Re: [BIG] Re: sched rsdl fix for 0.28

On Sunday 11 March 2007 20:21, Con Kolivas wrote: > On Sunday 11 March 2007 20:10, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > Le dimanche 11 mars 2007 à 11:07 +1100, Con Kolivas a écrit : > > > sched rsdl fix > > > > Doesn't change a thing. Always breaks at the same place (though > > depending on hardware

Re: [BIG] Re: sched rsdl fix for 0.28

On Sunday 11 March 2007 20:10, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > Le dimanche 11 mars 2007 à 11:07 +1100, Con Kolivas a écrit : > > sched rsdl fix > > Doesn't change a thing. Always breaks at the same place (though > depending on hardware timings? the trace is not always the same). Pretty > sure nothing

[BIG] Re: sched rsdl fix for 0.28

Le dimanche 11 mars 2007 à 11:07 +1100, Con Kolivas a écrit : > sched rsdl fix Doesn't change a thing. Always breaks at the same place (though depending on hardware timings? the trace is not always the same). Pretty sure nothing happens before this failure -- Nicolas Mailhot signature.asc

[BIG] Re: sched rsdl fix for 0.28

Le dimanche 11 mars 2007 à 11:07 +1100, Con Kolivas a écrit : sched rsdl fix Doesn't change a thing. Always breaks at the same place (though depending on hardware timings? the trace is not always the same). Pretty sure nothing happens before this failure -- Nicolas Mailhot signature.asc

Re: [BIG] Re: sched rsdl fix for 0.28

On Sunday 11 March 2007 20:10, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: Le dimanche 11 mars 2007 à 11:07 +1100, Con Kolivas a écrit : sched rsdl fix Doesn't change a thing. Always breaks at the same place (though depending on hardware timings? the trace is not always the same). Pretty sure nothing happens

Re: [BIG] Re: sched rsdl fix for 0.28

On Sunday 11 March 2007 20:21, Con Kolivas wrote: On Sunday 11 March 2007 20:10, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: Le dimanche 11 mars 2007 à 11:07 +1100, Con Kolivas a écrit : sched rsdl fix Doesn't change a thing. Always breaks at the same place (though depending on hardware timings? the trace