Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [GIT PULL] code of conduct fixes for 4.19-rc8

2018-10-23 Thread James Bottomley
On Mon, 2018-10-22 at 22:10 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 01:15:14PM -0700, James Bottomley wrote: > > This is the series of patches which has been discussed on both > > ksummit-discuss and linux-kernel for the past few weeks. As Shuah > > said when kicking off the

Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [GIT PULL] code of conduct fixes for 4.19-rc8

2018-10-23 Thread James Bottomley
On Mon, 2018-10-22 at 22:10 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 01:15:14PM -0700, James Bottomley wrote: > > This is the series of patches which has been discussed on both > > ksummit-discuss and linux-kernel for the past few weeks. As Shuah > > said when kicking off the

Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [GIT PULL] code of conduct fixes for 4.19-rc8

2018-10-23 Thread Mark Brown
On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 08:07:50AM +0100, Josh Triplett wrote: > On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 09:16:20PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > As James Bottomley has suggested multiple times, > > I'd much rather kernel development use the debian > > code of conduct verbatim than even this modified one. > >

Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [GIT PULL] code of conduct fixes for 4.19-rc8

2018-10-23 Thread Mark Brown
On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 08:07:50AM +0100, Josh Triplett wrote: > On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 09:16:20PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > As James Bottomley has suggested multiple times, > > I'd much rather kernel development use the debian > > code of conduct verbatim than even this modified one. > >

Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [GIT PULL] code of conduct fixes for 4.19-rc8

2018-10-23 Thread Josh Triplett
On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 09:16:20PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > On Mon, 2018-10-22 at 22:10 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 01:15:14PM -0700, James Bottomley wrote: > > > This is the series of patches which has been discussed on both ksummit- > > > discuss and

Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [GIT PULL] code of conduct fixes for 4.19-rc8

2018-10-23 Thread Josh Triplett
On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 09:16:20PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > On Mon, 2018-10-22 at 22:10 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 01:15:14PM -0700, James Bottomley wrote: > > > This is the series of patches which has been discussed on both ksummit- > > > discuss and

Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [GIT PULL] code of conduct fixes for 4.19-rc8

2018-10-23 Thread Joe Perches
On Mon, 2018-10-22 at 23:05 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 10/22/18 9:16 PM, Joe Perches wrote: > > As James Bottomley has suggested multiple times, > > I'd much rather kernel development use the debian > > code of conduct verbatim than even this modified one. > > > >

Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [GIT PULL] code of conduct fixes for 4.19-rc8

2018-10-23 Thread Joe Perches
On Mon, 2018-10-22 at 23:05 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 10/22/18 9:16 PM, Joe Perches wrote: > > As James Bottomley has suggested multiple times, > > I'd much rather kernel development use the debian > > code of conduct verbatim than even this modified one. > > > >

Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [GIT PULL] code of conduct fixes for 4.19-rc8

2018-10-23 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 10/22/18 9:16 PM, Joe Perches wrote: > On Mon, 2018-10-22 at 22:10 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >> On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 01:15:14PM -0700, James Bottomley wrote: >>> This is the series of patches which has been discussed on both ksummit- >>> discuss and linux-kernel for the past few

Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [GIT PULL] code of conduct fixes for 4.19-rc8

2018-10-23 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 10/22/18 9:16 PM, Joe Perches wrote: > On Mon, 2018-10-22 at 22:10 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >> On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 01:15:14PM -0700, James Bottomley wrote: >>> This is the series of patches which has been discussed on both ksummit- >>> discuss and linux-kernel for the past few

Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [GIT PULL] code of conduct fixes for 4.19-rc8

2018-10-22 Thread Joe Perches
On Mon, 2018-10-22 at 22:10 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 01:15:14PM -0700, James Bottomley wrote: > > This is the series of patches which has been discussed on both ksummit- > > discuss and linux-kernel for the past few weeks. As Shuah said when > > kicking off the

Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [GIT PULL] code of conduct fixes for 4.19-rc8

2018-10-22 Thread Joe Perches
On Mon, 2018-10-22 at 22:10 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 01:15:14PM -0700, James Bottomley wrote: > > This is the series of patches which has been discussed on both ksummit- > > discuss and linux-kernel for the past few weeks. As Shuah said when > > kicking off the

Re: [GIT PULL] code of conduct fixes for 4.19-rc8

2018-10-22 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 01:15:14PM -0700, James Bottomley wrote: > This is the series of patches which has been discussed on both ksummit- > discuss and linux-kernel for the past few weeks. As Shuah said when > kicking off the process, it's designed as a starting point for the next > phase of the

Re: [GIT PULL] code of conduct fixes for 4.19-rc8

2018-10-22 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 01:15:14PM -0700, James Bottomley wrote: > This is the series of patches which has been discussed on both ksummit- > discuss and linux-kernel for the past few weeks. As Shuah said when > kicking off the process, it's designed as a starting point for the next > phase of the

[GIT PULL] code of conduct fixes for 4.19-rc8

2018-10-20 Thread James Bottomley
This is the series of patches which has been discussed on both ksummit- discuss and linux-kernel for the past few weeks. As Shuah said when kicking off the process, it's designed as a starting point for the next phase of the discussion, not as the end point, so it's only really a set of minor

[GIT PULL] code of conduct fixes for 4.19-rc8

2018-10-20 Thread James Bottomley
This is the series of patches which has been discussed on both ksummit- discuss and linux-kernel for the past few weeks. As Shuah said when kicking off the process, it's designed as a starting point for the next phase of the discussion, not as the end point, so it's only really a set of minor