool!
I
On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 19:44:29 +0100, Kay Sievers said:
Anybody got any brilliant ideas? :)
I guess it's nash again, which version is it?
Confirmed - nash again. 6.0.9 does not work, upgrading to 6.0.19 works.
init/Kconfig says this for SYSFS_DEPRECATED (which is where I got lead astray,
as
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 15:22 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 23:09:43 +
Zan Lynx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[cut]
Now with MM kernels 2.6.24 rc1-4 the PCMCIA adapter works again, but I
only get read rates of 1.6 MB/s. When it used to work in 2.6.20 I got
at least
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 20:26:43 +
Zan Lynx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Today I noticed pgrep doesn't work. It seems the reason is a missing
Name: tag in the status file for a process in /proc.
# cat /proc/1/status
init
State: S (sleeping)
Tgid:
On Sat, 8 Dec 2007 01:04:55 +0100
Mariusz Kozlowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I tried it on sun ultra 60 (dual sparc64) station. Unfortunately it
failed
to compile.
AS arch/sparc64/lib/xor.o
AR arch/sparc64/lib/lib.a
GEN .version
CHK
On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 20:44:45 +
Zan Lynx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am not sure if this problem has been addressed already. I read some
about the fast-fail issues and this may be related?
On nearly all my USB block devices, I have been getting zillions of I/O
errors. But they aren't
On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 20:38:24 +
Zan Lynx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While I'm reporting problems I'll get this one out there.
I normally use a USB-2 memory card reader but I also have a PCMCIA
CompactFlash adapter that I use occasionally. During the MM series
kernels 2.6.22 and 23 (I am
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 15:22 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 23:09:43 +
Zan Lynx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 15:02 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 20:38:24 +
Zan Lynx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While I'm reporting
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 13:20 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 00:24:04 +0100, Kay Sievers said:
On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 18:12 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 23:04:12 +0100, Kay Sievers said:
What's the value of SYSFS_DEPRECATED? Care to set it to
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 22:56:53 -0500 Miles Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The machine is: http://www.gateway.com/retail/mt6821.php
Gnu C 4.2.3
Gnu make 3.81
binutils 2.18.20071027
util-linux 2.13.1-rc1
mount 2.13.1-rc1
On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 20:26:43 +
Zan Lynx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Today I noticed pgrep doesn't work. It seems the reason is a missing
Name: tag in the status file for a process in /proc.
# cat /proc/1/status
init
State: S (sleeping)
Tgid: 1
Pid:1
PPid: 0
TracerPid: 0
How about running 2.6.24-rc4 with _only_ the patch to this driver to
convert it to krefs? Does that combination cause problems?
The patch is at:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/gregkh/gregkh-2.6/gregkh-01-driver/kobject-convert-hvcs-to-use-kref-not-kobject.patch
This
On Dec 6, 2007 9:12 PM, Dave Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
2.6.24-rc4-mm1 build failed at drivers/net/wireless/ath5k/base.c for some
inline functions like this:
drivers/net/wireless/ath5k/base.c:292: sorry, unimplemented: inlining failed
in call to 'ath5k_extend_tsf': function body
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 03:05:37PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 20:44:45 +
Zan Lynx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am not sure if this problem has been addressed already. I read some
about the fast-fail issues and this may be related?
On nearly all my USB block
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 08:32:26AM +0530, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 03:54:51PM -0800, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 12:31 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 12:28:58AM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 03:54:51PM -0800, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
>> On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 12:31 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 12:28:58AM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
Greg KH wrote:
>> Why release the spinlock here? It's done after the count is
Hi,
2.6.24-rc4-mm1 build failed at drivers/net/wireless/ath5k/base.c for some
inline functions like this:
drivers/net/wireless/ath5k/base.c:292: sorry, unimplemented: inlining failed in
call to 'ath5k_extend_tsf': function body not available
fix it with adjust the order of inline function
Badari Pulavarty wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 00:28 +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
>> Greg KH wrote:
>>
Why release the spinlock here? It's done after the count is incremented.
