On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Boris Ostrovsky
wrote:
> On 07/03/2014 01:52 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 02:28:36PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, 1 Jul 2014 00:09:13 -0400 Steven Rostedt
>>> wrote:
>>>
Testing the latest kernel (3.16-rc3) I
On 07/03/2014 01:52 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 02:28:36PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jul 2014 00:09:13 -0400 Steven Rostedt wrote:
Testing the latest kernel (3.16-rc3) I hit this build bug:
VDSO2C arch/x86/vdso/vdso-image-64.c
Error: too many
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 02:28:36PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Jul 2014 00:09:13 -0400 Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> > Testing the latest kernel (3.16-rc3) I hit this build bug:
> >
> > VDSO2C arch/x86/vdso/vdso-image-64.c
> > Error: too many copied sections (max = 13)
> >
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 02:28:36PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jul 2014 00:09:13 -0400 Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote:
Testing the latest kernel (3.16-rc3) I hit this build bug:
VDSO2C arch/x86/vdso/vdso-image-64.c
Error: too many copied sections (max = 13)
On 07/03/2014 01:52 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 02:28:36PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jul 2014 00:09:13 -0400 Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote:
Testing the latest kernel (3.16-rc3) I hit this build bug:
VDSO2C arch/x86/vdso/vdso-image-64.c
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Boris Ostrovsky
boris.ostrov...@oracle.com wrote:
On 07/03/2014 01:52 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 02:28:36PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jul 2014 00:09:13 -0400 Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org
wrote:
Testing the
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 2:28 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Jul 2014 00:09:13 -0400 Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
>> Testing the latest kernel (3.16-rc3) I hit this build bug:
>>
>> VDSO2C arch/x86/vdso/vdso-image-64.c
>> Error: too many copied sections (max = 13)
>>
On Tue, 1 Jul 2014 00:09:13 -0400 Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Testing the latest kernel (3.16-rc3) I hit this build bug:
>
> VDSO2C arch/x86/vdso/vdso-image-64.c
> Error: too many copied sections (max = 13)
> /arch/x86/vdso/Makefile:61: recipe for target 'arch/x86/vdso/vdso-image-64.c'
> failed
On 07/02/2014 01:07 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 1:05 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> On 07/02/2014 01:00 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>>
>>> I managed to munge the binutils sources enough to build binutils 2.21.
>>> This seems to be a binutils bug: ld generates an empty
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 1:05 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 07/02/2014 01:00 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>
>> I managed to munge the binutils sources enough to build binutils 2.21.
>> This seems to be a binutils bug: ld generates an empty .rela.dyn.
>> Fortunately, it's not generating a DT_RELA
On 07/02/2014 01:00 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
> I managed to munge the binutils sources enough to build binutils 2.21.
> This seems to be a binutils bug: ld generates an empty .rela.dyn.
> Fortunately, it's not generating a DT_RELA dynamic entry.
>
Not sure if that is a bug. Unnecessary,
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 9:09 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Testing the latest kernel (3.16-rc3) I hit this build bug:
>
> VDSO2C arch/x86/vdso/vdso-image-64.c
> Error: too many copied sections (max = 13)
> /arch/x86/vdso/Makefile:61: recipe for target 'arch/x86/vdso/vdso-image-64.c'
> failed
>
On Mon, 30 Jun 2014 22:09:18 -0700
Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> I just successfully built your config, albeit with a different
> toolchain. Can you do:
>
> for i in arch/x86/vdso/*.so.dbg; do echo $i; eu-readelf -S $i; done
>
> after a failed build?
>
> Let the game of section whack-a-mole
On Mon, 30 Jun 2014 22:09:18 -0700
Andy Lutomirski l...@amacapital.net wrote:
I just successfully built your config, albeit with a different
toolchain. Can you do:
for i in arch/x86/vdso/*.so.dbg; do echo $i; eu-readelf -S $i; done
after a failed build?
