Re: [2.6.12.3] dyntick 050610-1 breaks makes S3 suspend
On Monday 25 July 2005 12:27, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Christian Hesse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050723 05:51]: > > On Saturday 23 July 2005 14:35, Jan De Luyck wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > I recently tried out dyntick 050610-1 against 2.6.12.3, works great, it > > > actually makes a noticeable difference on my laptop's battery life. I > > > don't have hard numbers, lets just say that instead of the usual ~3 > > > hours i get out of it, i was ~4 before it started nagging, usual use > > > pattern at work. > > > > > > The only gripe I have with it that it stops S3 from working. If the > > > patch is compiled in the kernel, it makes S3 suspend correctly, but > > > resuming goes into a solid hang (nothing get's it back alive, have to > > > keep the powerbutton for ~5 secs to shutdown the system) > > > > > > Anything I could test? The logs don't give anything useful.. > > > > I reported this some time ago [1], but there's no sulution so far... > > > > [1] http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=4b4NI-7mJ-9%40gated-at.bofh.it > > In theory it should not happen... And it's working on my laptop for resume > just fine with dyntick on. Can you try it without APIC support? Maybe > that's the differerence again. (I don't have APIC on my laptop) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# zcat /proc/config.gz | grep APIC CONFIG_X86_GOOD_APIC=y # CONFIG_X86_UP_APIC is not set Only the second one can be changed in make (menu)config. So I think this is what you have? > Also a workaround is to disable dyntick before suspend with: > > # echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/timer/timer0/dyn_tick_state > > and then enable it again after resume. IIRC, this didn't work, system hangs at resume as well. Will try again if you've released an updated version. -- Christian pgpeNQS7NjPD8.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [2.6.12.3] dyntick 050610-1 breaks makes S3 suspend
* Christian Hesse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050723 05:51]: > On Saturday 23 July 2005 14:35, Jan De Luyck wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I recently tried out dyntick 050610-1 against 2.6.12.3, works great, it > > actually makes a noticeable difference on my laptop's battery life. I don't > > have hard numbers, lets just say that instead of the usual ~3 hours i get > > out of it, i was ~4 before it started nagging, usual use pattern at work. > > > > The only gripe I have with it that it stops S3 from working. If the patch > > is compiled in the kernel, it makes S3 suspend correctly, but resuming goes > > into a solid hang (nothing get's it back alive, have to keep the > > powerbutton for ~5 secs to shutdown the system) > > > > Anything I could test? The logs don't give anything useful.. > > I reported this some time ago [1], but there's no sulution so far... > > [1] http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=4b4NI-7mJ-9%40gated-at.bofh.it In theory it should not happen... And it's working on my laptop for resume just fine with dyntick on. Can you try it without APIC support? Maybe that's the differerence again. (I don't have APIC on my laptop) Also a workaround is to disable dyntick before suspend with: # echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/timer/timer0/dyn_tick_state and then enable it again after resume. Tony - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [2.6.12.3] dyntick 050610-1 breaks makes S3 suspend
* Christian Hesse [EMAIL PROTECTED] [050723 05:51]: On Saturday 23 July 2005 14:35, Jan De Luyck wrote: Hello, I recently tried out dyntick 050610-1 against 2.6.12.3, works great, it actually makes a noticeable difference on my laptop's battery life. I don't have hard numbers, lets just say that instead of the usual ~3 hours i get out of it, i was ~4 before it started nagging, usual use pattern at work. The only gripe I have with it that it stops S3 from working. If the patch is compiled in the kernel, it makes S3 suspend correctly, but resuming goes into a solid hang (nothing get's it back alive, have to keep the powerbutton for ~5 secs to shutdown the system) Anything I could test? The logs don't give anything useful.. I reported this some time ago [1], but there's no sulution so far... [1] http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=4b4NI-7mJ-9%40gated-at.bofh.it In theory it should not happen... And it's working on my laptop for resume just fine with dyntick on. Can you try it without APIC support? Maybe that's the differerence again. (I don't have APIC on my laptop) Also a workaround is to disable dyntick before suspend with: # echo 0 /sys/devices/system/timer/timer0/dyn_tick_state and then enable it again after resume. Tony - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [2.6.12.3] dyntick 050610-1 breaks makes S3 suspend
