Re: (usagi-core 32640) Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH 0/2] [SERIAL] [USB] fixed to skip NULL entry in struct serial usb_serial_port.
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 09:38:15AM +0900, Noriaki TAKAMIYA wrote: > Hi, > > >> Sun, 25 Mar 2007 08:55:21 -0700 > >> [Subject: (usagi-core 32640) Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH 0/2] [SERIAL] > >> [USB] fixed to skip NULL entry in struct serial usb_serial_port.] > >> Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote... > > > > Yes, this problem was already fixed. > > > > Great, thanks for testing. So I guess both of these patches are no > > longer necessary, right? > > I think so. But I wonder if usb_get_serial_port_data() should check > the argument for the other drivers. I don't think it is really necessary, do you? thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: (usagi-core 32640) Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH 0/2] [SERIAL] [USB] fixed to skip NULL entry in struct serial usb_serial_port.
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 09:38:15AM +0900, Noriaki TAKAMIYA wrote: Hi, Sun, 25 Mar 2007 08:55:21 -0700 [Subject: (usagi-core 32640) Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH 0/2] [SERIAL] [USB] fixed to skip NULL entry in struct serial usb_serial_port.] Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote... Yes, this problem was already fixed. Great, thanks for testing. So I guess both of these patches are no longer necessary, right? I think so. But I wonder if usb_get_serial_port_data() should check the argument for the other drivers. I don't think it is really necessary, do you? thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: (usagi-core 32640) Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH 0/2] [SERIAL] [USB] fixed to skip NULL entry in struct serial usb_serial_port.
Hi, >> Sun, 25 Mar 2007 08:55:21 -0700 >> [Subject: (usagi-core 32640) Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH 0/2] [SERIAL] >> [USB] fixed to skip NULL entry in struct serial usb_serial_port.] >> Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote... > > Yes, this problem was already fixed. > > Great, thanks for testing. So I guess both of these patches are no > longer necessary, right? I think so. But I wonder if usb_get_serial_port_data() should check the argument for the other drivers. Regards, -- Noriaki TAKAMIYA - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: (usagi-core 32640) Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH 0/2] [SERIAL] [USB] fixed to skip NULL entry in struct serial usb_serial_port.
Hi, Sun, 25 Mar 2007 08:55:21 -0700 [Subject: (usagi-core 32640) Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH 0/2] [SERIAL] [USB] fixed to skip NULL entry in struct serial usb_serial_port.] Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote... Yes, this problem was already fixed. Great, thanks for testing. So I guess both of these patches are no longer necessary, right? I think so. But I wonder if usb_get_serial_port_data() should check the argument for the other drivers. Regards, -- Noriaki TAKAMIYA - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
