On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 23:07 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> CC'ed Jes,
>
> On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 14:15:53 +0300
> Evgeniy Dushistov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 01:24:25PM +0200, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > This is a bit of a rash of bug fixes. The qla1280 is actually
CC'ed Jes,
On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 14:15:53 +0300
Evgeniy Dushistov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 01:24:25PM +0200, James Bottomley wrote:
> > This is a bit of a rash of bug fixes. The qla1280 is actually a bug fix
> > (in spite of the title---it's actually correcting an
On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 01:24:25PM +0200, James Bottomley wrote:
> This is a bit of a rash of bug fixes. The qla1280 is actually a bug fix
> (in spite of the title---it's actually correcting an existing problem
> with the qla1280 implementation of accessors that broke the current
> driver).
>
On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 01:24:25PM +0200, James Bottomley wrote:
This is a bit of a rash of bug fixes. The qla1280 is actually a bug fix
(in spite of the title---it's actually correcting an existing problem
with the qla1280 implementation of accessors that broke the current
driver).
CC'ed Jes,
On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 14:15:53 +0300
Evgeniy Dushistov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 01:24:25PM +0200, James Bottomley wrote:
This is a bit of a rash of bug fixes. The qla1280 is actually a bug fix
(in spite of the title---it's actually correcting an existing
This is a bit of a rash of bug fixes. The qla1280 is actually a bug fix
(in spite of the title---it's actually correcting an existing problem
with the qla1280 implementation of accessors that broke the current
driver).
The patch is available here:
This is a bit of a rash of bug fixes. The qla1280 is actually a bug fix
(in spite of the title---it's actually correcting an existing problem
with the qla1280 implementation of accessors that broke the current
driver).
The patch is available here:
7 matches
Mail list logo