[46/50] Fix TCP DSACK cwnd handling

2007-09-24 Thread Greg KH
From: Ilpo J?rvinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> commit 49ff4bb4cd4c04acf8f9e3d3ec2148305a1db445 in mainline. [TCP]: DSACK signals data receival, be conservative In case a DSACK is received, it's better to lower cwnd as it's a sign of data receival. Signed-off-by: Ilpo J?rvinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[46/50] Fix TCP DSACK cwnd handling

2007-09-24 Thread Greg KH
From: Ilpo J?rvinen [EMAIL PROTECTED] commit 49ff4bb4cd4c04acf8f9e3d3ec2148305a1db445 in mainline. [TCP]: DSACK signals data receival, be conservative In case a DSACK is received, it's better to lower cwnd as it's a sign of data receival. Signed-off-by: Ilpo J?rvinen [EMAIL PROTECTED]