Re: [2.6.21.1] SATA freeze

2007-06-04 Thread Tomasz Chmielewski
Fred Moyer wrote: Sounds like SMART is likely disabled on that drive. You can try doing "smartctl -s on /dev/sda" and see if that will turn it on. Sorry - that last post of mine was brain dead. Here's the one with (hopefully) useful data. app2 ~ # smartctl -d ata -a /dev/sda smartctl

Re: [2.6.21.1] SATA freeze

2007-06-04 Thread Tomasz Chmielewski
Fred Moyer wrote: Sounds like SMART is likely disabled on that drive. You can try doing smartctl -s on /dev/sda and see if that will turn it on. Sorry - that last post of mine was brain dead. Here's the one with (hopefully) useful data. app2 ~ # smartctl -d ata -a /dev/sda smartctl

Re: [2.6.21.1] SATA freeze

2007-05-13 Thread Jim Paris
> > This appears to be a different problem. Something is issuing SMART-related > > commands (smartd or smartctl perhaps) which the drive seems to be reacting > > strangely to. .. > Specifically, I could trigger it by running 'smartctl -d ata -S on > /dev/sda' OR (s-S/o/). This sounds like a

Re: [2.6.21.1] SATA freeze

2007-05-13 Thread Jim Paris
This appears to be a different problem. Something is issuing SMART-related commands (smartd or smartctl perhaps) which the drive seems to be reacting strangely to. .. Specifically, I could trigger it by running 'smartctl -d ata -S on /dev/sda' OR (s-S/o/). This sounds like a known

Re: [2.6.21.1] SATA freeze

2007-05-12 Thread Fred Moyer
Robert Hancock wrote: Fred Moyer wrote: This appears to be a different problem. Something is issuing SMART-related commands (smartd or smartctl perhaps) which the drive seems to be reacting strangely to. It apparently completed the command but never raised DRQ to request any data being

Re: [2.6.21.1] SATA freeze

2007-05-12 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 12:48:59PM -0600, Robert Hancock wrote: > Fred Moyer wrote: > > I just joined the list today so apologies if this email breaks any email > > client post threading. > > I have been seeing similar errors on two different systems. I applied > > Robert's sata_nv patch

Re: [2.6.21.1] SATA freeze

2007-05-12 Thread Robert Hancock
Fred Moyer wrote: This appears to be a different problem. Something is issuing SMART-related commands (smartd or smartctl perhaps) which the drive seems to be reacting strangely to. It apparently completed the command but never raised DRQ to request any data being transferred even though we

Re: [2.6.21.1] SATA freeze

2007-05-12 Thread Fred Moyer
Robert Hancock wrote: Fred Moyer wrote: I just joined the list today so apologies if this email breaks any email client post threading. I have been seeing similar errors on two different systems. I applied Robert's sata_nv patch posted to the list on May 5th, and approved today by Jeff

Re: [2.6.21.1] SATA freeze

2007-05-12 Thread Robert Hancock
Fred Moyer wrote: I just joined the list today so apologies if this email breaks any email client post threading. I have been seeing similar errors on two different systems. I applied Robert's sata_nv patch posted to the list on May 5th, and approved today by Jeff Garzik. I've taken

Re: [2.6.21.1] SATA freeze

2007-05-12 Thread Robert Hancock
Gerhard Mack wrote: On Wed, 9 May 2007, Robert Hancock wrote: Gerhard Mack wrote: On Wed, 9 May 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote: Gerhard Mack wrote: May 9 14:51:35 mgerhard kernel: ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x180 action 0x2 frozen May 9 14:51:35 mgerhard kernel: ata1.00: cmd

Re: [2.6.21.1] SATA freeze

2007-05-12 Thread Robert Hancock
Gerhard Mack wrote: On Wed, 9 May 2007, Robert Hancock wrote: Gerhard Mack wrote: On Wed, 9 May 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote: Gerhard Mack wrote: May 9 14:51:35 mgerhard kernel: ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x180 action 0x2 frozen May 9 14:51:35 mgerhard kernel: ata1.00: cmd

