On Sat, 2007-03-17 at 13:03 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Saturday 17 March 2007, Mike Galbraith wrote:
[...]
Xorg is using 50% cpu because I'm asking it to.
What advantage is that giving you?
It's a test scenario. Read the thread please, I really don't want to
repeat myself endlessly.
On 3/17/07, Mike Galbraith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2007-03-17 at 13:03 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Saturday 17 March 2007, Mike Galbraith wrote:
[...]
Xorg is using 50% cpu because I'm asking it to.
What advantage is that giving you?
It's a test scenario. Read the thread
On Sat, 2007-03-17 at 19:23 +0100, Kacper Wysocki wrote:
And for Mark and others who are as confused as I was, this is the
thread that Mike meant to reference:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/503455/focus=6614
Nope, with all the back and forth (and noise), I lost track of which
Mike Galbraith wrote:
On Sat, 2007-03-17 at 20:48 +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
The most frustrating part of a discussion of this nature on lkml is that
earlier information in a thread seems to be long forgotten after a few
days and all that is left is the one reporter having a problem.
One?
On Sat, 2007-03-17 at 23:55 +0300, Al Boldi wrote:
Mike, I'm not saying RSDL is perfect, but v0.31 is by far better than
mainline. Try this easy test:
startx with the vesa driver
run reflect from the mesa5.0-demos
load 5 cpu-hogs
start moving the mouse
On my desktop, mainline
On Sun, 2007-03-18 at 07:17 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
On Sat, 2007-03-17 at 23:55 +0300, Al Boldi wrote:
Mike, I'm not saying RSDL is perfect, but v0.31 is by far better than
mainline. Try this easy test:
startx with the vesa driver
run reflect from the mesa5.0-demos
load 5
On Sat, 2007-03-17 at 06:56 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 21:24 -0700, Nicholas Miell wrote:
>
> > Sorry, I haven't really been following this thread and now I'm confused.
> >
> > You're saying that it's somehow the scheduler's fault that X isn't
> > running with a high
P.S. "utter failure" was too harsh. What sticks in my craw is that the
world has to adjust to fit this new scheduler.
-Mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 21:24 -0700, Nicholas Miell wrote:
> Sorry, I haven't really been following this thread and now I'm confused.
>
> You're saying that it's somehow the scheduler's fault that X isn't
> running with a high enough priority?
I'm saying that the current scheduler adjusts for
Greetings Con & company;
I built and rebooted to 2.6.20.3-rdsl-0.31 earlier this evening, but
purposely waited till amanda was well underway to make a report.
The report is that I really really have to work hard to tell that amanda
is running even though the cpu according to gkrellm is running
On Saturday 17 March 2007 15:40, Al Boldi wrote:
> Con Kolivas wrote:
> > On Saturday 17 March 2007 08:55, Al Boldi wrote:
> > > With X nice'd at -10, and 11 hogs loading the cpu, interactivity looks
> > > good until the default timeslice/quota is exhausted and slows down.
> > > Maybe adjusting
Con Kolivas wrote:
> On Saturday 17 March 2007 08:55, Al Boldi wrote:
> > With X nice'd at -10, and 11 hogs loading the cpu, interactivity looks
> > good until the default timeslice/quota is exhausted and slows down.
> > Maybe adjusting this according to nice could help.
>
> Not sure what you
On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 23:30 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-03-17 at 08:13 +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
> > On Saturday 17 March 2007 02:34, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2007-03-17 at 00:40 +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
> > > > Here are full patches for rsdl 0.31 for various base
On Saturday 17 March 2007 08:55, Al Boldi wrote:
> Con Kolivas wrote:
> > Here are full patches for rsdl 0.31 for various base kernels. A full
> > announce with a fresh -mm series will follow...
> >
> > http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/staircase-deadline/2.6.20.3-rsdl-0.31.patch
>
> Thanks! It looks
Freitag, 16. März 2007 wrote Mike Galbraith:
> On Sat, 2007-03-17 at 08:13 +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
> > On Saturday 17 March 2007 02:34, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2007-03-17 at 00:40 +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
> > > > Here are full patches for rsdl 0.31 for various base kernels. A full
>
On Sat, 2007-03-17 at 08:13 +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
> On Saturday 17 March 2007 02:34, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Sat, 2007-03-17 at 00:40 +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
> > > Here are full patches for rsdl 0.31 for various base kernels. A full
> > > announce with a fresh -mm series will follow...
Con Kolivas wrote:
> Here are full patches for rsdl 0.31 for various base kernels. A full
> announce with a fresh -mm series will follow...
>
> http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/staircase-deadline/2.6.20.3-rsdl-0.31.patch
Thanks! It looks much better now.
With X nice'd at -10, and 11 hogs loading
On Saturday 17 March 2007 02:34, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-03-17 at 00:40 +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
> > Here are full patches for rsdl 0.31 for various base kernels. A full
> > announce with a fresh -mm series will follow...
