re, Donald C; Rose,
> Gregory
> V; Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P; Duyck, Alexander H; Ronciak, John; Dave, Tushar N;
> e1000-de...@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: /sys/module/pcie_aspm/parameters/policy not writable?
>
> Hi!
>
> > > &g
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 8:13 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hmm. So I've update bios using 7buj28uc.iso . Reverted the patches and
> yes, ping latencies are still bad:
Wow. I can hardly believe how bad this is (assuming Windows has the
same problem). Thanks a lot for checking this out.
>> >>
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 8:13 PM, Pavel Machek pa...@ucw.cz wrote:
Hmm. So I've update bios using 7buj28uc.iso . Reverted the patches and
yes, ping latencies are still bad:
Wow. I can hardly believe how bad this is (assuming Windows has the
same problem). Thanks a lot for checking this out.
; Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P; Duyck, Alexander H; Ronciak, John; Dave, Tushar N;
e1000-de...@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: /sys/module/pcie_aspm/parameters/policy not writable?
Hi!
If there's patch, I'll gladly try it :-). Thanks
Hi!
> >> > But since the problem also occurs with Windows, it's pretty likely
> >> > that there's a BIOS update to fix it. I notice on the X60 support
> >> > page that there are several versions newer than what you're running.
> >>
> >> Do you have any interest in trying a newer BIOS to see if
Hi!
> >> > But since the problem also occurs with Windows, it's pretty likely
> >> > that there's a BIOS update to fix it. I notice on the X60 support
> >> > page that there are several versions newer than what you're running.
> >>
> >> Do you have any interest in trying a newer BIOS to see if
Hi!
> > > If there's patch, I'll gladly try it :-). Thanks,
> > >
> > Pavel
> > Thanks Pavel,
>
> Minor fix. Missed a bracket removal Please use this for your testing
> instead.
>
Seems to work here. (I did testing on 3.11-rc, but
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> > But since the problem also occurs with Windows, it's pretty likely
>> > that there's a BIOS update to fix it. I notice on the X60 support
>> > page that there are several versions newer than what you're running.
>>
>> Do you have
Hi!
> > But since the problem also occurs with Windows, it's pretty likely
> > that there's a BIOS update to fix it. I notice on the X60 support
> > page that there are several versions newer than what you're running.
>
> Do you have any interest in trying a newer BIOS to see if it's fixed
>
effrey T;
>> Brandeburg, Jesse; Allan, Bruce W; Wyborny, Carolyn; Skidmore, Donald C;
>> Rose, Gregory V; Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P; Duyck, Alexander H; Ronciak, John;
>> Dave, Tushar N; e1000-de...@lists.sourceforge.net
>> Subject: Re: /sys/module/pcie_aspm/parameters/polic
egory
> V; Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P; Duyck, Alexander H; Ronciak, John; Dave, Tushar N;
> e1000-de...@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: RE: /sys/module/pcie_aspm/parameters/policy not writable?
>
> [..]
> > If the
, Donald C;
> Rose, Gregory V; Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P; Duyck, Alexander H; Ronciak, John;
> Dave, Tushar N; e1000-de...@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: /sys/module/pcie_aspm/parameters/policy not writable?
>
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>
&g
[..]
> If there's patch, I'll gladly try it :-). Thanks,
>
Pavel
Thanks Pavel,
It ended up taking more time than I thought. The checking of whether ASPM is
really enabled or not is, unfortunately, not as straightforward as I
On Wed, 2013-07-10 at 13:57 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> [+cc Jeff, Jesse, et al, e1000-devel]
>
> Holy cow, you guys have a lot of folks listed in MAINTAINERS for Intel
> drivers :) This is an ASPM question, if that helps narrow down the
> folks interested.
Bruce Allan is the e1000e
On Wed, 2013-07-10 at 13:57 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
[+cc Jeff, Jesse, et al, e1000-devel]
Holy cow, you guys have a lot of folks listed in MAINTAINERS for Intel
drivers :) This is an ASPM question, if that helps narrow down the
folks interested.
Bruce Allan is the e1000e maintainer, I
[..]
If there's patch, I'll gladly try it :-). Thanks,
Pavel
Thanks Pavel,
It ended up taking more time than I thought. The checking of whether ASPM is
really enabled or not is, unfortunately, not as straightforward as I
V; Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P; Duyck, Alexander H; Ronciak, John;
Dave, Tushar N; e1000-de...@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: /sys/module/pcie_aspm/parameters/policy not writable?
