Re: [BUG sparc64] 2.6.22-rc broke X on Ultra5

2007-06-09 Thread Dmitry Artamonow
Good day! Sorry for intruding, but I'm seeing the same problem on my U10 with 2.6.22-rc3 and Xorg-7.1+gentoo patches. On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 04:22:10PM -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 13:01:40 -0700 (PDT) > > > From: Mikael

Re: [BUG sparc64] 2.6.22-rc broke X on Ultra5

2007-06-09 Thread Dmitry Artamonow
Good day! Sorry for intruding, but I'm seeing the same problem on my U10 with 2.6.22-rc3 and Xorg-7.1+gentoo patches. On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 04:22:10PM -0700, David Miller wrote: From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 13:01:40 -0700 (PDT) From: Mikael Pettersson

Re: [BUG sparc64] 2.6.22-rc broke X on Ultra5

2007-06-07 Thread David Miller
From: Mikael Pettersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 08:24:57 +0200 (MEST) > I'm away from my ultra5 right now, but I should be able to do > this test on Monday next week. Thank you. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message

Re: [BUG sparc64] 2.6.22-rc broke X on Ultra5

2007-06-07 Thread Mikael Pettersson
On Wed, 06 Jun 2007 16:22:10 -0700 (PDT), David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From: Mikael Pettersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 21:33:18 +0200 (MEST) > > > > > You were spot on. 2.6.21 + patches up to but not including > > > the first one above works. Adding that one

Re: [BUG sparc64] 2.6.22-rc broke X on Ultra5

2007-06-07 Thread Mikael Pettersson
On Wed, 06 Jun 2007 16:22:10 -0700 (PDT), David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Mikael Pettersson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 21:33:18 +0200 (MEST) You were spot on. 2.6.21 + patches up to but not including the first one above works. Adding that one gave me a

Re: [BUG sparc64] 2.6.22-rc broke X on Ultra5

2007-06-07 Thread David Miller
From: Mikael Pettersson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 08:24:57 +0200 (MEST) I'm away from my ultra5 right now, but I should be able to do this test on Monday next week. Thank you. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to

Re: [BUG sparc64] 2.6.22-rc broke X on Ultra5

2007-06-06 Thread David Miller
From: David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 13:01:40 -0700 (PDT) > From: Mikael Pettersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 21:33:18 +0200 (MEST) > > > You were spot on. 2.6.21 + patches up to but not including > > the first one above works. Adding that one gave me

Re: [BUG sparc64] 2.6.22-rc broke X on Ultra5

2007-06-06 Thread David Miller
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 13:01:40 -0700 (PDT) From: Mikael Pettersson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 21:33:18 +0200 (MEST) You were spot on. 2.6.21 + patches up to but not including the first one above works. Adding that one gave me a kernel

Re: [BUG sparc64] 2.6.22-rc broke X on Ultra5

2007-05-30 Thread David Miller
From: Mikael Pettersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 21:33:18 +0200 (MEST) > You were spot on. 2.6.21 + patches up to but not including > the first one above works. Adding that one gave me a kernel > that wouldn't boot (hung after "uncompressing kernel"). > Adding the second one

Re: [BUG sparc64] 2.6.22-rc broke X on Ultra5

2007-05-30 Thread Mikael Pettersson
On Tue, 22 May 2007 02:05:34 -0700 (PDT), David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Mikael Pettersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 10:40:53 +0200 > > > 2.6.21 works fine on my Ultra5, but with 2.6.22-rc the X > > server (from Aurora 2) fails to mmap() the PCI frame buffer >

Re: [BUG sparc64] 2.6.22-rc broke X on Ultra5

2007-05-30 Thread David Miller
From: Mikael Pettersson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 21:33:18 +0200 (MEST) You were spot on. 2.6.21 + patches up to but not including the first one above works. Adding that one gave me a kernel that wouldn't boot (hung after uncompressing kernel). Adding the second one above gave

Re: [BUG sparc64] 2.6.22-rc broke X on Ultra5

2007-05-30 Thread Mikael Pettersson
On Tue, 22 May 2007 02:05:34 -0700 (PDT), David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Mikael Pettersson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 10:40:53 +0200 2.6.21 works fine on my Ultra5, but with 2.6.22-rc the X server (from Aurora 2) fails to mmap() the PCI frame buffer (atyfb).

Re: [BUG sparc64] 2.6.22-rc broke X on Ultra5

2007-05-22 Thread David Miller
From: Mikael Pettersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 10:40:53 +0200 > 2.6.21 works fine on my Ultra5, but with 2.6.22-rc the X > server (from Aurora 2) fails to mmap() the PCI frame buffer > (atyfb). > > I noticed a lot of PCI-related changes both in `dmesg' and >

[BUG sparc64] 2.6.22-rc broke X on Ultra5

2007-05-22 Thread Mikael Pettersson
Just a FYI: 2.6.21 works fine on my Ultra5, but with 2.6.22-rc the X server (from Aurora 2) fails to mmap() the PCI frame buffer (atyfb). I noticed a lot of PCI-related changes both in `dmesg' and /var/log/Xorg.0.log between 2.6.21 and 2.6.22-rc, so my guess is that PCI resources get broken

[BUG sparc64] 2.6.22-rc broke X on Ultra5

2007-05-22 Thread Mikael Pettersson
Just a FYI: 2.6.21 works fine on my Ultra5, but with 2.6.22-rc the X server (from Aurora 2) fails to mmap() the PCI frame buffer (atyfb). I noticed a lot of PCI-related changes both in `dmesg' and /var/log/Xorg.0.log between 2.6.21 and 2.6.22-rc, so my guess is that PCI resources get broken

Re: [BUG sparc64] 2.6.22-rc broke X on Ultra5

2007-05-22 Thread David Miller
From: Mikael Pettersson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 10:40:53 +0200 2.6.21 works fine on my Ultra5, but with 2.6.22-rc the X server (from Aurora 2) fails to mmap() the PCI frame buffer (atyfb). I noticed a lot of PCI-related changes both in `dmesg' and /var/log/Xorg.0.log