On 09/05/2014 07:10 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 09/05/2014 11:03 AM, Arne Wiebalck wrote:
>>
>> On Sep 5, 2014, at 6:41 PM, Peter Kieser
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 2014-09-05 8:37 AM, Eddie Chapman wrote:
On 05/09/14 15:17, Jens Axboe wrote:
> (from oldest to newest). And that's just from
On 09/05/2014 07:10 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 09/05/2014 11:03 AM, Arne Wiebalck wrote:
On Sep 5, 2014, at 6:41 PM, Peter Kieser pe...@kieser.ca
wrote:
On 2014-09-05 8:37 AM, Eddie Chapman wrote:
On 05/09/14 15:17, Jens Axboe wrote:
(from oldest to newest). And that's just from 3.16 to
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 04:17:55PM -0700, Peter Kieser wrote:
>
> On 2014-09-05 2:45 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> >Just because a maintainer/developer doesn't want to do anything for the
> >stable kernel releases does_NOT_ mean the code is
> >"unstable/expreimental" at all.
>
> These are more
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 04:21:48PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 09/05/2014 03:45 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 09:31:06AM +0200, Francis Moreau wrote:
> >> On 08/10/2014 09:54 AM, Peter Kieser wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 2014-08-05 9:58 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 08/04/2014 10:33
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 04:21:48PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 09/05/2014 03:45 PM, Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 09:31:06AM +0200, Francis Moreau wrote:
On 08/10/2014 09:54 AM, Peter Kieser wrote:
On 2014-08-05 9:58 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 08/04/2014 10:33 PM, Kent Overstreet
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 04:17:55PM -0700, Peter Kieser wrote:
On 2014-09-05 2:45 PM, Greg KH wrote:
Just because a maintainer/developer doesn't want to do anything for the
stable kernel releases does_NOT_ mean the code is
unstable/expreimental at all.
These are more bcache-ate-my-data
On 09/05/2014 11:45 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 09:31:06AM +0200, Francis Moreau wrote:
>> On 08/10/2014 09:54 AM, Peter Kieser wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2014-08-05 9:58 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 08/04/2014 10:33 PM, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> Hey Jens, here's the pull request for
On 09/05/2014 11:45 PM, Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 09:31:06AM +0200, Francis Moreau wrote:
On 08/10/2014 09:54 AM, Peter Kieser wrote:
On 2014-08-05 9:58 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 08/04/2014 10:33 PM, Kent Overstreet wrote:
Hey Jens, here's the pull request for 3.17 - typically
On Fri, 5 Sep 2014 17:03:57 +
Arne Wiebalck wrote:
>
> On Sep 5, 2014, at 6:41 PM, Peter Kieser
> wrote:
>
> >
> > On 2014-09-05 8:37 AM, Eddie Chapman wrote:
> >> On 05/09/14 15:17, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >>> (from oldest to newest). And that's just from 3.16 to 3.17-rc3,
> >>> going all
On 2014-09-05 2:45 PM, Greg KH wrote:
Just because a maintainer/developer doesn't want to do anything for the
stable kernel releases does_NOT_ mean the code is
"unstable/expreimental" at all.
These are more bcache-ate-my-data unstable bugs. It's standard practice
to backport fixes that
On 09/05/2014 03:45 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 09:31:06AM +0200, Francis Moreau wrote:
>> On 08/10/2014 09:54 AM, Peter Kieser wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2014-08-05 9:58 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 08/04/2014 10:33 PM, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> Hey Jens, here's the pull request for
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 04:44:13PM +0200, Francis Moreau wrote:
> On 09/05/2014 04:17 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >
> > We need to do something about this. From this latest pull, looks like
> > all should go to stable:
> >
> > 5b1016e62f74c53e0330403025954c8d95384c03
> >
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 09:31:06AM +0200, Francis Moreau wrote:
> On 08/10/2014 09:54 AM, Peter Kieser wrote:
> >
> > On 2014-08-05 9:58 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >> On 08/04/2014 10:33 PM, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> >>> Hey Jens, here's the pull request for 3.17 - typically late, but lots of
> >>>
Am 05.09.2014 20:33, schrieb Kent Overstreet:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 11:10:13AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 09/05/2014 11:03 AM, Arne Wiebalck wrote:
On Sep 5, 2014, at 6:41 PM, Peter Kieser
wrote:
On 2014-09-05 8:37 AM, Eddie Chapman wrote:
On 05/09/14 15:17, Jens Axboe wrote:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 11:10:13AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 09/05/2014 11:03 AM, Arne Wiebalck wrote:
> >
> > On Sep 5, 2014, at 6:41 PM, Peter Kieser
> > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On 2014-09-05 8:37 AM, Eddie Chapman wrote:
> >>> On 05/09/14 15:17, Jens Axboe wrote:
> (from oldest to
On 09/05/2014 11:03 AM, Arne Wiebalck wrote:
>
> On Sep 5, 2014, at 6:41 PM, Peter Kieser
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 2014-09-05 8:37 AM, Eddie Chapman wrote:
>>> On 05/09/14 15:17, Jens Axboe wrote:
(from oldest to newest). And that's just from 3.16 to 3.17-rc3, going
all the way back to
On Sep 5, 2014, at 6:41 PM, Peter Kieser
wrote:
>
> On 2014-09-05 8:37 AM, Eddie Chapman wrote:
>> On 05/09/14 15:17, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> (from oldest to newest). And that's just from 3.16 to 3.17-rc3, going
>>> all the way back to 3.10 would be a lot of work. If there's anyone that
>>>
On 2014-09-05 8:37 AM, Eddie Chapman wrote:
On 05/09/14 15:17, Jens Axboe wrote:
(from oldest to newest). And that's just from 3.16 to 3.17-rc3, going
all the way back to 3.10 would be a lot of work. If there's anyone that
cares about bcache on stable kernels (and actually use it), now would
On 05/09/14 15:17, Jens Axboe wrote:
(from oldest to newest). And that's just from 3.16 to 3.17-rc3, going
all the way back to 3.10 would be a lot of work. If there's anyone that
cares about bcache on stable kernels (and actually use it), now would be
a good time to pipe up.
