tel Corporation
>>> todd.fujin...@intel.com
>>> (503) 712-4565
>>>
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Ethan Zhao [mailto:ethan.ker...@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 7:10 PM
>>> To: Fujinaka, Todd
&
t; todd.fujin...@intel.com
>> (503) 712-4565
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Ethan Zhao [mailto:ethan.ker...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 7:10 PM
>> To: Fujinaka, Todd
>> Cc: Joe Jin; Ben Hutchings; Mary Mcgrath; net...@vger.
..@vger.kernel.org;
> e1000-de...@lists.sf.net; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-pci
> Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang
>
> Joe,
> Possibly your customer is running a kernel without source code on a
> platform whose vendor wouldn't like to fix BIOS is
Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang
Joe,
Possibly your customer is running a kernel without source code on a
platform whose vendor wouldn't like to fix BIOS issue( Is that a HP/Dell
server ?).
Anyway, to see if is a payload issue or, you could change
: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 7:10 PM
To: Fujinaka, Todd
Cc: Joe Jin; Ben Hutchings; Mary Mcgrath; net...@vger.kernel.org;
e1000-de...@lists.sf.net; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-pci
Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang
Joe,
Possibly your customer is running
...@vger.kernel.org;
e1000-de...@lists.sf.net; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-pci
Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang
Joe,
Possibly your customer is running a kernel without source code on a
platform whose vendor wouldn't like to fix BIOS issue( Is that a HP/Dell
@vger.kernel.org; linux-pci
Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang
Joe,
Possibly your customer is running a kernel without source code on a
platform whose vendor wouldn't like to fix BIOS issue( Is that a HP/Dell server
?).
Anyway, to see if is a payload issue
@vger.kernel.org; linux-pci
Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang
Joe,
Possibly your customer is running a kernel without source code on a
platform whose vendor wouldn't like to fix BIOS issue( Is that a HP/Dell server
?).
Anyway, to see if is a payload issue
ent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 12:31 AM
> To: Ben Hutchings
> Cc: Fujinaka, Todd; Mary Mcgrath; net...@vger.kernel.org;
> e1000-de...@lists.sf.net; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-pci
> Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang
>
> On 11/28/12 02:10, Ben Hut
-
From: Joe Jin [mailto:joe@oracle.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 12:31 AM
To: Ben Hutchings
Cc: Fujinaka, Todd; Mary Mcgrath; net...@vger.kernel.org;
e1000-de...@lists.sf.net; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-pci
Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang
On 11/28/12 02:10, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 17:32 +, Fujinaka, Todd wrote:
>> Forgive me if I'm being too repetitious as I think some of this has
>> been mentioned in the past.
>>
>> We (and by we I mean the Ethernet part and driver) can only change the
>> advertised
On 11/28/12 02:10, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 17:32 +, Fujinaka, Todd wrote:
Forgive me if I'm being too repetitious as I think some of this has
been mentioned in the past.
We (and by we I mean the Ethernet part and driver) can only change the
advertised availability of a
-
From: Joe Jin [mailto:joe@oracle.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 12:31 AM
To: Ben Hutchings
Cc: Fujinaka, Todd; Mary Mcgrath; net...@vger.kernel.org;
e1000-de...@lists.sf.net; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-pci
Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang
To: Ben Hutchings
Cc: Fujinaka, Todd; Mary Mcgrath; net...@vger.kernel.org;
e1000-de...@lists.sf.net; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-pci
Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang
On 11/28/12 02:10, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 17:32 +, Fujinaka
, 2012 10:11 AM
To: Fujinaka, Todd; Mary Mcgrath
Cc: Joe Jin; net...@vger.kernel.org; e1000-de...@lists.sf.net;
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-pci
Subject: RE: [E1000-devel] 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang
On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 17:32 +, Fujinaka, Todd wrote:
> Forgive me if I'm be
On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 17:32 +, Fujinaka, Todd wrote:
> Forgive me if I'm being too repetitious as I think some of this has
> been mentioned in the past.
>
> We (and by we I mean the Ethernet part and driver) can only change the
> advertised availability of a larger MaxPayloadSize. The size is
al Message-
From: Mary Mcgrath [mailto:mary.mcgr...@oracle.com]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 6:07 PM
To: Joe Jin
Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org; e1000-de...@lists.sf.net;
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang
Joe
Thank you for working this.
Mcgrath [mailto:mary.mcgr...@oracle.com]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 6:07 PM
To: Joe Jin
Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org; e1000-de...@lists.sf.net;
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang
Joe
Thank you for working this.
I would love to find out
On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 17:32 +, Fujinaka, Todd wrote:
Forgive me if I'm being too repetitious as I think some of this has
been mentioned in the past.
We (and by we I mean the Ethernet part and driver) can only change the
advertised availability of a larger MaxPayloadSize. The size is
, 2012 10:11 AM
To: Fujinaka, Todd; Mary Mcgrath
Cc: Joe Jin; net...@vger.kernel.org; e1000-de...@lists.sf.net;
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-pci
Subject: RE: [E1000-devel] 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang
On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 17:32 +, Fujinaka, Todd wrote:
Forgive me if I'm being
in, thank you.
Regards
Mary
-Original Message-
From: Joe Jin
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 8:00 PM
To: Fujinaka, Todd
Cc: Dave, Tushar N; net...@vger.kernel.org; e1000-de...@lists.sf.net;
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Mary Mcgrath
Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] 82571EB: Detected Hardware
On 11/27/12 00:23, Fujinaka, Todd wrote:
> If you look at the previous section, DevCap, you'll see that it's
> correctly advertising 256 bytes but the system is negotiating 128 for
> the link to the Ethernet controller. Things on the "other" side of the
> link are controlled outside of the e1000
On Tue, 20 Nov 2012, Joe Jin wrote:
> On 11/20/12 16:59, Dave, Tushar N wrote:
>> Have you power off the system completely after modifying eeprom? If not
>> please do so.
>
> Hi Tushar,
>
> Seems not works for me, would you please help to check what is wrong of my
> operations?
...
> # lspci
On Tue, 20 Nov 2012, Joe Jin wrote:
On 11/20/12 16:59, Dave, Tushar N wrote:
Have you power off the system completely after modifying eeprom? If not
please do so.
Hi Tushar,
Seems not works for me, would you please help to check what is wrong of my
operations?
...
# lspci -s
On 11/27/12 00:23, Fujinaka, Todd wrote:
If you look at the previous section, DevCap, you'll see that it's
correctly advertising 256 bytes but the system is negotiating 128 for
the link to the Ethernet controller. Things on the other side of the
link are controlled outside of the e1000 driver.
you.
Regards
Mary
-Original Message-
From: Joe Jin
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 8:00 PM
To: Fujinaka, Todd
Cc: Dave, Tushar N; net...@vger.kernel.org; e1000-de...@lists.sf.net;
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Mary Mcgrath
Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang
26 matches
Mail list logo
