On 12/19, Neil Horman wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 05:22:30PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> I wouldn't worry about it. After looking over the changes Eric just had
> merged
> for 3.8 I'm becomming more convinced that this isn't really needed anymore.
> With
> his changes, we can
On 12/19, Neil Horman wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 05:22:30PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
I wouldn't worry about it. After looking over the changes Eric just had
merged
for 3.8 I'm becomming more convinced that this isn't really needed anymore.
With
his changes, we can migrate a
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 05:22:30PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 12/18, Neil Horman wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 09:06:04PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > > > Perhaps its best just to restrict this patch to adjusting the root fs
> > > > location
> > > > for the chroot case.
> > >
>
On 12/18, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
> Neil Horman writes:
>
> > On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 09:06:04PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >>
> >> Yes, and we probably want to change pid_ns as well. But afaics currently
> >> this is not possible, even setns can't do this.
>
> The code for setns to change
On 12/18, Neil Horman wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 09:06:04PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > > Perhaps its best just to restrict this patch to adjusting the root fs
> > > location
> > > for the chroot case.
> >
> > Probably... at least for the start.
> >
> > BTW. Of course this is
On 12/18, Neil Horman wrote:
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 09:06:04PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
Perhaps its best just to restrict this patch to adjusting the root fs
location
for the chroot case.
Probably... at least for the start.
BTW. Of course this is subjective, but personally
On 12/18, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Neil Horman nhor...@tuxdriver.com writes:
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 09:06:04PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
Yes, and we probably want to change pid_ns as well. But afaics currently
this is not possible, even setns can't do this.
The code for setns to
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 05:22:30PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
On 12/18, Neil Horman wrote:
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 09:06:04PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
Perhaps its best just to restrict this patch to adjusting the root fs
location
for the chroot case.
Probably... at
Neil Horman writes:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 12:45:18PM -0800, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> The code for setns to change the pid namespace just merged.
>>
> Can you post a link to the merge commit for reference so I can take a look at
> it?
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 12:45:18PM -0800, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Neil Horman writes:
>
> > On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 09:06:04PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >> On 12/17, Neil Horman wrote:
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 05:04:08PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > Is
Neil Horman writes:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 09:06:04PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>> On 12/17, Neil Horman wrote:
>> >
>> > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 05:04:08PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Is there a way to switch all namespaces, except for the pid
>> > > > namespace?
>> > >
>>
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 09:06:04PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 12/17, Neil Horman wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 05:04:08PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > >
> > > > Is there a way to switch all namespaces, except for the pid
> > > > namespace?
> > >
> > > Which exactly namespaces you
On 12/17, Neil Horman wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 05:04:08PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> > > Is there a way to switch all namespaces, except for the pid
> > > namespace?
> >
> > Which exactly namespaces you want to change?
> >
> Ideally, I want the pipe reader process to execute in
On 12/17, Neil Horman wrote:
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 05:04:08PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
Is there a way to switch all namespaces, except for the pid
namespace?
Which exactly namespaces you want to change?
Ideally, I want the pipe reader process to execute in the same namespaces
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 09:06:04PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
On 12/17, Neil Horman wrote:
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 05:04:08PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
Is there a way to switch all namespaces, except for the pid
namespace?
Which exactly namespaces you want to change?
Neil Horman nhor...@tuxdriver.com writes:
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 09:06:04PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
On 12/17, Neil Horman wrote:
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 05:04:08PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
Is there a way to switch all namespaces, except for the pid
namespace?
Which
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 12:45:18PM -0800, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Neil Horman nhor...@tuxdriver.com writes:
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 09:06:04PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
On 12/17, Neil Horman wrote:
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 05:04:08PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
Is there a
Neil Horman nhor...@tuxdriver.com writes:
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 12:45:18PM -0800, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
The code for setns to change the pid namespace just merged.
Can you post a link to the merge commit for reference so I can take a look at
it?
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 05:04:08PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 12/17, Neil Horman wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 01:34:28PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > > @@ -455,6 +468,14 @@ static int umh_pipe_setup(struct subproc
> > > /* and disallow core files too */
> > >
On 12/17, Neil Horman wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 01:34:28PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > @@ -455,6 +468,14 @@ static int umh_pipe_setup(struct subproc
> > /* and disallow core files too */
> > current->signal->rlim[RLIMIT_CORE] = (struct rlimit){1, 1};
> >
> > +
> > + if
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 01:34:28PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> @@ -455,6 +468,14 @@ static int umh_pipe_setup(struct subproc
> /* and disallow core files too */
> current->signal->rlim[RLIMIT_CORE] = (struct rlimit){1, 1};
>
> +
> + if (cp->switch_ns) {
> +
@@ -455,6 +468,14 @@ static int umh_pipe_setup(struct subproc
/* and disallow core files too */
current->signal->rlim[RLIMIT_CORE] = (struct rlimit){1, 1};
+
+ if (cp->switch_ns) {
+ get_fs_root(cp->cprocess->fs, );
+ set_fs_root(current->fs, );
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 05:04:08PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
On 12/17, Neil Horman wrote:
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 01:34:28PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
@@ -455,6 +468,14 @@ static int umh_pipe_setup(struct subproc
/* and disallow core files too */
@@ -455,6 +468,14 @@ static int umh_pipe_setup(struct subproc
/* and disallow core files too */
current-signal-rlim[RLIMIT_CORE] = (struct rlimit){1, 1};
+
+ if (cp-switch_ns) {
+ get_fs_root(cp-cprocess-fs, root);
+ set_fs_root(current-fs,
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 01:34:28PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
@@ -455,6 +468,14 @@ static int umh_pipe_setup(struct subproc
/* and disallow core files too */
current-signal-rlim[RLIMIT_CORE] = (struct rlimit){1, 1};
+
+ if (cp-switch_ns) {
+
On 12/17, Neil Horman wrote:
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 01:34:28PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
@@ -455,6 +468,14 @@ static int umh_pipe_setup(struct subproc
/* and disallow core files too */
current-signal-rlim[RLIMIT_CORE] = (struct rlimit){1, 1};
+
+ if (cp-switch_ns) {
+
26 matches
Mail list logo
