On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 7:27 AM Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
> > Well, being in linux-next should have found it too. I know linux-next
> > had a lot of kvm stuff in it, was this not there?
>
> It was, I suppose that's how Arnd found it.
Ok, apparently the 0day bot doesn't trigger this case, or it's jus
On 13/06/2018 15:56, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 3:09 AM Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>
>> On 13/06/2018 04:18, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>>>
>>> Hmm? And why was this not found before it hit my tree?
>>
>> Because I should do more "make randconfig"s, probably.
>
> Well, being in linux-n
On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 4:00 AM Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>
> This was reported before by Arnd Bergmann:
>
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg169536.html
>
> but it seems his patch got lost.
So I think his patch is closer to what the code *should* do. Mine was
a big ugly #if around the whole th
On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 3:09 AM Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
> On 13/06/2018 04:18, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> > Hmm? And why was this not found before it hit my tree?
>
> Because I should do more "make randconfig"s, probably.
Well, being in linux-next should have found it too. I know linux-next
had a
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 07:43:50PM +0100, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 7:03 AM Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git tags/for-linus
>
> Grr. Several tedious conflicts. I fixed them all up, and they all
> looked trivial, but since most of t
Paolo Bonzini writes:
> On 13/06/2018 04:18, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 7:03 AM Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>
>>> * x86: many bugfixes, implement more Hyper-V super powers,
>>
>> Uhhuh, I didn't notice this initially, because my basic sanity tests
>> are with everything enabled
On 13/06/2018 04:18, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 7:03 AM Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>
>> * x86: many bugfixes, implement more Hyper-V super powers,
>
> Uhhuh, I didn't notice this initially, because my basic sanity tests
> are with everything enabled, but this breaks the build:
>
On Wed, 13 Jun 2018 at 12:53, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 9:49 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
> wrote:
> I'm going to be start traveling towards Japan and China tomorrow
> morning, so I wanted to just get the problems I noticed out of my
Great!, welcome to our country(China), and l
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 9:49 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> The revert is fine, I'll work on the kvm debugfs file stuff for 4.19.
Yeah, I did two fairly brute-force fixes for two different issues
(the only common thread was kvm - testing the first fix was what then
got me to the debugfs revert
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 08:52:08PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 8:26 PM Linus Torvalds
> wrote:
> >
> > Ok, so commit 95cde3c59966 ("debugfs: inode: debugfs_create_dir uses
> > mode permission from parent") breaks lkvm, and I think qemu-kvm too.
> >
> > The commit looks l
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 08:26:46PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 8:00 PM Linus Torvalds
> wrote:
> >
> > Yeah, the biusection seems to actually be diving into Greg's device pulls.
> >
> > Odd. I'm not seeing why that would break kvm, but maybe there's
> > something in the
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 8:26 PM Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> Ok, so commit 95cde3c59966 ("debugfs: inode: debugfs_create_dir uses
> mode permission from parent") breaks lkvm, and I think qemu-kvm too.
>
> The commit looks like the RightThing(tm) to do, but we do not break
> existing work-flows, no ma
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 8:00 PM Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> Yeah, the biusection seems to actually be diving into Greg's device pulls.
>
> Odd. I'm not seeing why that would break kvm, but maybe there's
> something in the device core layer that really messed it up.
>
> I'll continue to bisect to see
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 7:51 PM Wanpeng Li wrote:
> >
> > Bisecting. But that's unrelated to the recent kvm build breakage.
>
> Yeah, it happens before the KVM GIT PULL on Linus's tree, you will see
> the warning above unless you lauch the guest w/ root user, maybe other
> subsystems' modification
On Wed, 13 Jun 2018 at 10:42, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 7:18 PM Linus Torvalds
> wrote:
> >
> > The attached patch _may_ be the right thing to do. It's not pretty.
>
> .. and when I decided to actually do some minimal kvm testing with
> that patch, I notice that we've appa
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 7:18 PM Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> The attached patch _may_ be the right thing to do. It's not pretty.
.. and when I decided to actually do some minimal kvm testing with
that patch, I notice that we've apparently broken kvm entirely during
this merge window, and I just get
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 7:03 AM Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
> * x86: many bugfixes, implement more Hyper-V super powers,
Uhhuh, I didn't notice this initially, because my basic sanity tests
are with everything enabled, but this breaks the build:
ERROR: "ms_hyperv" [arch/x86/kvm/kvm-intel.ko] undefi
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 7:03 AM Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git tags/for-linus
Grr. Several tedious conflicts. I fixed them all up, and they all
looked trivial, but since most of them were to ARM cases, I couldn't
even test the end result.
I suspect the '
Linus,
The following changes since commit 73fcb1a370c76b202d406e95d9dabb76eaccf484:
Merge branch 'akpm' (patches from Andrew) (2018-05-18 21:24:26 -0700)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git tags/for-linus
for you to fetch changes up to 766
19 matches
Mail list logo