This patch fixes a bug of jprobe and cleans up.
jprobe for x86-64 can cause kernel page fault when the jprobe_return()
is called from incorrect function. Anyway, that path finally invokes
BUG() macro, so this is not so serious.

- Use jprobe_saved_regs instead getting it from stack.
  (Especially on x86-64, it may get incorrect data, because
   pt_regs can not be get by using container_of(rsp))
- Change the type of stack pointer to unsigned long *.

Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Acked-by: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

---
 arch/x86/kernel/kprobes_32.c |    4 +---
 arch/x86/kernel/kprobes_64.c |    4 +---
 include/asm-x86/kprobes_32.h |    2 +-
 include/asm-x86/kprobes_64.h |    2 +-
 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

Index: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes_32.c
===================================================================
--- 2.6.24-rc4-mm1.orig/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes_32.c
+++ 2.6.24-rc4-mm1/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes_32.c
@@ -742,9 +742,7 @@ int __kprobes longjmp_break_handler(stru

        if ((addr > (u8 *) jprobe_return) && (addr < (u8 *) jprobe_return_end)) 
{
                if (&regs->sp != kcb->jprobe_saved_esp) {
-                       struct pt_regs *saved_regs =
-                           container_of(kcb->jprobe_saved_esp,
-                                           struct pt_regs, sp);
+                       struct pt_regs *saved_regs = &kcb->jprobe_saved_regs;
                        printk("current sp %p does not match saved sp %p\n",
                               &regs->sp, kcb->jprobe_saved_esp);
                        printk("Saved registers for jprobe %p\n", jp);
Index: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes_64.c
===================================================================
--- 2.6.24-rc4-mm1.orig/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes_64.c
+++ 2.6.24-rc4-mm1/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes_64.c
@@ -732,9 +732,7 @@ int __kprobes longjmp_break_handler(stru

        if ((addr > (u8 *) jprobe_return) && (addr < (u8 *) jprobe_return_end)) 
{
                if ((long *)regs->sp != kcb->jprobe_saved_rsp) {
-                       struct pt_regs *saved_regs =
-                           container_of(kcb->jprobe_saved_rsp,
-                                           struct pt_regs, sp);
+                       struct pt_regs *saved_regs = &kcb->jprobe_saved_regs;
                        printk("current sp %p does not match saved sp %p\n",
                               (long *)regs->sp, kcb->jprobe_saved_rsp);
                        printk("Saved registers for jprobe %p\n", jp);
Index: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1/include/asm-x86/kprobes_32.h
===================================================================
--- 2.6.24-rc4-mm1.orig/include/asm-x86/kprobes_32.h
+++ 2.6.24-rc4-mm1/include/asm-x86/kprobes_32.h
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ struct kprobe_ctlblk {
        unsigned long kprobe_status;
        unsigned long kprobe_old_eflags;
        unsigned long kprobe_saved_eflags;
-       long *jprobe_saved_esp;
+       unsigned long *jprobe_saved_esp;
        struct pt_regs jprobe_saved_regs;
        kprobe_opcode_t jprobes_stack[MAX_STACK_SIZE];
        struct prev_kprobe prev_kprobe;
Index: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1/include/asm-x86/kprobes_64.h
===================================================================
--- 2.6.24-rc4-mm1.orig/include/asm-x86/kprobes_64.h
+++ 2.6.24-rc4-mm1/include/asm-x86/kprobes_64.h
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ struct kprobe_ctlblk {
        unsigned long kprobe_status;
        unsigned long kprobe_old_rflags;
        unsigned long kprobe_saved_rflags;
-       long *jprobe_saved_rsp;
+       unsigned long *jprobe_saved_rsp;
        struct pt_regs jprobe_saved_regs;
        kprobe_opcode_t jprobes_stack[MAX_STACK_SIZE];
        struct prev_kprobe prev_kprobe;

-- 
Masami Hiramatsu

Software Engineer
Hitachi Computer Products (America) Inc.
Software Solutions Division

e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to