> >
> >
AshMilsted wrote:
Con Kolivas writes:
Here are full patches for rsdl 0.31 for various base kernels. A full announce
with a fresh -mm series will follow...
http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/staircase-deadline/2.6.20.3-rsdl-0.31.patch
Con Kolivas writes:
> Here are full patches for rsdl 0.31 for various base kernels. A full announce
> with a fresh -mm series will follow...
>
> http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/staircase-deadline/2.6.20.3-rsdl-0.31.patch
>
On Sat, 2007-03-17 at 00:40 +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
> Here are full patches for rsdl 0.31 for various base kernels. A full announce
> with a fresh -mm series will follow...
>
> http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/staircase-deadline/2.6.20.3-rsdl-0.31.patch
>
On Sat, 2007-03-17 at 00:40 +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
Here are full patches for rsdl 0.31 for various base kernels. A full announce
with a fresh -mm series will follow...
http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/staircase-deadline/2.6.20.3-rsdl-0.31.patch
Con Kolivas writes:
Here are full patches for rsdl 0.31 for various base kernels. A full announce
with a fresh -mm series will follow...
http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/staircase-deadline/2.6.20.3-rsdl-0.31.patch
AshMilsted wrote:
Con Kolivas writes:
Here are full patches for rsdl 0.31 for various base kernels. A full announce
with a fresh -mm series will follow...
http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/staircase-deadline/2.6.20.3-rsdl-0.31.patch
On Saturday 17 March 2007 02:34, Mike Galbraith wrote:
On Sat, 2007-03-17 at 00:40 +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
Here are full patches for rsdl 0.31 for various base kernels. A full
announce with a fresh -mm series will follow...
Con Kolivas wrote:
Here are full patches for rsdl 0.31 for various base kernels. A full
announce with a fresh -mm series will follow...
http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/staircase-deadline/2.6.20.3-rsdl-0.31.patch
Thanks! It looks much better now.
With X nice'd at -10, and 11 hogs loading the
On Sat, 2007-03-17 at 08:13 +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
On Saturday 17 March 2007 02:34, Mike Galbraith wrote:
On Sat, 2007-03-17 at 00:40 +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
Here are full patches for rsdl 0.31 for various base kernels. A full
announce with a fresh -mm series will follow...
Freitag, 16. März 2007 wrote Mike Galbraith:
On Sat, 2007-03-17 at 08:13 +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
On Saturday 17 March 2007 02:34, Mike Galbraith wrote:
On Sat, 2007-03-17 at 00:40 +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
Here are full patches for rsdl 0.31 for various base kernels. A full
On Saturday 17 March 2007 08:55, Al Boldi wrote:
Con Kolivas wrote:
Here are full patches for rsdl 0.31 for various base kernels. A full
announce with a fresh -mm series will follow...
http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/staircase-deadline/2.6.20.3-rsdl-0.31.patch
Thanks! It looks much
On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 23:30 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
On Sat, 2007-03-17 at 08:13 +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
On Saturday 17 March 2007 02:34, Mike Galbraith wrote:
On Sat, 2007-03-17 at 00:40 +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
Here are full patches for rsdl 0.31 for various base kernels. A full
Con Kolivas wrote:
On Saturday 17 March 2007 08:55, Al Boldi wrote:
With X nice'd at -10, and 11 hogs loading the cpu, interactivity looks
good until the default timeslice/quota is exhausted and slows down.
Maybe adjusting this according to nice could help.
Not sure what you mean by
On Saturday 17 March 2007 15:40, Al Boldi wrote:
Con Kolivas wrote:
On Saturday 17 March 2007 08:55, Al Boldi wrote:
With X nice'd at -10, and 11 hogs loading the cpu, interactivity looks
good until the default timeslice/quota is exhausted and slows down.
Maybe adjusting this according
Greetings Con company;
I built and rebooted to 2.6.20.3-rdsl-0.31 earlier this evening, but
purposely waited till amanda was well underway to make a report.
The report is that I really really have to work hard to tell that amanda
is running even though the cpu according to gkrellm is running
On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 21:24 -0700, Nicholas Miell wrote:
Sorry, I haven't really been following this thread and now I'm confused.
You're saying that it's somehow the scheduler's fault that X isn't
running with a high enough priority?
I'm saying that the current scheduler adjusts for
P.S. utter failure was too harsh. What sticks in my craw is that the
world has to adjust to fit this new scheduler.
-Mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
On Sat, 2007-03-17 at 06:56 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 21:24 -0700, Nicholas Miell wrote:
Sorry, I haven't really been following this thread and now I'm confused.
You're saying that it's somehow the scheduler's fault that X isn't
running with a high enough
201 - 236 of 236 matches
Mail list logo