On Monday 25 July 2005 12:27, Tony Lindgren wrote: * Christian Hesse [EMAIL PROTECTED] [050723 05:51]: On Saturday 23 July 2005 14:35, Jan De Luyck wrote: Hello, I recently tried out dyntick 050610-1 against 2.6.12.3, works great, it actually makes a noticeable difference on my laptop's battery life. I don't have hard numbers, lets just say that instead of the usual ~3 hours i get out of it, i was ~4 before it started nagging, usual use pattern at work. The only gripe I have with it that it stops S3 from working. If the patch is compiled in the kernel, it makes S3 suspend correctly, but resuming goes into a solid hang (nothing get's it back alive, have to keep the powerbutton for ~5 secs to shutdown the system) Anything I could test? The logs don't give anything useful.. I reported this some time ago [1], but there's no sulution so far... [1] http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=4b4NI-7mJ-9%40gated-at.bofh.it In theory it should not happen... And it's working on my laptop for resume just fine with dyntick on. Can you try it without APIC support? Maybe that's the differerence again. (I don't have APIC on my laptop) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# zcat /proc/config.gz | grep APIC CONFIG_X86_GOOD_APIC=y # CONFIG_X86_UP_APIC is not set Only the second one can be changed in make (menu)config. So I think this is what you have? Also a workaround is to disable dyntick before suspend with: # echo 0 /sys/devices/system/timer/timer0/dyn_tick_state and then enable it again after resume. IIRC, this didn't work, system hangs at resume as well. Will try again if you've released an updated version. -- Christian pgpeNQS7NjPD8.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [2.6.12.3] dyntick 050610-1 breaks makes S3 suspend
On Sunday 24 July 2005 16:23, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > > I recently tried out dyntick 050610-1 against 2.6.12.3, works great, it > > > actually makes a noticeable difference on my laptop's battery life. I > > > don't have hard numbers, lets just say that instead of the usual ~3 > > > hours i get out of it, i was ~4 before it started nagging, usual use > > > pattern at work. > > > > > > The only gripe I have with it that it stops S3 from working. If the > > > patch is compiled in the kernel, it makes S3 suspend correctly, but > > > resuming goes into a solid hang (nothing get's it back alive, have to > > > keep the powerbutton for ~5 secs to shutdown the system) > > > > > > Anything I could test? The logs don't give anything useful.. > > > > I reported this some time ago [1], but there's no sulution so far... > > > > [1] http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=4b4NI-7mJ-9%40gated-at.bofh.it > > Does it also break if swsusp? Does it break if you replace enter sleep > function with some kind of dummy functions? (Or perhaps S1 is enough > for this test?) I have only tried with S3.. how do I test with S1? Jan -- YOW!! I'm in a very clever and adorable INSANE ASYLUM!! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [2.6.12.3] dyntick 050610-1 breaks makes S3 suspend
Hi! > > I recently tried out dyntick 050610-1 against 2.6.12.3, works great, it > > actually makes a noticeable difference on my laptop's battery life. I don't > > have hard numbers, lets just say that instead of the usual ~3 hours i get > > out of it, i was ~4 before it started nagging, usual use pattern at work. > > > > The only gripe I have with it that it stops S3 from working. If the patch > > is compiled in the kernel, it makes S3 suspend correctly, but resuming goes > > into a solid hang (nothing get's it back alive, have to keep the > > powerbutton for ~5 secs to shutdown the system) > > > > Anything I could test? The logs don't give anything useful.. > > I reported this some time ago [1], but there's no sulution so far... > > [1] http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=4b4NI-7mJ-9%40gated-at.bofh.it Does it also break if swsusp? Does it break if you replace enter sleep function with some kind of dummy functions? (Or perhaps S1 is enough for this test?) Pavel -- teflon -- maybe it is a trademark, but it should not be. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [2.6.12.3] dyntick 050610-1 breaks makes S3 suspend
