Yes, I would love to get visws and numaq killed off, too.
On February 12, 2014 4:50:26 AM PST, Andi Kleen wrote:
>> This is the removal of Summit and ES7000 subarchitectures from x86.
>I'd
>> like to do the same for NumaQ, but am still researching if we can
>really
>> do away with it.
>
> This is the removal of Summit and ES7000 subarchitectures from x86. I'd
> like to do the same for NumaQ, but am still researching if we can really
> do away with it.
Nice!
How about VISWS?
Please also check if some arch abstracion innline wrappers are not needed
anymore.
I suspect
Running tests on this branch, will push it into tip tomorrow if ok.
On February 11, 2014 11:06:45 PM PST, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
>* H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>
>> On 02/11/2014 06:53 PM, David Rientjes wrote:
>> > Hi Ingo, Peter, and Thomas,
>> >
>> > [ Be aware of bouncing emails on the cc, it
Running tests on this branch, will push it into tip tomorrow if ok.
On February 11, 2014 11:06:45 PM PST, Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote:
* H. Peter Anvin h...@zytor.com wrote:
On 02/11/2014 06:53 PM, David Rientjes wrote:
Hi Ingo, Peter, and Thomas,
[ Be aware of bouncing emails
This is the removal of Summit and ES7000 subarchitectures from x86. I'd
like to do the same for NumaQ, but am still researching if we can really
do away with it.
Nice!
How about VISWS?
Please also check if some arch abstracion innline wrappers are not needed
anymore.
I suspect removing
Yes, I would love to get visws and numaq killed off, too.
On February 12, 2014 4:50:26 AM PST, Andi Kleen a...@firstfloor.org wrote:
This is the removal of Summit and ES7000 subarchitectures from x86.
I'd
like to do the same for NumaQ, but am still researching if we can
really
do away with
* H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 02/11/2014 06:53 PM, David Rientjes wrote:
> > Hi Ingo, Peter, and Thomas,
> >
> > [ Be aware of bouncing emails on the cc, it includes the last-known email
> >addresses of the authors of these subarchitectures and may bounce. ]
> >
> > If you agree, please
On Tue, 11 Feb 2014, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Nice.
>
Natalie emailed me and said she agrees with the removal of es7000.
Matthew's email address bounces, so summit is orphaned and the email
address in its header is obsolete.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
On 02/11/2014 06:53 PM, David Rientjes wrote:
> Hi Ingo, Peter, and Thomas,
>
> [ Be aware of bouncing emails on the cc, it includes the last-known email
>addresses of the authors of these subarchitectures and may bounce. ]
>
> If you agree, please pull from:
>
>
Hi Ingo, Peter, and Thomas,
[ Be aware of bouncing emails on the cc, it includes the last-known email
addresses of the authors of these subarchitectures and may bounce. ]
If you agree, please pull from:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rientjes/linux.git x86/apic
# HEAD:
Hi Ingo, Peter, and Thomas,
[ Be aware of bouncing emails on the cc, it includes the last-known email
addresses of the authors of these subarchitectures and may bounce. ]
If you agree, please pull from:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rientjes/linux.git x86/apic
# HEAD:
On 02/11/2014 06:53 PM, David Rientjes wrote:
Hi Ingo, Peter, and Thomas,
[ Be aware of bouncing emails on the cc, it includes the last-known email
addresses of the authors of these subarchitectures and may bounce. ]
If you agree, please pull from:
On Tue, 11 Feb 2014, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Nice.
Natalie emailed me and said she agrees with the removal of es7000.
Matthew's email address bounces, so summit is orphaned and the email
address in its header is obsolete.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
* H. Peter Anvin h...@zytor.com wrote:
On 02/11/2014 06:53 PM, David Rientjes wrote:
Hi Ingo, Peter, and Thomas,
[ Be aware of bouncing emails on the cc, it includes the last-known email
addresses of the authors of these subarchitectures and may bounce. ]
If you agree, please
14 matches
Mail list logo