Just "piping up"
On 09/05/2014 04:17 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>
> We need to do something about this. From this latest pull, looks like
> all should go to stable:
>
> 5b1016e62f74c53e0330403025954c8d95384c03
> 9aa61a992acceeec0d1de2cd99938421498659d5
> dbd810ab678d262d3772d29b65844d7b20dc47bc
>
On 09/05/2014 08:28 AM, Vasiliy Tolstov wrote:
> 2014-09-05 18:17 GMT+04:00 Jens Axboe :
>>
>> We need to do something about this. From this latest pull, looks like
>> all should go to stable:
>>
>> 5b1016e62f74c53e0330403025954c8d95384c03
>> 9aa61a992acceeec0d1de2cd99938421498659d5
>>
2014-09-05 18:17 GMT+04:00 Jens Axboe :
>
> We need to do something about this. From this latest pull, looks like
> all should go to stable:
>
> 5b1016e62f74c53e0330403025954c8d95384c03
> 9aa61a992acceeec0d1de2cd99938421498659d5
> dbd810ab678d262d3772d29b65844d7b20dc47bc
>
On 09/05/2014 01:31 AM, Francis Moreau wrote:
> On 08/10/2014 09:54 AM, Peter Kieser wrote:
>>
>> On 2014-08-05 9:58 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> On 08/04/2014 10:33 PM, Kent Overstreet wrote:
Hey Jens, here's the pull request for 3.17 - typically late, but lots of
tasty
fixes in this
On 08/10/2014 09:54 AM, Peter Kieser wrote:
>
> On 2014-08-05 9:58 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 08/04/2014 10:33 PM, Kent Overstreet wrote:
>>> Hey Jens, here's the pull request for 3.17 - typically late, but lots of
>>> tasty
>>> fixes in this one :)
>> Normally I'd say no, but since it's
On 08/10/2014 09:54 AM, Peter Kieser wrote:
On 2014-08-05 9:58 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 08/04/2014 10:33 PM, Kent Overstreet wrote:
Hey Jens, here's the pull request for 3.17 - typically late, but lots of
tasty
fixes in this one :)
Normally I'd say no, but since it's basically just fixes,
On 09/05/2014 01:31 AM, Francis Moreau wrote:
On 08/10/2014 09:54 AM, Peter Kieser wrote:
On 2014-08-05 9:58 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 08/04/2014 10:33 PM, Kent Overstreet wrote:
Hey Jens, here's the pull request for 3.17 - typically late, but lots of
tasty
fixes in this one :)
Normally
2014-09-05 18:17 GMT+04:00 Jens Axboe ax...@kernel.dk:
We need to do something about this. From this latest pull, looks like
all should go to stable:
5b1016e62f74c53e0330403025954c8d95384c03
9aa61a992acceeec0d1de2cd99938421498659d5
dbd810ab678d262d3772d29b65844d7b20dc47bc
On 09/05/2014 08:28 AM, Vasiliy Tolstov wrote:
2014-09-05 18:17 GMT+04:00 Jens Axboe ax...@kernel.dk:
We need to do something about this. From this latest pull, looks like
all should go to stable:
5b1016e62f74c53e0330403025954c8d95384c03
9aa61a992acceeec0d1de2cd99938421498659d5
On 09/05/2014 04:17 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
We need to do something about this. From this latest pull, looks like
all should go to stable:
5b1016e62f74c53e0330403025954c8d95384c03
9aa61a992acceeec0d1de2cd99938421498659d5
dbd810ab678d262d3772d29b65844d7b20dc47bc
On 05/09/14 15:17, Jens Axboe wrote:
(from oldest to newest). And that's just from 3.16 to 3.17-rc3, going
all the way back to 3.10 would be a lot of work. If there's anyone that
cares about bcache on stable kernels (and actually use it), now would be
a good time to pipe up.
