Re: [2.6.22 patch] the scheduled removal of OBSOLETE_OSS options

2007-03-07 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi Adrian ! On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 08:56:02PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: (...) > > Real problem is that we can expect several "sound does not work anymore" > > because people doing "make oldconfig" will get no warning at all about > > the removed options. Remember people complaining about

Re: [2.6.22 patch] the scheduled removal of OBSOLETE_OSS options

2007-03-07 Thread Lee Revell
On 3/7/07, Willy Tarreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Real problem is that we can expect several "sound does not work anymore" because people doing "make oldconfig" will get no warning at all about the removed options. Remember people complaining about keyboard not working ? Perhaps the real

Re: [2.6.22 patch] the scheduled removal of OBSOLETE_OSS options

2007-03-07 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 07:21:57AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: > On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 06:55:04PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 12:46:22PM -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote: > > > Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > >This patch contains the scheduled removal of the OBSOLETE_OSS options >

Re: [2.6.22 patch] the scheduled removal of OBSOLETE_OSS options

2007-03-07 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 07:21:57AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 06:55:04PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 12:46:22PM -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote: Adrian Bunk wrote: This patch contains the scheduled removal of the OBSOLETE_OSS options for

Re: [2.6.22 patch] the scheduled removal of OBSOLETE_OSS options

2007-03-07 Thread Lee Revell
On 3/7/07, Willy Tarreau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Real problem is that we can expect several sound does not work anymore because people doing make oldconfig will get no warning at all about the removed options. Remember people complaining about keyboard not working ? Perhaps the real problem is

Re: [2.6.22 patch] the scheduled removal of OBSOLETE_OSS options

2007-03-07 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi Adrian ! On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 08:56:02PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: (...) Real problem is that we can expect several sound does not work anymore because people doing make oldconfig will get no warning at all about the removed options. Remember people complaining about keyboard not

Re: [2.6.22 patch] the scheduled removal of OBSOLETE_OSS options

2007-03-06 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 06:55:04PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 12:46:22PM -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote: > > Adrian Bunk wrote: > > >This patch contains the scheduled removal of the OBSOLETE_OSS options > > >for 2.6.22. > > > > > If these are drivers for which there are

Re: [2.6.22 patch] the scheduled removal of OBSOLETE_OSS options

2007-03-06 Thread Bill Davidsen
Adrian Bunk wrote: On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 12:46:22PM -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote: Adrian Bunk wrote: This patch contains the scheduled removal of the OBSOLETE_OSS options for 2.6.22. If these are drivers for which there are thought to be useful ALSA drivers, would it be

Re: [2.6.22 patch] the scheduled removal of OBSOLETE_OSS options

2007-03-06 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 12:46:22PM -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote: > Adrian Bunk wrote: > >This patch contains the scheduled removal of the OBSOLETE_OSS options > >for 2.6.22. > > > If these are drivers for which there are thought to be useful ALSA > drivers, would it be reasonable to leave a stub

Re: [2.6.22 patch] the scheduled removal of OBSOLETE_OSS options

2007-03-06 Thread Bill Davidsen
Adrian Bunk wrote: This patch contains the scheduled removal of the OBSOLETE_OSS options for 2.6.22. If these are drivers for which there are thought to be useful ALSA drivers, would it be reasonable to leave a stub for a help file naming the driver which claims to support the hardware?

Re: [2.6.22 patch] the scheduled removal of OBSOLETE_OSS options

2007-03-06 Thread Bill Davidsen
Adrian Bunk wrote: This patch contains the scheduled removal of the OBSOLETE_OSS options for 2.6.22. If these are drivers for which there are thought to be useful ALSA drivers, would it be reasonable to leave a stub for a help file naming the driver which claims to support the hardware?

Re: [2.6.22 patch] the scheduled removal of OBSOLETE_OSS options

2007-03-06 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 12:46:22PM -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote: Adrian Bunk wrote: This patch contains the scheduled removal of the OBSOLETE_OSS options for 2.6.22. If these are drivers for which there are thought to be useful ALSA drivers, would it be reasonable to leave a stub for a help

Re: [2.6.22 patch] the scheduled removal of OBSOLETE_OSS options

2007-03-06 Thread Bill Davidsen
Adrian Bunk wrote: On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 12:46:22PM -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote: Adrian Bunk wrote: This patch contains the scheduled removal of the OBSOLETE_OSS options for 2.6.22. If these are drivers for which there are thought to be useful ALSA drivers, would it be

Re: [2.6.22 patch] the scheduled removal of OBSOLETE_OSS options

2007-03-06 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 06:55:04PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 12:46:22PM -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote: Adrian Bunk wrote: This patch contains the scheduled removal of the OBSOLETE_OSS options for 2.6.22. If these are drivers for which there are thought to be

[2.6.22 patch] the scheduled removal of OBSOLETE_OSS options

2007-03-04 Thread Adrian Bunk
This patch contains the scheduled removal of the OBSOLETE_OSS options for 2.6.22. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- sound/oss/Kconfig | 27 --- sound/oss/dmasound/Kconfig | 14 -- 2 files changed, 41 deletions(-) ---

[2.6.22 patch] the scheduled removal of OBSOLETE_OSS options

2007-03-04 Thread Adrian Bunk
This patch contains the scheduled removal of the OBSOLETE_OSS options for 2.6.22. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- sound/oss/Kconfig | 27 --- sound/oss/dmasound/Kconfig | 14 -- 2 files changed, 41 deletions(-) ---