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Bjorn Helgaas bhelg...@google.com wrote:
Just to make sure I understand you
P; Duyck, Alexander H; Ronciak, John; Dave, Tushar N;
e1000-de...@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: /sys/module/pcie_aspm/parameters/policy not writable?
[..]
If there's patch, I'll gladly try it :-). Thanks,
Pavel
Thanks
;
Brandeburg, Jesse; Allan, Bruce W; Wyborny, Carolyn; Skidmore, Donald C;
Rose, Gregory V; Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P; Duyck, Alexander H; Ronciak, John;
Dave, Tushar N; e1000-de...@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: /sys/module/pcie_aspm/parameters/policy not writable?
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 11:46 AM
Hi!
But since the problem also occurs with Windows, it's pretty likely
that there's a BIOS update to fix it. I notice on the X60 support
page that there are several versions newer than what you're running.
Do you have any interest in trying a newer BIOS to see if it's fixed
there? If
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Pavel Machek pa...@ucw.cz wrote:
Hi!
But since the problem also occurs with Windows, it's pretty likely
that there's a BIOS update to fix it. I notice on the X60 support
page that there are several versions newer than what you're running.
Do you have any
Hi!
If there's patch, I'll gladly try it :-). Thanks,
Pavel
Thanks Pavel,
Minor fix. Missed a bracket removal Please use this for your testing
instead.
Seems to work here. (I did testing on 3.11-rc, but that should
Hi!
But since the problem also occurs with Windows, it's pretty likely
that there's a BIOS update to fix it. I notice on the X60 support
page that there are several versions newer than what you're running.
Do you have any interest in trying a newer BIOS to see if it's fixed
there?
Hi!
But since the problem also occurs with Windows, it's pretty likely
that there's a BIOS update to fix it. I notice on the X60 support
page that there are several versions newer than what you're running.
Do you have any interest in trying a newer BIOS to see if it's fixed
there?
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> Just to make sure I understand you correctly: I think you are saying
> that the NIC has the same problem under Windows.
Can you confirm or deny that the same problem occurs with Windows?
> But since the problem also occurs with Windows,
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Bjorn Helgaas bhelg...@google.com wrote:
Just to make sure I understand you correctly: I think you are saying
that the NIC has the same problem under Windows.
Can you confirm or deny that the same problem occurs with Windows?
But since the problem also
On Wed 2013-07-24 15:19:55, Wyborny, Carolyn wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Bjorn Helgaas [mailto:bhelg...@google.com]
> [..}
> >
> > We *could* consider something like this, since its scope is limited.
> > But since the problem also occurs with Windows, it's pretty likely that
>
On Wed 2013-07-24 15:19:55, Wyborny, Carolyn wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Bjorn Helgaas [mailto:bhelg...@google.com]
[..}
We *could* consider something like this, since its scope is limited.
But since the problem also occurs with Windows, it's pretty likely that
there's a
> -Original Message-
> From: Bjorn Helgaas [mailto:bhelg...@google.com]
[..}
>
> We *could* consider something like this, since its scope is limited.
> But since the problem also occurs with Windows, it's pretty likely that
> there's a
> BIOS update to fix it. I notice on the X60 support
-Original Message-
From: Bjorn Helgaas [mailto:bhelg...@google.com]
[..}
We *could* consider something like this, since its scope is limited.
But since the problem also occurs with Windows, it's pretty likely that
there's a
BIOS update to fix it. I notice on the X60 support page
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 5:11 AM, Pavel Machek wrote:
>> Pavel's ThinkPad X60 has two NICs: Intel 82573L and Intel PRO/Wireless
>> 3945ABG. I'm pretty sure the problem he's reporting is with the
>> 82573L. Ping times are bad (~100msec) when ASPM is enabled, as
>> reported by lspci.
>
> Yep.
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 5:11 AM, Pavel Machek pa...@ucw.cz wrote:
Pavel's ThinkPad X60 has two NICs: Intel 82573L and Intel PRO/Wireless
3945ABG. I'm pretty sure the problem he's reporting is with the
82573L. Ping times are bad (~100msec) when ASPM is enabled, as
reported by lspci.
Yep.
Hi!
> > > Pavel's ThinkPad X60 has two NICs: Intel 82573L and Intel PRO/Wireless
> > > 3945ABG. I'm pretty sure the problem he's reporting is with the 82573L.
> > > Ping
> > > times are bad (~100msec) when ASPM is enabled, as reported by lspci.
> > >
> > > On Pavel's system, the FADT says we
Hi!