This patch does not seem correct.
>>> Doh, you are correct, I'll make sure that I fix this up before applying
>>>
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 03:54:51PM -0800, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 12:31 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 12:28:58AM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
> > > Greg KH wrote:
> > >
> > > >> Why release the spinlock here? It's done after the count is
> > > >>
On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 12:31 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 12:28:58AM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
> > Greg KH wrote:
> >
> > >> Why release the spinlock here? It's done after the count is incremented.
> > >> This patch does not seem correct.
> > >
> > > Doh, you are correct, I'll
I found:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel=119550978915647=2
through
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel=119551057816829=2
(I was unable to locate the 6th patch in the set)
When I tried backing out the patches, there were tons of errors. I
guess I'll punt on trying to build this MM tree. Sorry.
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 18:28:25 -0500
"Miles Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How can I find Roland's patches, so I can try backing them out?
> I looked in the broken out patches and only saw one related
> to VDSO. Backing it out did not help. I tried searching for
> messages to LKML sent by
How can I find Roland's patches, so I can try backing them out?
I looked in the broken out patches and only saw one related
to VDSO. Backing it out did not help. I tried searching for
messages to LKML sent by "roland" but mostly got a bunch of
folks sending spam.
Thanks,
On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 18:12 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 23:04:12 +0100, Kay Sievers said:
>
> > What's the value of SYSFS_DEPRECATED? Care to set it to yes, if it isn't,
> > and try again?
>
> I *knew* there was a D'Oh! error in here. ;)
>
> Bisection is fast closing
On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 23:04:12 +0100, Kay Sievers said:
> What's the value of SYSFS_DEPRECATED? Care to set it to yes, if it isn't,
> and try again?
I *knew* there was a D'Oh! error in here. ;)
Bisection is fast closing in on gregkh-driver-block-device.patch, which broke
my LVM almost the exact
On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 23:28:38 +0100
Laurent Riffard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Le 05.12.2007 06:17, Andrew Morton a écrit :
> > Temporarily at
> > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.24-rc4-mm1/
> > Will appear later at
> >
> >
Le 05.12.2007 06:17, Andrew Morton a écrit :
> Temporarily at
> http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.24-rc4-mm1/
> Will appear later at
>
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.24-rc4/2.6.24-rc4-mm1/
LDS arch/x86/vdso/vdso32/vdso32.lds
AS
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 11:04:12PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> A fix for LVM to handle symlinks instead of directories is in the LVM
> CVS tree, but there wasn't a release since August.
I released it yesterday:-)
Alasdair
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On Dec 6, 2007 8:38 PM, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 02:18:08PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 04:04:20 PST, Andrew Morton said:
> >
> > > > >
> > > > >
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 12:28:58AM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
>
> >> Why release the spinlock here? It's done after the count is incremented.
> >> This patch does not seem correct.
> >
> > Doh, you are correct, I'll make sure that I fix this up before applying
> > it.
> >
> >
On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 11:38:43 PST, Greg KH said:
> > Would I be remiss in hypothesising that something in gregkh-driver-kobject-*
> > changed something, and now we need a agk-dm-dm-kobject-fixupage.patch?
>
> I don't know, it all depends on what is in the dm patches. Hopefully
> everything that I
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 11:49:59PM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
> Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
> > Hi Andrew,
> >
> > The 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 kernel build fails with build failure,
> >
> > CC drivers/char/hvcs.o
> > drivers/char/hvcs.c: In function ‘hvcs_open’:
> > drivers/char/hvcs.c:1180: error:
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 02:18:08PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 04:04:20 PST, Andrew Morton said:
>
> > > >
> > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.24-rc4/2.6.24-rc4-mm1/
> > >
> > > Something in here broke LVM support - an initrd
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 08:52:29AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> >> git-scsi-misc.patch
> >
> > Apologies for not looking into the problem earlier. See
> > http://marc.info/?t=11962802235=1=2
> > "2.6.24-rc3-mm2: Result: hostbyte=0x01 driverbyte=0x00\nend_request:
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 00:28 +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
>
> >> Why release the spinlock here? It's done after the count is incremented.
