Re: [2/2] 2.6.22-rc4: known regressions v3
Hi all, I have been investigating the random invalid instruction occourances on sparc32 (sun4c) and identified that the problem was introduced pre-v2.6.22-rc1. v2.6.21 is OK. The first time I have observed the issue so far is after commit b46b8f19c9cd435ecac4d9d12b39d78c137ecd66: Increase slab redzone to 64bits. Prior to this commit there apears to be a problem with the memory management (depmod -a causes the system to run out of memory!) that may be masking the issue. As a result of this, I am going to try to find the 'last known good' commit after v2.6.21 to see if this helps narrow down the cause. Regards Mark Fortescue. On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, William Lee Irwin III wrote: On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 11:30:25AM +0100, Mark Fortescue wrote: They apear as soon as simpleinit starts up. Somtimes I get to a login prompt before seeing any. Other times, commands in the simpleinit rc script fail. They do apear to be random. If a command failes, you re-run the command and it is OK. Commands seen to fail are basic (depmod, rm cat ..). The test I did use the same binaries with both the OK and problem kernels so it is not a change to the application code, it is definatly a kernel issue. This sounds like it may be addressed by benh's ptep_set_access_flags() fixes. Those fixes are still in -mm, hopefully to hit mainline by 2.6.22. -- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [2/2] 2.6.22-rc4: known regressions v3
Hi all, I have been investigating the random invalid instruction occourances on sparc32 (sun4c) and identified that the problem was introduced pre-v2.6.22-rc1. v2.6.21 is OK. The first time I have observed the issue so far is after commit b46b8f19c9cd435ecac4d9d12b39d78c137ecd66: Increase slab redzone to 64bits. Prior to this commit there apears to be a problem with the memory management (depmod -a causes the system to run out of memory!) that may be masking the issue. As a result of this, I am going to try to find the 'last known good' commit after v2.6.21 to see if this helps narrow down the cause. Regards Mark Fortescue. On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, William Lee Irwin III wrote: On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 11:30:25AM +0100, Mark Fortescue wrote: They apear as soon as simpleinit starts up. Somtimes I get to a login prompt before seeing any. Other times, commands in the simpleinit rc script fail. They do apear to be random. If a command failes, you re-run the command and it is OK. Commands seen to fail are basic (depmod, rm cat ..). The test I did use the same binaries with both the OK and problem kernels so it is not a change to the application code, it is definatly a kernel issue. This sounds like it may be addressed by benh's ptep_set_access_flags() fixes. Those fixes are still in -mm, hopefully to hit mainline by 2.6.22. -- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [2/2] 2.6.22-rc4: known regressions v3
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > > Subject: hibernate(?) fails totally - regression > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/1/401 > Submitter : David Greaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Caused-By : Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > commit 9666f4009c22f6520ac3fb8a19c9e32ab973e828 > Status : problem is being debugged Ahh. This is fixed (fix by Tejun, confirmed by David), and the fix has been merged. It's commit bc90ba093a, in case anybody cares. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [2/2] 2.6.22-rc4: known regressions v3
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007, Michal Piotrowski wrote: Subject: hibernate(?) fails totally - regression References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/1/401 Submitter : David Greaves [EMAIL PROTECTED] Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] Caused-By : Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] commit 9666f4009c22f6520ac3fb8a19c9e32ab973e828 Status : problem is being debugged Ahh. This is fixed (fix by Tejun, confirmed by David), and the fix has been merged. It's commit bc90ba093a, in case anybody cares. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [2/2] 2.6.22-rc4: known regressions v3
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 21:57:56 +0200 Michal Piotrowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > Here is a list of some known regressions in 2.6.22-rc4. > > Feel free to add new regressions/remove fixed etc. > http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regressions > > > > Networking > > Subject: commit 9093bbb2d96d0184f037cea9b4e952a44ebe7c32 broke the > bonding driver > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/13/65 > Submitter : Dan Aloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Handled-By : Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Status : Unknown > > Patch available (to bonding). - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [2/2] 2.6.22-rc4: known regressions v3