> [+cc Jeff, Jesse, et al, e1000-devel]
>
> Holy cow, you guys have a lot of folks listed in MAINTAINERS for Intel
> drivers :) This is an ASPM question, if that helps narrow down the
> folks interested.
> >> If ASPM is enabled for a
> >> device, e.g., your NIC, the link may be put in a
Hi!
[+cc Jeff, Jesse, et al, e1000-devel]
Holy cow, you guys have a lot of folks listed in MAINTAINERS for Intel
drivers :) This is an ASPM question, if that helps narrow down the
folks interested.
If ASPM is enabled for a
device, e.g., your NIC, the link may be put in a low power
Hi!
Pavel's ThinkPad X60 has two NICs: Intel 82573L and Intel PRO/Wireless
3945ABG. I'm pretty sure the problem he's reporting is with the 82573L.
Ping
times are bad (~100msec) when ASPM is enabled, as reported by lspci.
On Pavel's system, the FADT says we shouldn't enable
re, Donald C; Rose,
> Gregory
> V; Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P; Duyck, Alexander H; Ronciak, John; Dave, Tushar N;
> e1000-de...@lists.sourceforge.net; linux-...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: /sys/module/pcie_aspm/parameters/policy not writable?
>
> [+cc linux-pci]
>
> On Wed,
,
Gregory
V; Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P; Duyck, Alexander H; Ronciak, John; Dave, Tushar N;
e1000-de...@lists.sourceforge.net; linux-...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: /sys/module/pcie_aspm/parameters/policy not writable?
[+cc linux-pci]
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 10:21:32PM +, Wyborny, Carolyn wrote
[+cc linux-pci]
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 10:21:32PM +, Wyborny, Carolyn wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Bjorn Helgaas [mailto:bhelg...@google.com]
> [..]
>
> > Pavel's ThinkPad X60 has two NICs: Intel 82573L and Intel PRO/Wireless
> > 3945ABG. I'm pretty sure the problem he's
> -Original Message-
> From: Bjorn Helgaas [mailto:bhelg...@google.com]
[..]
> Holy cow, you guys have a lot of folks listed in MAINTAINERS for Intel
> drivers :)
> This is an ASPM question, if that helps narrow down the folks interested.
Well, we try to have everyone involved, I guess.
[+cc Jeff, Jesse, et al, e1000-devel]
Holy cow, you guys have a lot of folks listed in MAINTAINERS for Intel
drivers :) This is an ASPM question, if that helps narrow down the
folks interested.
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 7:29 AM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> >> But:
>> >> 1) it should not list
Hi!
> >> But:
> >> 1) it should not list unavailable options
> >>
> >> 2) operation not permitted seems like wrong error code for
> >> operation not supported.
> >
> > So I forcibly enabled ASPM, and now ping latencies are in normal
> > range... no matter how I set
> >
Hi!
But:
1) it should not list unavailable options
2) operation not permitted seems like wrong error code for
operation not supported.
So I forcibly enabled ASPM, and now ping latencies are in normal
range... no matter how I set
/sys/module/pcie_aspm/parameters/policy. Strange.
[+cc Jeff, Jesse, et al, e1000-devel]
Holy cow, you guys have a lot of folks listed in MAINTAINERS for Intel
drivers :) This is an ASPM question, if that helps narrow down the
folks interested.
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 7:29 AM, Pavel Machek pa...@ucw.cz wrote:
Hi!
But:
1) it should not
-Original Message-
From: Bjorn Helgaas [mailto:bhelg...@google.com]
[..]
Holy cow, you guys have a lot of folks listed in MAINTAINERS for Intel
drivers :)
This is an ASPM question, if that helps narrow down the folks interested.
Well, we try to have everyone involved, I guess. I
[+cc linux-pci]
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 10:21:32PM +, Wyborny, Carolyn wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Bjorn Helgaas [mailto:bhelg...@google.com]
[..]
Pavel's ThinkPad X60 has two NICs: Intel 82573L and Intel PRO/Wireless
3945ABG. I'm pretty sure the problem he's reporting
On 07/09/2013 03:49 AM, Pavel Machek wrote:
On Mon 2013-07-08 21:13:21, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 03:26:11AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
My thinkpad has rather high ping latencies... and perhaps it is due to
PCIE ASPM.
Why would that be the problem? The odds that the PCIE
Hi!
> > > > My thinkpad has rather high ping latencies... and perhaps it is due to
> > > > PCIE ASPM.
> > >
> > > Why would that be the problem? The odds that the PCIE bus is the issue
> > > seems strange to me.
