> From: Javier Gonzalez [mailto:jav...@cnexlabs.com]
> This case cannot occur on the only user of the function
> (pblk_recov_l2p()). On the previous check (pblk_line_was_written()), we
> verify the state of the line and the position of the first good chunk. In
> the case of a bad line (less chunks
> From: Javier Gonzalez [mailto:jav...@cnexlabs.com]
> This case cannot occur on the only user of the function
> (pblk_recov_l2p()). On the previous check (pblk_line_was_written()), we
> verify the state of the line and the position of the first good chunk. In
> the case of a bad line (less chunks
> On 28 May 2018, at 10.58, Matias Bjørling wrote:
>
> From: Igor Konopko
>
> When all the blocks (chunks) in line are marked as bad (offline)
> we shouldn't try to read smeta during init process.
>
> Currently we are trying to do so by passing -1
> On 28 May 2018, at 10.58, Matias Bjørling wrote:
>
> From: Igor Konopko
>
> When all the blocks (chunks) in line are marked as bad (offline)
> we shouldn't try to read smeta during init process.
>
> Currently we are trying to do so by passing -1 as PPA address,
> what causes multiple
From: Igor Konopko
When all the blocks (chunks) in line are marked as bad (offline)
we shouldn't try to read smeta during init process.
Currently we are trying to do so by passing -1 as PPA address,
what causes multiple warnings, that we issuing IOs to out-of-bound
From: Igor Konopko
When all the blocks (chunks) in line are marked as bad (offline)
we shouldn't try to read smeta during init process.
Currently we are trying to do so by passing -1 as PPA address,
what causes multiple warnings, that we issuing IOs to out-of-bound
PPAs.
Signed-off-by: Igor
6 matches
Mail list logo