--- Pekka Enberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please try out the following patch to see if we catch a reference
> counting underflow:
>
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20/2.6.20-mm2/broken-out/detect-atomic-counter-underflows.patch
Sure, I can do that.
Cheers,
Hi Chris,
On 3/16/07, Chris Rankin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That would take ages - the only reason I kept on plugging away with winecfg
last night
was because I was fairly certain the kernel was going to "oops" eventually
(which it did).
But when exactly would I be able to declare a kernel
--- Pekka Enberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/16/07, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is there any way you can use 'git bisect' to try to track down the root
> > cause of this?
>
> Chris, If 2.6.19 works for you, could you please do a git bisect for
> this bug? See the following URL
On 3/16/07, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there any way you can use 'git bisect' to try to track down the root
cause of this?
Chris, If 2.6.19 works for you, could you please do a git bisect for
this bug? See the following URL for details:
On 3/16/07, Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any way you can use 'git bisect' to try to track down the root
cause of this?
Chris, If 2.6.19 works for you, could you please do a git bisect for
this bug? See the following URL for details:
--- Pekka Enberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/16/07, Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any way you can use 'git bisect' to try to track down the root
cause of this?
Chris, If 2.6.19 works for you, could you please do a git bisect for
this bug? See the following URL for details:
Hi Chris,
On 3/16/07, Chris Rankin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That would take ages - the only reason I kept on plugging away with winecfg
last night
was because I was fairly certain the kernel was going to oops eventually
(which it did).
But when exactly would I be able to declare a kernel good
--- Pekka Enberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please try out the following patch to see if we catch a reference
counting underflow:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20/2.6.20-mm2/broken-out/detect-atomic-counter-underflows.patch
Sure, I can do that.
Cheers,
Chris
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 01:23:02PM +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> I think there's some sort of reference counting problem with sysfs in
> 2.6.20 kernels. Can you please help us debug it further?
Is there any way you can use 'git bisect' to try to track down the root
cause of this?
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 01:23:02PM +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote:
Hi Greg,
I think there's some sort of reference counting problem with sysfs in
2.6.20 kernels. Can you please help us debug it further?
Is there any way you can use 'git bisect' to try to track down the root
cause of this?
Hi Greg,
I think there's some sort of reference counting problem with sysfs in
2.6.20 kernels. Can you please help us debug it further?
On 3/10/07, Chris Rankin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It looks like 2.6.20.2 is still doing Bad Things in /sys.
BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at
Hi Chris,
On 3/10/07, Chris Rankin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It looks like 2.6.20.2 is still doing Bad Things in /sys.
I have seen other reports of this too so can you please open a bug at
bugzilla.kernel.org so this is not lost in the noise?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
Hi Chris,
On 3/10/07, Chris Rankin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It looks like 2.6.20.2 is still doing Bad Things in /sys.
I have seen other reports of this too so can you please open a bug at
bugzilla.kernel.org so this is not lost in the noise?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
Hi Greg,
I think there's some sort of reference counting problem with sysfs in
2.6.20 kernels. Can you please help us debug it further?
On 3/10/07, Chris Rankin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It looks like 2.6.20.2 is still doing Bad Things in /sys.
BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at
Hi,
It looks like 2.6.20.2 is still doing Bad Things in /sys.
Cheers,
Chris
BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 6b6b6d6b
printing eip:
c01300ff
*pde =
Oops: 0002 [#1]
PREEMPT SMP
Modules linked in: radeon drm pwc eeprom cpufreq_ondemand p4_clockmod
Hi,
It looks like 2.6.20.2 is still doing Bad Things in /sys.
Cheers,
Chris
BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 6b6b6d6b
printing eip:
c01300ff
*pde =
Oops: 0002 [#1]
PREEMPT SMP
Modules linked in: radeon drm pwc eeprom cpufreq_ondemand p4_clockmod
16 matches
Mail list logo