Re: [2.6.21.1] SATA freeze

2007-05-12 Thread Robert Hancock
Fred Moyer wrote: I just joined the list today so apologies if this email breaks any email client post threading. I have been seeing similar errors on two different systems. I applied Robert's sata_nv patch posted to the list on May 5th, and approved today by Jeff Garzik. I've taken

Re: [2.6.21.1] SATA freeze

2007-05-12 Thread Fred Moyer
Robert Hancock wrote: Fred Moyer wrote: I just joined the list today so apologies if this email breaks any email client post threading. I have been seeing similar errors on two different systems. I applied Robert's sata_nv patch posted to the list on May 5th, and approved today by Jeff

Re: [2.6.21.1] SATA freeze

2007-05-12 Thread Robert Hancock
Fred Moyer wrote: This appears to be a different problem. Something is issuing SMART-related commands (smartd or smartctl perhaps) which the drive seems to be reacting strangely to. It apparently completed the command but never raised DRQ to request any data being transferred even though we

Re: [2.6.21.1] SATA freeze

2007-05-12 Thread Fred Moyer
Robert Hancock wrote: Fred Moyer wrote: This appears to be a different problem. Something is issuing SMART-related commands (smartd or smartctl perhaps) which the drive seems to be reacting strangely to. It apparently completed the command but never raised DRQ to request any data being

Re: Re: [2.6.21.1] SATA freeze

2007-05-10 Thread Fred Moyer
Robert Hancock wrote: >Gerhard Mack wrote: >> On Wed, 9 May 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote: >>> Gerhard Mack wrote: May 9 14:51:35 mgerhard kernel: ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x180 action 0x2 frozen May 9 14:51:35 mgerhard kernel: ata1.00: cmd

Re: [2.6.21.1] SATA freeze

2007-05-10 Thread Gerhard Mack
On Wed, 9 May 2007, Robert Hancock wrote: > Gerhard Mack wrote: > > On Wed, 9 May 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > > Gerhard Mack wrote: > > > > May 9 14:51:35 mgerhard kernel: ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 > > > > SErr > > > > 0x180 action 0x2 frozen > > > > May 9 14:51:35 mgerhard

Re: [2.6.21.1] SATA freeze

2007-05-10 Thread Gerhard Mack
On Thu, 10 May 2007, Mikael Pettersson wrote: > Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 10:51:57 +0200 > From: Mikael Pettersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Gerhard Mack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: [2.6.21

Re: [2.6.21.1] SATA freeze

2007-05-10 Thread Mikael Pettersson
Gerhard Mack writes: > On Wed, 9 May 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > Gerhard Mack wrote: > > > May 9 14:51:35 mgerhard kernel: ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 > > > SErr > > > 0x180 action 0x2 frozen > > > May 9 14:51:35 mgerhard kernel: ata1.00: cmd > > >

Re: [2.6.21.1] SATA freeze

2007-05-10 Thread Mikael Pettersson
Gerhard Mack writes: On Wed, 9 May 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote: Gerhard Mack wrote: May 9 14:51:35 mgerhard kernel: ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x180 action 0x2 frozen May 9 14:51:35 mgerhard kernel: ata1.00: cmd 35/00:00:80:6d:c8/00:04:09:00:00/e0 tag 0

Re: [2.6.21.1] SATA freeze

2007-05-10 Thread Gerhard Mack
On Thu, 10 May 2007, Mikael Pettersson wrote: Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 10:51:57 +0200 From: Mikael Pettersson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Gerhard Mack [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED], linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [2.6.21.1] SATA freeze Gerhard Mack writes

Re: [2.6.21.1] SATA freeze

2007-05-10 Thread Gerhard Mack
On Wed, 9 May 2007, Robert Hancock wrote: Gerhard Mack wrote: On Wed, 9 May 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote: Gerhard Mack wrote: May 9 14:51:35 mgerhard kernel: ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x180 action 0x2 frozen May 9 14:51:35 mgerhard kernel: ata1.00: cmd