> >> This patch does not seem correct.
> >
> > Doh, you are correct, I'll make sure that I fix this up before applying
> > it.
> >
> > thanks,
On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 04:04:20 PST, Andrew Morton said:
> > >
> > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.24-rc4/2.6.24-rc4-mm1/
> >
> > Something in here broke LVM support - an initrd that has worked fine for
> > quite some time suddenly couldn't mount
Greg KH wrote:
>> Why release the spinlock here? It's done after the count is incremented.
>> This patch does not seem correct.
>
> Doh, you are correct, I'll make sure that I fix this up before applying
> it.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Hi, Greg,
I ran some tests with the fixed up version of
Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 11:49:59PM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
>> Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
>>> Hi Andrew,
>>>
>>> The 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 kernel build fails with build failure,
>>>
>>> CC drivers/char/hvcs.o
>>> drivers/char/hvcs.c: In function ‘hvcs_open’:
>>>
Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> The 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 kernel build fails with build failure,
>
> CC drivers/char/hvcs.o
> drivers/char/hvcs.c: In function ‘hvcs_open’:
> drivers/char/hvcs.c:1180: error: wrong type argument to unary exclamation mark
> make[2]: ***
On Thu, Dec 06 2007, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> >> git-scsi-misc.patch
> >
> > Apologies for not looking into the problem earlier. See
> > http://marc.info/?t=11962802235=1=2
> > "2.6.24-rc3-mm2: Result: hostbyte=0x01 driverbyte=0x00\nend_request: I/O
> > error"
> >
On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 06:49:24 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Dec 2007 21:17:01 PST, Andrew Morton said:
> >
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.24-rc4/2.6.24-rc4-mm1/
>
> Something in here broke LVM support - an initrd that has worked fine for
>
On Tue, 04 Dec 2007 21:17:01 PST, Andrew Morton said:
>
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.24-rc4/2.6.24-rc4-mm1/
Something in here broke LVM support - an initrd that has worked fine for
quite some time suddenly couldn't mount /dev/VolGroup00/root so we get the
On Tue, 04 Dec 2007 21:17:01 PST, Andrew Morton said:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.24-rc4/2.6.24-rc4-mm1/
Something in here broke LVM support - an initrd that has worked fine for
quite some time suddenly couldn't mount /dev/VolGroup00/root so we get the
On Thu, Dec 06 2007, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
git-scsi-misc.patch
Apologies for not looking into the problem earlier. See
http://marc.info/?t=11962802235r=1w=2
2.6.24-rc3-mm2: Result: hostbyte=0x01 driverbyte=0x00\nend_request: I/O
error
for previous
On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 06:49:24 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 04 Dec 2007 21:17:01 PST, Andrew Morton said:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.24-rc4/2.6.24-rc4-mm1/
Something in here broke LVM support - an initrd that has worked fine for
quite
Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
Hi Andrew,
The 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 kernel build fails with build failure,
CC drivers/char/hvcs.o
drivers/char/hvcs.c: In function ‘hvcs_open’:
drivers/char/hvcs.c:1180: error: wrong type argument to unary exclamation mark
make[2]: *** [drivers/char/hvcs.o] Error
Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 11:49:59PM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
Hi Andrew,
The 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 kernel build fails with build failure,
CC drivers/char/hvcs.o
drivers/char/hvcs.c: In function ‘hvcs_open’:
drivers/char/hvcs.c:1180: error: wrong type
Greg KH wrote:
Why release the spinlock here? It's done after the count is incremented.
This patch does not seem correct.
