On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 02/02/2015 06:50 AM, Jinpu Wang wrote:
>> Hi Jens,
>>
>> I found 2 patches commits (74170118b & e09aae7e)from
>>
On 02/02/2015 06:50 AM, Jinpu Wang wrote:
> Hi Jens,
>
> I found 2 patches commits (74170118b & e09aae7e)from
>
Hi Jens,
I found 2 patches commits (74170118b & e09aae7e)from
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git/log/?h=for-linus
After apply those 2 patches, the bug was fixed.
Is it possible to include those 2 patches in official 3.19.0?
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 12:11 PM,
When rmmod null_blk lead to GPF below:
[ 29.193712] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): ib0: link becomes ready
[ 62.216289] general protection fault: [#1] SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
[ 62.216586] Dumping ftrace buffer:
[ 62.216660](ftrace buffer empty)
[ 62.216730] Modules linked in:
Hi Jens,
I found 2 patches commits (74170118b e09aae7e)from
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git/log/?h=for-linus
After apply those 2 patches, the bug was fixed.
Is it possible to include those 2 patches in official 3.19.0?
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 12:11 PM, Jinpu
When rmmod null_blk lead to GPF below:
[ 29.193712] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): ib0: link becomes ready
[ 62.216289] general protection fault: [#1] SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
[ 62.216586] Dumping ftrace buffer:
[ 62.216660](ftrace buffer empty)
[ 62.216730] Modules linked in:
On 02/02/2015 06:50 AM, Jinpu Wang wrote:
Hi Jens,
I found 2 patches commits (74170118b e09aae7e)from
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Jens Axboe ax...@fb.com wrote:
On 02/02/2015 06:50 AM, Jinpu Wang wrote:
Hi Jens,
I found 2 patches commits (74170118b e09aae7e)from
8 matches
Mail list logo