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 03:57:25PM +0100, Mark Fortescue wrote: > Benh's ptep_set_access_flags() patch needs to be applied in order to get > anyware with sun4c for all kernels >= linux-2.6.15. If not applied, you > will be lucky to get sash running as your init and even that will have > very limitit capabilities before it locks up the processor (power up > reset required). > It has been applied to both the kernels I used for testing so this > problem is independent of the ptep_set_access_flags patch but that > does not mean that it is not a related issue. > I will try to get some testing done over the weekend to narrow down > when the random illegal instructions first occour. > If I start with 2.6.21 then if that is OK, then I should be able to narow > the issue down without too much trouble. If it is between 2.6.20 and > 2.6.21 then it will be a right pig as there are a large number of commits > that don't compile for sun4c between these two. What I am hoping is that > it occours in the 2.6.22-rc2 as per the x86_64. Sounds like I'll be digging through my hardware stockpiles this weekend to find a functional sun4c box. -- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [2/2] 2.6.22-rc4: known regressions v3
Benh's ptep_set_access_flags() patch needs to be applied in order to get anyware with sun4c for all kernels >= linux-2.6.15. If not applied, you will be lucky to get sash running as your init and even that will have very limitit capabilities before it locks up the processor (power up reset required). It has been applied to both the kernels I used for testing so this problem is independent of the ptep_set_access_flags patch but that does not mean that it is not a related issue. I will try to get some testing done over the weekend to narrow down when the random illegal instructions first occour. If I start with 2.6.21 then if that is OK, then I should be able to narow the issue down without too much trouble. If it is between 2.6.20 and 2.6.21 then it will be a right pig as there are a large number of commits that don't compile for sun4c between these two. What I am hoping is that it occours in the 2.6.22-rc2 as per the x86_64. I am going to have to put a 'reset' button onto my test system as power up resets are bad news on this old hardware and almost all kernel failures result in a processor lockup. I have even had to make BUG reports 'panic' as thoes that I have during kernel fault location had are terminal to a sun4c (they cause a processor lockup). Regards Mark Fortescue. On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, William Lee Irwin III wrote: On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 11:30:25AM +0100, Mark Fortescue wrote: They apear as soon as simpleinit starts up. Somtimes I get to a login prompt before seeing any. Other times, commands in the simpleinit rc script fail. They do apear to be random. If a command failes, you re-run the command and it is OK. Commands seen to fail are basic (depmod, rm cat ..). The test I did use the same binaries with both the OK and problem kernels so it is not a change to the application code, it is definatly a kernel issue. This sounds like it may be addressed by benh's ptep_set_access_flags() fixes. Those fixes are still in -mm, hopefully to hit mainline by 2.6.22. -- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [2/2] 2.6.22-rc4: known regressions v3
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 11:30:25AM +0100, Mark Fortescue wrote: > They apear as soon as simpleinit starts up. Somtimes I get to a login > prompt before seeing any. Other times, commands in the simpleinit rc > script fail. > They do apear to be random. If a command failes, you re-run the command > and it is OK. Commands seen to fail are basic (depmod, rm cat ..). > The test I did use the same binaries with both the OK and problem kernels > so it is not a change to the application code, it is definatly a kernel > issue. This sounds like it may be addressed by benh's ptep_set_access_flags() fixes. Those fixes are still in -mm, hopefully to hit mainline by 2.6.22. -- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [2/2] 2.6.22-rc4: known regressions v3
Hi All, They apear as soon as simpleinit starts up. Somtimes I get to a login prompt before seeing any. Other times, commands in the simpleinit rc script fail. They do apear to be random. If a command failes, you re-run the command and it is OK. Commands seen to fail are basic (depmod, rm cat ..). The test I did use the same binaries with both the OK and problem kernels so it is not a change to the application code, it is definatly a kernel issue. Regards Mark Fortescue. On Wed, 13 Jun 2007, William Lee Irwin III wrote: On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 11:25:20PM +0100, Mark Fortescue wrote: The random seg faults on x86_64 is interesting as I have been getting random illegal instruction faults on sparc (sun4c) with 2.6.22-rc3. I have not yet tried to track it down. All I know at present is that it is not a problem on 2.6.20.9. Very interesting. Any hints as to how to test or how long to wait before the illegal instructions happen? -- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [2/2] 2.6.22-rc4: known regressions v3
Hi All, They apear as soon as simpleinit starts up. Somtimes I get to a login prompt before seeing any. Other times, commands in the simpleinit rc script fail. They do apear to be random. If a command failes, you re-run the command and it is OK. Commands seen to fail are basic (depmod, rm cat ..). The test I did use the same binaries with both the OK and problem kernels so it is not a change to the application code, it is definatly a kernel issue. Regards Mark Fortescue. On Wed, 13 Jun 2007, William Lee Irwin III wrote: On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 11:25:20PM +0100, Mark Fortescue wrote: The random seg faults on x86_64 is interesting as I have been getting random illegal instruction faults on sparc (sun4c) with 2.6.22-rc3. I have not yet tried to track it down. All I know at present is that it is not a problem on 2.6.20.9. Very interesting. Any hints as to how to test or how long to wait before the illegal instructions happen? -- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [2/2] 2.6.22-rc4: known regressions v3