Just piping up as
On 2014-09-05 8:37 AM, Eddie Chapman wrote:
On 05/09/14 15:17, Jens Axboe wrote:
(from oldest to newest). And that's just from 3.16 to 3.17-rc3, going
all the way back to 3.10 would be a lot of work. If there's anyone that
cares about bcache on stable kernels (and actually use it), now would
On 09/05/2014 11:03 AM, Arne Wiebalck wrote:
On Sep 5, 2014, at 6:41 PM, Peter Kieser pe...@kieser.ca
wrote:
On 2014-09-05 8:37 AM, Eddie Chapman wrote:
On 05/09/14 15:17, Jens Axboe wrote:
(from oldest to newest). And that's just from 3.16 to 3.17-rc3, going
all the way back to 3.10
On Sep 5, 2014, at 6:41 PM, Peter Kieser pe...@kieser.ca
wrote:
On 2014-09-05 8:37 AM, Eddie Chapman wrote:
On 05/09/14 15:17, Jens Axboe wrote:
(from oldest to newest). And that's just from 3.16 to 3.17-rc3, going
all the way back to 3.10 would be a lot of work. If there's anyone that
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 11:10:13AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 09/05/2014 11:03 AM, Arne Wiebalck wrote:
On Sep 5, 2014, at 6:41 PM, Peter Kieser pe...@kieser.ca
wrote:
On 2014-09-05 8:37 AM, Eddie Chapman wrote:
On 05/09/14 15:17, Jens Axboe wrote:
(from oldest to newest). And
Am 05.09.2014 20:33, schrieb Kent Overstreet:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 11:10:13AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 09/05/2014 11:03 AM, Arne Wiebalck wrote:
On Sep 5, 2014, at 6:41 PM, Peter Kieser pe...@kieser.ca
wrote:
On 2014-09-05 8:37 AM, Eddie Chapman wrote:
On 05/09/14 15:17, Jens
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 09:31:06AM +0200, Francis Moreau wrote:
On 08/10/2014 09:54 AM, Peter Kieser wrote:
On 2014-08-05 9:58 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 08/04/2014 10:33 PM, Kent Overstreet wrote:
Hey Jens, here's the pull request for 3.17 - typically late, but lots of
tasty
fixes in
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 04:44:13PM +0200, Francis Moreau wrote:
On 09/05/2014 04:17 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
We need to do something about this. From this latest pull, looks like
all should go to stable:
5b1016e62f74c53e0330403025954c8d95384c03
9aa61a992acceeec0d1de2cd99938421498659d5
On 09/05/2014 03:45 PM, Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 09:31:06AM +0200, Francis Moreau wrote:
On 08/10/2014 09:54 AM, Peter Kieser wrote:
On 2014-08-05 9:58 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 08/04/2014 10:33 PM, Kent Overstreet wrote:
Hey Jens, here's the pull request for 3.17 - typically
On 2014-09-05 2:45 PM, Greg KH wrote:
Just because a maintainer/developer doesn't want to do anything for the
stable kernel releases does_NOT_ mean the code is
unstable/expreimental at all.
These are more bcache-ate-my-data unstable bugs. It's standard practice
to backport fixes that cause
On Fri, 5 Sep 2014 17:03:57 +
Arne Wiebalck arne.wieba...@cern.ch wrote:
On Sep 5, 2014, at 6:41 PM, Peter Kieser pe...@kieser.ca
wrote:
On 2014-09-05 8:37 AM, Eddie Chapman wrote:
On 05/09/14 15:17, Jens Axboe wrote:
(from oldest to newest). And that's just from 3.16 to
On 2014-08-05 9:58 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 08/04/2014 10:33 PM, Kent Overstreet wrote:
Hey Jens, here's the pull request for 3.17 - typically late, but lots of tasty
fixes in this one :)
Normally I'd say no, but since it's basically just fixes, I guess we can
pull it in. But generally, it
On 2014-08-05 9:58 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 08/04/2014 10:33 PM, Kent Overstreet wrote:
Hey Jens, here's the pull request for 3.17 - typically late, but lots of tasty
fixes in this one :)
Normally I'd say no, but since it's basically just fixes, I guess we can
pull it in. But generally, it
On 08/04/2014 10:33 PM, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> Hey Jens, here's the pull request for 3.17 - typically late, but lots of tasty
> fixes in this one :)
Normally I'd say no, but since it's basically just fixes, I guess we can
pull it in. But generally, it has to be in my hands a week before this,
On 08/04/2014 10:33 PM, Kent Overstreet wrote:
Hey Jens, here's the pull request for 3.17 - typically late, but lots of tasty
fixes in this one :)
Normally I'd say no, but since it's basically just fixes, I guess we can
pull it in. But generally, it has to be in my hands a week before this,
so
Hey Jens, here's the pull request for 3.17 - typically late, but lots of tasty
fixes in this one :)
The following changes since commit 4c834452aad01531db949414f94f817a86348d59:
Linux 3.16-rc3 (2014-06-29 14:11:36 -0700)
are available in the git repository at:
Hey Jens, here's the pull request for 3.17 - typically late, but lots of tasty
fixes in this one :)
The following changes since commit 4c834452aad01531db949414f94f817a86348d59:
Linux 3.16-rc3 (2014-06-29 14:11:36 -0700)
are available in the git repository at:
46 matches
Mail list logo
