On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 01:22:52PM -0400, Shaya Potter wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> >On Mon, 9 Apr 2007 10:53:51 -0400 "Josef 'Jeff' Sipek"
> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>The following patches introduce new branch-management code into Unionfs as
> >>well as fix a number of stability
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 9 Apr 2007 10:53:51 -0400 "Josef 'Jeff' Sipek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
The following patches introduce new branch-management code into Unionfs as
well as fix a number of stability issues and resource leaks.
I have a mental note that unionfs is in the "stuck"
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 9 Apr 2007 10:53:51 -0400 Josef 'Jeff' Sipek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The following patches introduce new branch-management code into Unionfs as
well as fix a number of stability issues and resource leaks.
I have a mental note that unionfs is in the stuck
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 01:22:52PM -0400, Shaya Potter wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 9 Apr 2007 10:53:51 -0400 Josef 'Jeff' Sipek
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The following patches introduce new branch-management code into Unionfs as
well as fix a number of stability issues and resource
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 10:49:48AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Apr 2007 10:53:51 -0400 "Josef 'Jeff' Sipek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > The following patches introduce new branch-management code into Unionfs as
> > well as fix a number of stability issues and resource leaks.
On Apr 9 2007 10:53, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
>
>The following patches introduce new branch-management code into Unionfs as
>well as fix a number of stability issues and resource leaks. For detailed
>announcement, see end of this email.
I have to seriously ask: why don't we consider aufs?
On Mon, 9 Apr 2007 10:53:51 -0400 "Josef 'Jeff' Sipek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> The following patches introduce new branch-management code into Unionfs as
> well as fix a number of stability issues and resource leaks.
I have a mental note that unionfs is in the "stuck" state, due to
The following patches introduce new branch-management code into Unionfs as
well as fix a number of stability issues and resource leaks. For detailed
announcement, see end of this email.
As before, there is a git repo at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jsipek/unionfs.git
The following patches introduce new branch-management code into Unionfs as
well as fix a number of stability issues and resource leaks. For detailed
announcement, see end of this email.
As before, there is a git repo at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jsipek/unionfs.git
On Mon, 9 Apr 2007 10:53:51 -0400 Josef 'Jeff' Sipek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The following patches introduce new branch-management code into Unionfs as
well as fix a number of stability issues and resource leaks.
I have a mental note that unionfs is in the stuck state, due to general
On Apr 9 2007 10:53, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
The following patches introduce new branch-management code into Unionfs as
well as fix a number of stability issues and resource leaks. For detailed
announcement, see end of this email.
I have to seriously ask: why don't we consider aufs? Without
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 10:49:48AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 9 Apr 2007 10:53:51 -0400 Josef 'Jeff' Sipek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The following patches introduce new branch-management code into Unionfs as
well as fix a number of stability issues and resource leaks.
First, a
12 matches
Mail list logo