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 11:30:25AM +0100, Mark Fortescue wrote: They apear as soon as simpleinit starts up. Somtimes I get to a login prompt before seeing any. Other times, commands in the simpleinit rc script fail. They do apear to be random. If a command failes, you re-run the command and it is OK. Commands seen to fail are basic (depmod, rm cat ..). The test I did use the same binaries with both the OK and problem kernels so it is not a change to the application code, it is definatly a kernel issue. This sounds like it may be addressed by benh's ptep_set_access_flags() fixes. Those fixes are still in -mm, hopefully to hit mainline by 2.6.22. -- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [2/2] 2.6.22-rc4: known regressions v3
Benh's ptep_set_access_flags() patch needs to be applied in order to get anyware with sun4c for all kernels = linux-2.6.15. If not applied, you will be lucky to get sash running as your init and even that will have very limitit capabilities before it locks up the processor (power up reset required). It has been applied to both the kernels I used for testing so this problem is independent of the ptep_set_access_flags patch but that does not mean that it is not a related issue. I will try to get some testing done over the weekend to narrow down when the random illegal instructions first occour. If I start with 2.6.21 then if that is OK, then I should be able to narow the issue down without too much trouble. If it is between 2.6.20 and 2.6.21 then it will be a right pig as there are a large number of commits that don't compile for sun4c between these two. What I am hoping is that it occours in the 2.6.22-rc2 as per the x86_64. I am going to have to put a 'reset' button onto my test system as power up resets are bad news on this old hardware and almost all kernel failures result in a processor lockup. I have even had to make BUG reports 'panic' as thoes that I have during kernel fault location had are terminal to a sun4c (they cause a processor lockup). Regards Mark Fortescue. On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, William Lee Irwin III wrote: On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 11:30:25AM +0100, Mark Fortescue wrote: They apear as soon as simpleinit starts up. Somtimes I get to a login prompt before seeing any. Other times, commands in the simpleinit rc script fail. They do apear to be random. If a command failes, you re-run the command and it is OK. Commands seen to fail are basic (depmod, rm cat ..). The test I did use the same binaries with both the OK and problem kernels so it is not a change to the application code, it is definatly a kernel issue. This sounds like it may be addressed by benh's ptep_set_access_flags() fixes. Those fixes are still in -mm, hopefully to hit mainline by 2.6.22. -- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [2/2] 2.6.22-rc4: known regressions v3
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 03:57:25PM +0100, Mark Fortescue wrote: Benh's ptep_set_access_flags() patch needs to be applied in order to get anyware with sun4c for all kernels = linux-2.6.15. If not applied, you will be lucky to get sash running as your init and even that will have very limitit capabilities before it locks up the processor (power up reset required). It has been applied to both the kernels I used for testing so this problem is independent of the ptep_set_access_flags patch but that does not mean that it is not a related issue. I will try to get some testing done over the weekend to narrow down when the random illegal instructions first occour. If I start with 2.6.21 then if that is OK, then I should be able to narow the issue down without too much trouble. If it is between 2.6.20 and 2.6.21 then it will be a right pig as there are a large number of commits that don't compile for sun4c between these two. What I am hoping is that it occours in the 2.6.22-rc2 as per the x86_64. Sounds like I'll be digging through my hardware stockpiles this weekend to find a functional sun4c box. -- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [2/2] 2.6.22-rc4: known regressions v3
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 21:57:56 +0200 Michal Piotrowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, Here is a list of some known regressions in 2.6.22-rc4. Feel free to add new regressions/remove fixed etc. http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regressions Networking Subject: commit 9093bbb2d96d0184f037cea9b4e952a44ebe7c32 broke the bonding driver References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/13/65 Submitter : Dan Aloni [EMAIL PROTECTED] Handled-By : Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED] Status : Unknown Patch available (to bonding). - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [2/2] 2.6.22-rc4: known regressions v3
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 11:25:20PM +0100, Mark Fortescue wrote: > The random seg faults on x86_64 is interesting as I have been getting > random illegal instruction faults on sparc (sun4c) with 2.6.22-rc3. I have > not yet tried to track it down. All I know at present is that it is not a > problem on 2.6.20.9. Very interesting. Any hints as to how to test or how long to wait before the illegal instructions happen? -- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [2/2] 2.6.22-rc4: known regressions v3