Doh, you are correct, I'll make sure that I fix this up before applying
it.
thanks,
greg k-h
Hi, Greg,
I ran some tests with the fixed up version of this patch
On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 04:04:20 PST, Andrew Morton said:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.24-rc4/2.6.24-rc4-mm1/
Something in here broke LVM support - an initrd that has worked fine for
quite some time suddenly couldn't mount /dev/VolGroup00/root so
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 00:28 +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
Greg KH wrote:
Why release the spinlock here? It's done after the count is incremented.
This patch does not seem correct.
Doh, you are correct, I'll make sure that I fix this up before applying
it.
thanks,
greg k-h
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 08:52:29AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
git-scsi-misc.patch
Apologies for not looking into the problem earlier. See
http://marc.info/?t=11962802235r=1w=2
2.6.24-rc3-mm2: Result: hostbyte=0x01 driverbyte=0x00\nend_request: I/O
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 02:18:08PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 04:04:20 PST, Andrew Morton said:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.24-rc4/2.6.24-rc4-mm1/
Something in here broke LVM support - an initrd that has worked
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 11:49:59PM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
Hi Andrew,
The 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 kernel build fails with build failure,
CC drivers/char/hvcs.o
drivers/char/hvcs.c: In function ‘hvcs_open’:
drivers/char/hvcs.c:1180: error: wrong type
On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 11:38:43 PST, Greg KH said:
Would I be remiss in hypothesising that something in gregkh-driver-kobject-*
changed something, and now we need a agk-dm-dm-kobject-fixupage.patch?
I don't know, it all depends on what is in the dm patches. Hopefully
everything that I have
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 12:28:58AM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
Greg KH wrote:
Why release the spinlock here? It's done after the count is incremented.
This patch does not seem correct.
Doh, you are correct, I'll make sure that I fix this up before applying
it.
thanks,
greg
On Dec 6, 2007 8:38 PM, Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 02:18:08PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 04:04:20 PST, Andrew Morton said:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.24-rc4/2.6.24-rc4-mm1/
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 11:04:12PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
A fix for LVM to handle symlinks instead of directories is in the LVM
CVS tree, but there wasn't a release since August.
I released it yesterday:-)
Alasdair
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
Le 05.12.2007 06:17, Andrew Morton a écrit :
Temporarily at
http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.24-rc4-mm1/
Will appear later at
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.24-rc4/2.6.24-rc4-mm1/
LDS arch/x86/vdso/vdso32/vdso32.lds
AS
On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 23:28:38 +0100
Laurent Riffard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le 05.12.2007 06:17, Andrew Morton a écrit :
Temporarily at
http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.24-rc4-mm1/
Will appear later at
On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 18:12 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 23:04:12 +0100, Kay Sievers said:
What's the value of SYSFS_DEPRECATED? Care to set it to yes, if it isn't,
and try again?
I *knew* there was a D'Oh! error in here. ;)
Bisection is fast closing in on
How can I find Roland's patches, so I can try backing them out?
I looked in the broken out patches and only saw one related
to VDSO. Backing it out did not help. I tried searching for
messages to LKML sent by roland but mostly got a bunch of
folks sending spam.
Thanks,
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 18:28:25 -0500
Miles Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How can I find Roland's patches, so I can try backing them out?
I looked in the broken out patches and only saw one related
to VDSO. Backing it out did not help. I tried searching for
messages to LKML sent by roland but
On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 23:04:12 +0100, Kay Sievers said:
What's the value of SYSFS_DEPRECATED? Care to set it to yes, if it isn't,
and try again?
I *knew* there was a D'Oh! error in here. ;)
Bisection is fast closing in on gregkh-driver-block-device.patch, which broke
my LVM almost the exact
I found:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernelm=119550978915647w=2
through
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernelm=119551057816829w=2
(I was unable to locate the 6th patch in the set)
When I tried backing out the patches, there were tons of errors. I
guess I'll punt on trying to build this MM tree. Sorry.
