On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 11:26:09AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 02:02:31AM -0300, Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski wrote:
> > > Thanks, I've merged this with the "original" in the tree, so all should
> > > be good now.
> >
> > Thanks. I saw what seems another issue now on the patch
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 08:37:31AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 02:02:31AM -0300, Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski wrote:
> > Thanks. I saw what seems another issue now on the patch too, sorry for
> > not noticing earlier: this backport is lacking the
> >
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 02:02:31AM -0300, Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski wrote:
> Thanks. I saw what seems another issue now on the patch too, sorry for
> not noticing earlier: this backport is lacking the
> write_seqcount_{begin,end} on set_mems_allowed for the case with
> CONFIG_CPUSETS, like in the
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 02:02:31AM -0300, Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski wrote:
Thanks. I saw what seems another issue now on the patch too, sorry for
not noticing earlier: this backport is lacking the
write_seqcount_{begin,end} on set_mems_allowed for the case with
CONFIG_CPUSETS, like in the
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 08:37:31AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 02:02:31AM -0300, Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski wrote:
Thanks. I saw what seems another issue now on the patch too, sorry for
not noticing earlier: this backport is lacking the
write_seqcount_{begin,end}
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 11:26:09AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 02:02:31AM -0300, Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski wrote:
Thanks, I've merged this with the original in the tree, so all should
be good now.
Thanks. I saw what seems another issue now on the patch too, sorry
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 02:02:31AM -0300, Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski wrote:
> > Thanks, I've merged this with the "original" in the tree, so all should
> > be good now.
>
> Thanks. I saw what seems another issue now on the patch too, sorry for
> not noticing earlier: this backport is lacking the
>
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 02:02:31AM -0300, Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski wrote:
Thanks, I've merged this with the original in the tree, so all should
be good now.
Thanks. I saw what seems another issue now on the patch too, sorry for
not noticing earlier: this backport is lacking the
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 12:01:16PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 04:23:47PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > > > --- a/mm/slub.c
> > > > +++ b/mm/slub.c
> > > > @@ -1457,6 +1457,7 @@ static struct page *get_any_partial(stru
> > > > struct zone *zone;
> > > >
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 04:23:47PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > > --- a/mm/slub.c
> > > +++ b/mm/slub.c
> > > @@ -1457,6 +1457,7 @@ static struct page *get_any_partial(stru
> > > struct zone *zone;
> > > enum zone_type high_zoneidx = gfp_zone(flags);
> > > struct page *page;
> > > + unsigned
> > --- a/mm/slub.c
> > +++ b/mm/slub.c
> > @@ -1457,6 +1457,7 @@ static struct page *get_any_partial(stru
> > struct zone *zone;
> > enum zone_type high_zoneidx = gfp_zone(flags);
> > struct page *page;
> > + unsigned int cpuset_mems_cookie;
> >
> > /*
> > * The defrag
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 02:29:57PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> From: Greg KH
>
> 3.0-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>
> --
>
> From: Mel Gorman
>
> commit cc9a6c8776615f9c194ccf0b63a0aa5628235545 upstream.
>
> Stable note: Not
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 02:29:57PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
From: Greg KH gre...@linuxfoundation.org
3.0-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Mel Gorman mgor...@suse.de
commit cc9a6c8776615f9c194ccf0b63a0aa5628235545
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -1457,6 +1457,7 @@ static struct page *get_any_partial(stru
struct zone *zone;
enum zone_type high_zoneidx = gfp_zone(flags);
struct page *page;
+ unsigned int cpuset_mems_cookie;
/*
* The defrag ratio allows a
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 04:23:47PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -1457,6 +1457,7 @@ static struct page *get_any_partial(stru
struct zone *zone;
enum zone_type high_zoneidx = gfp_zone(flags);
struct page *page;
+ unsigned int
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 12:01:16PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 04:23:47PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -1457,6 +1457,7 @@ static struct page *get_any_partial(stru
struct zone *zone;
enum zone_type
From: Greg KH
3.0-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Mel Gorman
commit cc9a6c8776615f9c194ccf0b63a0aa5628235545 upstream.
Stable note: Not tracked in Bugzilla. [get|put]_mems_allowed() is extremely
expensive and severely
From: Greg KH gre...@linuxfoundation.org
3.0-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Mel Gorman mgor...@suse.de
commit cc9a6c8776615f9c194ccf0b63a0aa5628235545 upstream.
Stable note: Not tracked in Bugzilla. [get|put]_mems_allowed() is
18 matches
Mail list logo