Hi all, The random seg faults on x86_64 is interesting as I have been getting random illegal instruction faults on sparc (sun4c) with 2.6.22-rc3. I have not yet tried to track it down. All I know at present is that it is not a problem on 2.6.20.9. Regards Mark Fortescue. On Wed, 13 Jun 2007, Michal Piotrowski wrote: Hi all, Here is a list of some known regressions in 2.6.22-rc4. Feel free to add new regressions/remove fixed etc. http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regressions Networking Subject: commit 9093bbb2d96d0184f037cea9b4e952a44ebe7c32 broke the bonding driver References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/13/65 Submitter : Dan Aloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Handled-By : Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Status : Unknown Sparc64 Subject: 2.6.22-rc broke X on Ultra5 References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/22/78 Submitter : Mikael Pettersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Handled-By : David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Status : problem is being debugged Suspend Subject: hibernate(?) fails totally - regression References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/1/401 Submitter : David Greaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Caused-By : Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> commit 9666f4009c22f6520ac3fb8a19c9e32ab973e828 Status : problem is being debugged TTY Subject: OOPS (NULL pointer dereference) in v2.6.22-rc3 References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/1/389 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8473 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8574 Submitter : Alex Riesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Status : problem is being debugged x86-64 Subject: x86-64 2.6.22-rc2 random segfaults References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/24/275 Submitter : Ioan Ionita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Status : Unknown Regards, Michal -- LOG http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/log/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [2/2] 2.6.22-rc4: known regressions v3
On 13/06/07, Björn Steinbrink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 2007.06.13 21:57:56 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > TTY > > Subject: OOPS (NULL pointer dereference) in v2.6.22-rc3 > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/1/389 > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8473 > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8574 > Submitter : Alex Riesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Status : problem is being debugged Patch available at: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/8/490 Thanks for letting me know. Regards, Michal -- LOG http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/log/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [2/2] 2.6.22-rc4: known regressions v3
On 2007.06.13 21:57:56 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > TTY > > Subject: OOPS (NULL pointer dereference) in v2.6.22-rc3 > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/1/389 > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8473 > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8574 > Submitter : Alex Riesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Status : problem is being debugged Patch available at: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/8/490 Björn - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [2/2] 2.6.22-rc4: known regressions v3
Hi all, Here is a list of some known regressions in 2.6.22-rc4. Feel free to add new regressions/remove fixed etc. http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regressions Networking Subject: commit 9093bbb2d96d0184f037cea9b4e952a44ebe7c32 broke the bonding driver References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/13/65 Submitter : Dan Aloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Handled-By : Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Status : Unknown Sparc64 Subject: 2.6.22-rc broke X on Ultra5 References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/22/78 Submitter : Mikael Pettersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Handled-By : David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Status : problem is being debugged Suspend Subject: hibernate(?) fails totally - regression References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/1/401 Submitter : David Greaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Caused-By : Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> commit 9666f4009c22f6520ac3fb8a19c9e32ab973e828 Status : problem is being debugged TTY Subject: OOPS (NULL pointer dereference) in v2.6.22-rc3 References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/1/389 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8473 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8574 Submitter : Alex Riesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Status : problem is being debugged x86-64 Subject: x86-64 2.6.22-rc2 random segfaults References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/24/275 Submitter : Ioan Ionita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Status : Unknown Regards, Michal -- LOG http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/log/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [2/2] 2.6.22-rc4: known regressions v3
