On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 16:39 -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> What do you mean "adds another incompatibility" ?
>
> That users will have to switch to dmraid when upgrading to v2.6.x ?
which is a rather disruptive and incompatible change. device names
change etc etc.
> SATA is not the same
On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 16:39 -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
What do you mean adds another incompatibility ?
That users will have to switch to dmraid when upgrading to v2.6.x ?
which is a rather disruptive and incompatible change. device names
change etc etc.
SATA is not the same case as
Hi Bart,
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 12:28:04AM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > > [ This mail is just to explain why I don't like iswraid,
> > > I don't care if it gets merged that much... ]
> > >
> > > another BTW: this driver adds another incompatibility between
> > > 2.4.x and
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 16:39:34 -0200, Marcelo Tosatti
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 11:04:09PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 21:05:13 +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 14:35:23 -0500,
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 11:04:09PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 21:05:13 +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 14:35:23 -0500, Bill Davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > > > On
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 21:05:13 +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 14:35:23 -0500, Bill Davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > > On Sun, 06 Feb 2005 10:03:27 -0500, Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> >
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 14:35:23 -0500, Bill Davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > On Sun, 06 Feb 2005 10:03:27 -0500, Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> >>
> I consider it not a new feature, but a missing feature, since
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
On Sun, 06 Feb 2005 10:03:27 -0500, Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
I consider it not a new feature, but a missing feature, since otherwise
user data cannot be accessed in the RAID setups.
the same is true for all new hardware
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
On Sun, 06 Feb 2005 10:03:27 -0500, Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
I consider it not a new feature, but a missing feature, since otherwise
user data cannot be accessed in the RAID setups.
the same is true for all new hardware drivers
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 14:35:23 -0500, Bill Davidsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
On Sun, 06 Feb 2005 10:03:27 -0500, Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
I consider it not a new feature, but a missing feature, since otherwise
user data
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 21:05:13 +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 14:35:23 -0500, Bill Davidsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
On Sun, 06 Feb 2005 10:03:27 -0500, Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Arjan van de Ven
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 11:04:09PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 21:05:13 +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 14:35:23 -0500, Bill Davidsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
On Sun, 06 Feb
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 16:39:34 -0200, Marcelo Tosatti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 11:04:09PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 21:05:13 +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 14:35:23 -0500, Bill Davidsen
Hi Bart,
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 12:28:04AM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
[ This mail is just to explain why I don't like iswraid,
I don't care if it gets merged that much... ]
another BTW: this driver adds another incompatibility between
2.4.x and 2.6.x.
What do
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 03:49:33PM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>
> > I consider it not a new feature, but a missing feature, since otherwise
> > user data cannot be accessed in the RAID setups.
>
> the same is true for all new hardware drivers and hardware support
> patches. And for new DRM
Martins Krikis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I do realize that Intel should have asked a long time ago for it
> to be considered for acceptance (I did ask back in October for
> 2.4.28).
Sorry about all the noise, but I just remembered some other important
aspects that played a role here.
Intel
--- Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I consider it not a new feature, but a missing feature, since
> otherwise
> > user data cannot be accessed in the RAID setups.
>
> the same is true for all new hardware drivers and hardware support
> patches. And for new DRM (since new X
--- Arjan van de Ven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I consider it not a new feature, but a missing feature, since
otherwise
user data cannot be accessed in the RAID setups.
the same is true for all new hardware drivers and hardware support
patches. And for new DRM (since new X may need it)
Martins Krikis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I do realize that Intel should have asked a long time ago for it
to be considered for acceptance (I did ask back in October for
2.4.28).
Sorry about all the noise, but I just remembered some other important
aspects that played a role here.
Intel
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 03:49:33PM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
I consider it not a new feature, but a missing feature, since otherwise
user data cannot be accessed in the RAID setups.
the same is true for all new hardware drivers and hardware support
patches. And for new DRM (since
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 11:09:37AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> I'm talking about being able to access data, or not.
And your point is?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 10:03:27AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Red herring.
2.4.x has ICH5/6 support -- but is missing the RAID support component.
We are talking about hardware that is ALREADY supported by 2.4.x kernel,
not new hardware.
You're talking about software not
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 10:03:27AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Red herring.
>
> 2.4.x has ICH5/6 support -- but is missing the RAID support component.
>
> We are talking about hardware that is ALREADY supported by 2.4.x kernel,
> not new hardware.
You're talking about software not support (the
On Sun, 2005-02-06 at 10:03 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> >>I consider it not a new feature, but a missing feature, since otherwise
> >>user data cannot be accessed in the RAID setups.
> >
> >
> > the same is true for all new hardware drivers and hardware support
> >
On Sun, 06 Feb 2005 10:03:27 -0500, Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> >>I consider it not a new feature, but a missing feature, since otherwise
> >>user data cannot be accessed in the RAID setups.