Let the game of section
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 9:09 PM, Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote:
Testing the latest kernel (3.16-rc3) I hit this build bug:
VDSO2C arch/x86/vdso/vdso-image-64.c
Error: too many copied sections (max = 13)
/arch/x86/vdso/Makefile:61: recipe for target
On 07/02/2014 01:00 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
I managed to munge the binutils sources enough to build binutils 2.21.
This seems to be a binutils bug: ld generates an empty .rela.dyn.
Fortunately, it's not generating a DT_RELA dynamic entry.
Not sure if that is a bug. Unnecessary, yes,
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 1:05 PM, H. Peter Anvin h...@zytor.com wrote:
On 07/02/2014 01:00 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
I managed to munge the binutils sources enough to build binutils 2.21.
This seems to be a binutils bug: ld generates an empty .rela.dyn.
Fortunately, it's not generating a
On 07/02/2014 01:07 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 1:05 PM, H. Peter Anvin h...@zytor.com wrote:
On 07/02/2014 01:00 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
I managed to munge the binutils sources enough to build binutils 2.21.
This seems to be a binutils bug: ld generates an empty
On Tue, 1 Jul 2014 00:09:13 -0400 Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote:
Testing the latest kernel (3.16-rc3) I hit this build bug:
VDSO2C arch/x86/vdso/vdso-image-64.c
Error: too many copied sections (max = 13)
/arch/x86/vdso/Makefile:61: recipe for target
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 2:28 PM, Andrew Morton a...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jul 2014 00:09:13 -0400 Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote:
Testing the latest kernel (3.16-rc3) I hit this build bug:
VDSO2C arch/x86/vdso/vdso-image-64.c
Error: too many copied sections (max =
On Mon, 30 Jun 2014 22:09:18 -0700
Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
> for i in arch/x86/vdso/*.so.dbg; do echo $i; eu-readelf -S $i; done
>
> after a failed build?
>
> Let the game of section whack-a-mole begin.
As this is just a compile failure, I can work on this even while it
builds for my test
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 7:49 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jun 2014 22:09:18 -0700
> Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
>
>> I just successfully built your config, albeit with a different
>> toolchain. Can you do:
>>
>> for i in arch/x86/vdso/*.so.dbg; do echo $i; eu-readelf -S $i; done
>>
>>
On Mon, 30 Jun 2014 22:09:18 -0700
Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> I just successfully built your config, albeit with a different
> toolchain. Can you do:
>
> for i in arch/x86/vdso/*.so.dbg; do echo $i; eu-readelf -S $i; done
>
> after a failed build?
I'll have to do this tomorrow. My boxes are
On Mon, 30 Jun 2014 22:09:18 -0700
Andy Lutomirski l...@amacapital.net wrote:
I just successfully built your config, albeit with a different
toolchain. Can you do:
for i in arch/x86/vdso/*.so.dbg; do echo $i; eu-readelf -S $i; done
after a failed build?
I'll have to do this tomorrow.
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 7:49 AM, Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jun 2014 22:09:18 -0700
Andy Lutomirski l...@amacapital.net wrote:
I just successfully built your config, albeit with a different
toolchain. Can you do:
for i in arch/x86/vdso/*.so.dbg; do echo $i;
On Mon, 30 Jun 2014 22:09:18 -0700
Andy Lutomirski l...@amacapital.net wrote:
for i in arch/x86/vdso/*.so.dbg; do echo $i; eu-readelf -S $i; done
after a failed build?
Let the game of section whack-a-mole begin.
As this is just a compile failure, I can work on this even while it
builds
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 9:09 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Testing the latest kernel (3.16-rc3) I hit this build bug:
>
> VDSO2C arch/x86/vdso/vdso-image-64.c
> Error: too many copied sections (max = 13)
> /arch/x86/vdso/Makefile:61: recipe for target 'arch/x86/vdso/vdso-image-64.c'
> failed
>
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 9:09 PM, Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote:
Testing the latest kernel (3.16-rc3) I hit this build bug:
VDSO2C arch/x86/vdso/vdso-image-64.c
Error: too many copied sections (max = 13)
/arch/x86/vdso/Makefile:61: recipe for target
28 matches
Mail list logo