Re: Re: [2.6.21.1] SATA freeze

2007-05-10 Thread Fred Moyer
Robert Hancock wrote: Gerhard Mack wrote: On Wed, 9 May 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote: Gerhard Mack wrote: May 9 14:51:35 mgerhard kernel: ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x180 action 0x2 frozen May 9 14:51:35 mgerhard kernel: ata1.00: cmd 35/00:00:80:6d:c8/00:04:09:00:00/e0

Re: [2.6.21.1] SATA freeze

2007-05-09 Thread Robert Hancock
Gerhard Mack wrote: On Wed, 9 May 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote: Gerhard Mack wrote: May 9 14:51:35 mgerhard kernel: ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x180 action 0x2 frozen May 9 14:51:35 mgerhard kernel: ata1.00: cmd 35/00:00:80:6d:c8/00:04:09:00:00/e0 tag 0 cdb 0x0 data 524288 out

Re: [2.6.21.1] SATA freeze

2007-05-09 Thread Chuck Ebbert
Gerhard Mack wrote: > On Wed, 9 May 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote: >> Gerhard Mack wrote: >>> May 9 14:51:35 mgerhard kernel: ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr >>> 0x180 action 0x2 frozen >>> May 9 14:51:35 mgerhard kernel: ata1.00: cmd >>> 35/00:00:80:6d:c8/00:04:09:00:00/e0 tag 0 cdb

Re: [2.6.21.1] SATA freeze

2007-05-09 Thread Jeff Garzik
Gerhard Mack wrote: May 9 14:51:35 mgerhard kernel: ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x180 action 0x2 frozen May 9 14:51:35 mgerhard kernel: ata1.00: cmd 35/00:00:80:6d:c8/00:04:09:00:00/e0 tag 0 cdb 0x0 data 524288 out May 9 14:51:35 mgerhard kernel: res

[2.6.21.1] SATA freeze

2007-05-09 Thread Gerhard Mack
May 9 14:51:35 mgerhard kernel: ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x180 action 0x2 frozen May 9 14:51:35 mgerhard kernel: ata1.00: cmd 35/00:00:80:6d:c8/00:04:09:00:00/e0 tag 0 cdb 0x0 data 524288 out May 9 14:51:35 mgerhard kernel: res

[2.6.21.1] SATA freeze

2007-05-09 Thread Gerhard Mack
May 9 14:51:35 mgerhard kernel: ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x180 action 0x2 frozen May 9 14:51:35 mgerhard kernel: ata1.00: cmd 35/00:00:80:6d:c8/00:04:09:00:00/e0 tag 0 cdb 0x0 data 524288 out May 9 14:51:35 mgerhard kernel: res

Re: [2.6.21.1] SATA freeze

2007-05-09 Thread Jeff Garzik
Gerhard Mack wrote: May 9 14:51:35 mgerhard kernel: ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x180 action 0x2 frozen May 9 14:51:35 mgerhard kernel: ata1.00: cmd 35/00:00:80:6d:c8/00:04:09:00:00/e0 tag 0 cdb 0x0 data 524288 out May 9 14:51:35 mgerhard kernel: res

Re: [2.6.21.1] SATA freeze

2007-05-09 Thread Chuck Ebbert
Gerhard Mack wrote: On Wed, 9 May 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote: Gerhard Mack wrote: May 9 14:51:35 mgerhard kernel: ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x180 action 0x2 frozen May 9 14:51:35 mgerhard kernel: ata1.00: cmd 35/00:00:80:6d:c8/00:04:09:00:00/e0 tag 0 cdb 0x0 data 524288

Re: [2.6.21.1] SATA freeze

2007-05-09 Thread Robert Hancock
Gerhard Mack wrote: On Wed, 9 May 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote: Gerhard Mack wrote: May 9 14:51:35 mgerhard kernel: ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x180 action 0x2 frozen May 9 14:51:35 mgerhard kernel: ata1.00: cmd 35/00:00:80:6d:c8/00:04:09:00:00/e0 tag 0 cdb 0x0 data 524288 out