> >
> >
> > the same is true for all new hardware drivers and
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
I consider it not a new feature, but a missing feature, since otherwise
user data cannot be accessed in the RAID setups.
the same is true for all new hardware drivers and hardware support
patches. And for new DRM (since new X may need it) and new .. and
new ... where is
> I consider it not a new feature, but a missing feature, since otherwise
> user data cannot be accessed in the RAID setups.
the same is true for all new hardware drivers and hardware support
patches. And for new DRM (since new X may need it) and new .. and
new ... where is the line?
for me a
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 09:38:54AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Without device mapper (another new feature) to enable dmraid, these
> users are just sorta S.O.L.
>
> I consider it not a new feature, but a missing feature, since otherwise
> user data cannot be accessed in the RAID setups.
So
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
On Sun, 06 Feb 2005 10:27:56 +0100, Arjan van de Ven
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, 2005-02-05 at 21:36 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Martins Krikis wrote:
Version 0.1.5 of the Intel Sofware RAID driver (iswraid) is now
available for the 2.4 series kernels at
On Sun, 06 Feb 2005 10:27:56 +0100, Arjan van de Ven
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-02-05 at 21:36 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > Martins Krikis wrote:
> > > Version 0.1.5 of the Intel Sofware RAID driver (iswraid) is now
> > > available for the 2.4 series kernels at
> > >
On Sat, 2005-02-05 at 21:36 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Martins Krikis wrote:
> > Version 0.1.5 of the Intel Sofware RAID driver (iswraid) is now
> > available for the 2.4 series kernels at
> > http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/iswraid/2.4.29-iswraid.patch.gz?download
>
> ACK from me
On Sat, 2005-02-05 at 21:36 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Martins Krikis wrote:
Version 0.1.5 of the Intel Sofware RAID driver (iswraid) is now
available for the 2.4 series kernels at
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/iswraid/2.4.29-iswraid.patch.gz?download
ACK from me
personally I
On Sun, 06 Feb 2005 10:27:56 +0100, Arjan van de Ven
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2005-02-05 at 21:36 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Martins Krikis wrote:
Version 0.1.5 of the Intel Sofware RAID driver (iswraid) is now
available for the 2.4 series kernels at
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
On Sun, 06 Feb 2005 10:27:56 +0100, Arjan van de Ven
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2005-02-05 at 21:36 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Martins Krikis wrote:
Version 0.1.5 of the Intel Sofware RAID driver (iswraid) is now
available for the 2.4 series kernels at
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 09:38:54AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Without device mapper (another new feature) to enable dmraid, these
users are just sorta S.O.L.
I consider it not a new feature, but a missing feature, since otherwise
user data cannot be accessed in the RAID setups.
So those
I consider it not a new feature, but a missing feature, since otherwise
user data cannot be accessed in the RAID setups.
the same is true for all new hardware drivers and hardware support
patches. And for new DRM (since new X may need it) and new .. and
new ... where is the line?
for me a
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
I consider it not a new feature, but a missing feature, since otherwise
user data cannot be accessed in the RAID setups.
the same is true for all new hardware drivers and hardware support
patches. And for new DRM (since new X may need it) and new .. and
new ... where is
On Sun, 06 Feb 2005 10:03:27 -0500, Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
I consider it not a new feature, but a missing feature, since otherwise
user data cannot be accessed in the RAID setups.
the same is true for all new hardware drivers and hardware support
On Sun, 2005-02-06 at 10:03 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
I consider it not a new feature, but a missing feature, since otherwise
user data cannot be accessed in the RAID setups.
the same is true for all new hardware drivers and hardware support
patches. And for
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 10:03:27AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Red herring.
2.4.x has ICH5/6 support -- but is missing the RAID support component.
We are talking about hardware that is ALREADY supported by 2.4.x kernel,
not new hardware.
You're talking about software not support (the intel
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 10:03:27AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Red herring.
2.4.x has ICH5/6 support -- but is missing the RAID support component.
We are talking about hardware that is ALREADY supported by 2.4.x kernel,
not new hardware.
You're talking about software not
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 11:09:37AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
I'm talking about being able to access data, or not.
And your point is?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
Martins Krikis wrote:
Version 0.1.5 of the Intel Sofware RAID driver (iswraid) is now
available for the 2.4 series kernels at
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/iswraid/2.4.29-iswraid.patch.gz?download
ACK from me
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the
Martins Krikis wrote:
Version 0.1.5 of the Intel Sofware RAID driver (iswraid) is now
available for the 2.4 series kernels at
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/iswraid/2.4.29-iswraid.patch.gz?download
ACK from me
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body
Version 0.1.5 of the Intel Sofware RAID driver (iswraid) is now
available for the 2.4 series kernels at
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/iswraid/2.4.29-iswraid.patch.gz?download
It is an ataraid "subdriver" but uses the SCSI subsystem to find the
RAID member disks. It depends on the libata
Version 0.1.5 of the Intel Sofware RAID driver (iswraid) is now
available for the 2.4 series kernels at
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/iswraid/2.4.29-iswraid.patch.gz?download
It is an ataraid subdriver but uses the SCSI subsystem to find the
RAID member disks. It depends on the libata
46 matches
Mail list logo