Hi all, Here is a list of some known regressions in 2.6.22-rc4. Feel free to add new regressions/remove fixed etc. http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regressions Networking Subject: commit 9093bbb2d96d0184f037cea9b4e952a44ebe7c32 broke the bonding driver References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/13/65 Submitter : Dan Aloni [EMAIL PROTECTED] Handled-By : Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED] Status : Unknown Sparc64 Subject: 2.6.22-rc broke X on Ultra5 References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/22/78 Submitter : Mikael Pettersson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Handled-By : David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] Status : problem is being debugged Suspend Subject: hibernate(?) fails totally - regression References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/1/401 Submitter : David Greaves [EMAIL PROTECTED] Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] Caused-By : Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] commit 9666f4009c22f6520ac3fb8a19c9e32ab973e828 Status : problem is being debugged TTY Subject: OOPS (NULL pointer dereference) in v2.6.22-rc3 References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/1/389 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8473 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8574 Submitter : Alex Riesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Status : problem is being debugged x86-64 Subject: x86-64 2.6.22-rc2 random segfaults References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/24/275 Submitter : Ioan Ionita [EMAIL PROTECTED] Status : Unknown Regards, Michal -- LOG http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/log/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [2/2] 2.6.22-rc4: known regressions v3
On 2007.06.13 21:57:56 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote: TTY Subject: OOPS (NULL pointer dereference) in v2.6.22-rc3 References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/1/389 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8473 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8574 Submitter : Alex Riesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Status : problem is being debugged Patch available at: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/8/490 Björn - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [2/2] 2.6.22-rc4: known regressions v3
On 13/06/07, Björn Steinbrink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2007.06.13 21:57:56 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote: TTY Subject: OOPS (NULL pointer dereference) in v2.6.22-rc3 References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/1/389 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8473 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8574 Submitter : Alex Riesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Status : problem is being debugged Patch available at: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/8/490 Thanks for letting me know. Regards, Michal -- LOG http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/log/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [2/2] 2.6.22-rc4: known regressions v3
Hi all, The random seg faults on x86_64 is interesting as I have been getting random illegal instruction faults on sparc (sun4c) with 2.6.22-rc3. I have not yet tried to track it down. All I know at present is that it is not a problem on 2.6.20.9. Regards Mark Fortescue. On Wed, 13 Jun 2007, Michal Piotrowski wrote: Hi all, Here is a list of some known regressions in 2.6.22-rc4. Feel free to add new regressions/remove fixed etc. http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regressions Networking Subject: commit 9093bbb2d96d0184f037cea9b4e952a44ebe7c32 broke the bonding driver References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/13/65 Submitter : Dan Aloni [EMAIL PROTECTED] Handled-By : Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED] Status : Unknown Sparc64 Subject: 2.6.22-rc broke X on Ultra5 References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/22/78 Submitter : Mikael Pettersson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Handled-By : David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] Status : problem is being debugged Suspend Subject: hibernate(?) fails totally - regression References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/1/401 Submitter : David Greaves [EMAIL PROTECTED] Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] Caused-By : Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] commit 9666f4009c22f6520ac3fb8a19c9e32ab973e828 Status : problem is being debugged TTY Subject: OOPS (NULL pointer dereference) in v2.6.22-rc3 References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/1/389 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8473 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8574 Submitter : Alex Riesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Status : problem is being debugged x86-64 Subject: x86-64 2.6.22-rc2 random segfaults References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/24/275 Submitter : Ioan Ionita [EMAIL PROTECTED] Status : Unknown Regards, Michal -- LOG http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/log/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe sparclinux in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [2/2] 2.6.22-rc4: known regressions v3
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 11:25:20PM +0100, Mark Fortescue wrote: The random seg faults on x86_64 is interesting as I have been getting random illegal instruction faults on sparc (sun4c) with 2.6.22-rc3. I have not yet tried to track it down. All I know at present is that it is not a problem on 2.6.20.9. Very interesting. Any hints as to how to test or how long to wait before the illegal instructions happen? -- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