Hi! I recently tried out dyntick 050610-1 against 2.6.12.3, works great, it actually makes a noticeable difference on my laptop's battery life. I don't have hard numbers, lets just say that instead of the usual ~3 hours i get out of it, i was ~4 before it started nagging, usual use pattern at work. The only gripe I have with it that it stops S3 from working. If the patch is compiled in the kernel, it makes S3 suspend correctly, but resuming goes into a solid hang (nothing get's it back alive, have to keep the powerbutton for ~5 secs to shutdown the system) Anything I could test? The logs don't give anything useful.. I reported this some time ago [1], but there's no sulution so far... [1] http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=4b4NI-7mJ-9%40gated-at.bofh.it Does it also break if swsusp? Does it break if you replace enter sleep function with some kind of dummy functions? (Or perhaps S1 is enough for this test?) Pavel -- teflon -- maybe it is a trademark, but it should not be. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [2.6.12.3] dyntick 050610-1 breaks makes S3 suspend
On Sunday 24 July 2005 16:23, Pavel Machek wrote: Hi! I recently tried out dyntick 050610-1 against 2.6.12.3, works great, it actually makes a noticeable difference on my laptop's battery life. I don't have hard numbers, lets just say that instead of the usual ~3 hours i get out of it, i was ~4 before it started nagging, usual use pattern at work. The only gripe I have with it that it stops S3 from working. If the patch is compiled in the kernel, it makes S3 suspend correctly, but resuming goes into a solid hang (nothing get's it back alive, have to keep the powerbutton for ~5 secs to shutdown the system) Anything I could test? The logs don't give anything useful.. I reported this some time ago [1], but there's no sulution so far... [1] http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=4b4NI-7mJ-9%40gated-at.bofh.it Does it also break if swsusp? Does it break if you replace enter sleep function with some kind of dummy functions? (Or perhaps S1 is enough for this test?) I have only tried with S3.. how do I test with S1? Jan -- YOW!! I'm in a very clever and adorable INSANE ASYLUM!! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [2.6.12.3] dyntick 050610-1 breaks makes S3 suspend
On Saturday 23 July 2005 14:35, Jan De Luyck wrote: > Hello, > > I recently tried out dyntick 050610-1 against 2.6.12.3, works great, it > actually makes a noticeable difference on my laptop's battery life. I don't > have hard numbers, lets just say that instead of the usual ~3 hours i get > out of it, i was ~4 before it started nagging, usual use pattern at work. > > The only gripe I have with it that it stops S3 from working. If the patch > is compiled in the kernel, it makes S3 suspend correctly, but resuming goes > into a solid hang (nothing get's it back alive, have to keep the > powerbutton for ~5 secs to shutdown the system) > > Anything I could test? The logs don't give anything useful.. I reported this some time ago [1], but there's no sulution so far... [1] http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=4b4NI-7mJ-9%40gated-at.bofh.it -- Christian pgpyBhP39QXNl.pgp Description: PGP signature
[2.6.12.3] dyntick 050610-1 breaks makes S3 suspend
Hello, I recently tried out dyntick 050610-1 against 2.6.12.3, works great, it actually makes a noticeable difference on my laptop's battery life. I don't have hard numbers, lets just say that instead of the usual ~3 hours i get out of it, i was ~4 before it started nagging, usual use pattern at work. The only gripe I have with it that it stops S3 from working. If the patch is compiled in the kernel, it makes S3 suspend correctly, but resuming goes into a solid hang (nothing get's it back alive, have to keep the powerbutton for ~5 secs to shutdown the system) Anything I could test? The logs don't give anything useful.. Thanks, Jan -- Yow! I'm having a quadrophonic sensation of two winos alone in a steel mill! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [2.6.12.3] dyntick 050610-1 breaks makes S3 suspend
On Saturday 23 July 2005 14:35, Jan De Luyck wrote: Hello, I recently tried out dyntick 050610-1 against 2.6.12.3, works great, it actually makes a noticeable difference on my laptop's battery life. I don't have hard numbers, lets just say that instead of the usual ~3 hours i get out of it, i was ~4 before it started nagging, usual use pattern at work. The only gripe I have with it that it stops S3 from working. If the patch is compiled in the kernel, it makes S3 suspend correctly, but resuming goes into a solid hang (nothing get's it back alive, have to keep the powerbutton for ~5 secs to shutdown the system) Anything I could test? The logs don't give anything useful.. I reported this some time ago [1], but there's no sulution so far... [1] http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=4b4NI-7mJ-9%40gated-at.bofh.it -- Christian pgpyBhP39QXNl.pgp Description: PGP signature