> >
> > Aha: I guess that's why the file is not writable:
> >
> > pavel@amd:~$
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 11:49:06AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Mon 2013-07-08 21:13:21, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 03:26:11AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > My thinkpad has rather high ping latencies... and perhaps it is due to
> > > PCIE ASPM.
> >
> > Why
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 4:10 AM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>> > > My thinkpad has rather high ping latencies... and perhaps it is due to
>> > > PCIE ASPM.
>> >
>> > Why would that be the problem? The odds that the PCIE bus is the issue
>> > seems strange to me.
>>
>> Aha: I guess that's why the
Hi!
> > > My thinkpad has rather high ping latencies... and perhaps it is due to
> > > PCIE ASPM.
> >
> > Why would that be the problem? The odds that the PCIE bus is the issue
> > seems strange to me.
>
> Aha: I guess that's why the file is not writable:
>
> pavel@amd:~$ dmesg | grep -i aspm
On Mon 2013-07-08 21:13:21, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 03:26:11AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > My thinkpad has rather high ping latencies... and perhaps it is due to
> > PCIE ASPM.
>
> Why would that be the problem? The odds that the PCIE bus is the issue
> seems
Hi!
> > My thinkpad has rather high ping latencies... and perhaps it is due to
> > PCIE ASPM.
>
> Why would that be the problem? The odds that the PCIE bus is the issue
> seems strange to me.
Well, I google a bit. Apparently, the issue is common on x60/t60
machine and was never fixed properly.
On 07/09/2013 03:49 AM, Pavel Machek wrote:
On Mon 2013-07-08 21:13:21, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 03:26:11AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
My thinkpad has rather high ping latencies... and perhaps it is due to
PCIE ASPM.
Why would that be the problem? The odds that the PCIE
Hi!
My thinkpad has rather high ping latencies... and perhaps it is due to
PCIE ASPM.
Why would that be the problem? The odds that the PCIE bus is the issue
seems strange to me.
Well, I google a bit. Apparently, the issue is common on x60/t60
machine and was never fixed properly.
And
On Mon 2013-07-08 21:13:21, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 03:26:11AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
My thinkpad has rather high ping latencies... and perhaps it is due to
PCIE ASPM.
Why would that be the problem? The odds that the PCIE bus is the issue
seems strange to me.
Hi!
My thinkpad has rather high ping latencies... and perhaps it is due to
PCIE ASPM.
Why would that be the problem? The odds that the PCIE bus is the issue
seems strange to me.
Aha: I guess that's why the file is not writable:
pavel@amd:~$ dmesg | grep -i aspm
ACPI FADT
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 4:10 AM, Pavel Machek pa...@ucw.cz wrote:
Hi!
My thinkpad has rather high ping latencies... and perhaps it is due to
PCIE ASPM.
Why would that be the problem? The odds that the PCIE bus is the issue
seems strange to me.
Aha: I guess that's why the file is not
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 11:49:06AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
On Mon 2013-07-08 21:13:21, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 03:26:11AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
My thinkpad has rather high ping latencies... and perhaps it is due to
PCIE ASPM.
Why would that be the
Hi!
My thinkpad has rather high ping latencies... and perhaps it is due to
PCIE ASPM.
Why would that be the problem? The odds that the PCIE bus is the issue
seems strange to me.
Aha: I guess that's why the file is not writable:
pavel@amd:~$ dmesg | grep -i aspm
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 03:26:11AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> My thinkpad has rather high ping latencies... and perhaps it is due to
> PCIE ASPM.
Why would that be the problem? The odds that the PCIE bus is the issue
seems strange to me.
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list:
Hi!
My thinkpad has rather high ping latencies... and perhaps it is due to
PCIE ASPM.
Its help text says:
CONFIG_PCIEASPM:
This enables OS control over PCI Express ASPM (Active State
Power Management) and Clock Power Management. ASPM supports
state L0/L0s/L1.
...
ASPM can be disabled or
Hi!
My thinkpad has rather high ping latencies... and perhaps it is due to
PCIE ASPM.
Its help text says:
CONFIG_PCIEASPM:
This enables OS control over PCI Express ASPM (Active State
Power Management) and Clock Power Management. ASPM supports
state L0/L0s/L1.
...
ASPM can be disabled or
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 03:26:11AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
My thinkpad has rather high ping latencies... and perhaps it is due to
PCIE ASPM.
Why would that be the problem? The odds that the PCIE bus is the issue
seems strange to me.
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send
64 matches
Mail list logo