On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 12:31 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 12:28:58AM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
Greg KH wrote:
Why release the spinlock here? It's done after the count is incremented.
This patch does not seem correct.
Doh, you are correct, I'll make sure that I
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 03:54:51PM -0800, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 12:31 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 12:28:58AM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
Greg KH wrote:
Why release the spinlock here? It's done after the count is
incremented.
This
Badari Pulavarty wrote:
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 00:28 +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
Greg KH wrote:
Why release the spinlock here? It's done after the count is incremented.
This patch does not seem correct.
Doh, you are correct, I'll make sure that I fix this up before applying
it.
thanks,
Hi,
2.6.24-rc4-mm1 build failed at drivers/net/wireless/ath5k/base.c for some
inline functions like this:
drivers/net/wireless/ath5k/base.c:292: sorry, unimplemented: inlining failed in
call to 'ath5k_extend_tsf': function body not available
fix it with adjust the order of inline function
Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 03:54:51PM -0800, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 12:31 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 12:28:58AM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
Greg KH wrote:
Why release the spinlock here? It's done after the count is incremented.
This patch
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 08:32:26AM +0530, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 03:54:51PM -0800, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 12:31 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 12:28:58AM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
Greg KH wrote:
Why release
Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
>> git-scsi-misc.patch
>
> Apologies for not looking into the problem earlier. See
> http://marc.info/?t=11962802235=1=2
> "2.6.24-rc3-mm2: Result: hostbyte=0x01 driverbyte=0x00\nend_request: I/O
> error"
> for previous installment.
>
> I've bisected it to the
On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 17:59:37 +1100 Reuben Farrelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/12/2007 4:17 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Temporarily at
> >
> > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.24-rc4-mm1/
> >
> > Will appear later at
> >
> >
> >
On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 08:45:37 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> The 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 kernel build fails on s390x,
>
> CC arch/s390/kernel/traps.o
> In file included from include/asm/thread_info.h:39,
> from include/linux/thread_info.h:21,
>
From: Reuben Farrelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2007 17:59:37 +1100
> On 5/12/2007 4:17 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > - Lots of device IDs have been removed from the e1000 driver and moved over
> > to e1000e. So if your e1000 stops working, you forgot to set
> > CONFIG_E1000E.
>
>
On 5/12/2007 4:17 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
Temporarily at
http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.24-rc4-mm1/
Will appear later at
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.24-rc4/2.6.24-rc4-mm1/
- Lots of device IDs have been removed from the e1000 driver and moved
Hi Andrew,
The 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 kernel build fails on s390x,
CC arch/s390/kernel/traps.o
In file included from include/asm/thread_info.h:39,
from include/linux/thread_info.h:21,
from include/linux/preempt.h:9,
from
On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 07:42:02PM +0530, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> The 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 kernel build fails with build failure,
>
> CC drivers/char/hvcs.o
> drivers/char/hvcs.c: In function ‘hvcs_open’:
> drivers/char/hvcs.c:1180: error: wrong type argument to unary
On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 06:41:40PM +0530, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 03:15:15AM -0600, Olof Johansson wrote:
> > powerpc allyesconfig fails on the following two drivers (iseries_defconfig
> > fails for the veth one):
> >
> > drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.c: In function
Hi Andrew,
The 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 kernel build fails with build failure,
CC drivers/char/hvcs.o
drivers/char/hvcs.c: In function ‘hvcs_open’:
drivers/char/hvcs.c:1180: error: wrong type argument to unary exclamation mark
make[2]: *** [drivers/char/hvcs.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [drivers/char]
On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 03:15:15AM -0600, Olof Johansson wrote:
> powerpc allyesconfig fails on the following two drivers (iseries_defconfig
> fails for the veth one):
>
> drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.c: In function 'ehea_driver_sysfs_add':
> drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.c:2812: error: 'struct
101 - 200 of 210 matches
Mail list logo
