Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 6 (mm/memory_failure.c)

2020-07-06 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 7/6/20 5:35 PM, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 09:59:06AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> On 7/6/20 12:40 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Changes since 20200703: >>> >> >> on i386: >> >> when CONFIG_MIGRATION is not set/enabled: >> >> ../mm/memory-failure.c: In

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 6 (mm/memory_failure.c)

2020-07-06 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, On Tue, 7 Jul 2020 09:35:15 +0900 Joonsoo Kim wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 09:59:06AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > > on i386: > > > > when CONFIG_MIGRATION is not set/enabled: > > > > ../mm/memory-failure.c: In function ‘new_page’: > > ../mm/memory-failure.c:1688:9: error:

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 6 (mm/memory_failure.c)

2020-07-06 Thread Joonsoo Kim
On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 09:59:06AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 7/6/20 12:40 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Changes since 20200703: > > > > on i386: > > when CONFIG_MIGRATION is not set/enabled: > > ../mm/memory-failure.c: In function ‘new_page’: >

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 6 (mm/memory_failure.c)

2020-07-06 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 7/6/20 12:40 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20200703: > on i386: when CONFIG_MIGRATION is not set/enabled: ../mm/memory-failure.c: In function ‘new_page’: ../mm/memory-failure.c:1688:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘alloc_migration_target’; did you mean