Re: [GIT PULL 20/20] lightnvm: pblk: sync RB and RL states during GC

2018-05-28 Thread Javier Gonzalez
Javier I somehow missed these patches in the mailing list. Sorry for coming with feedback this late. I'll look at my filters - in any case, would you mind Cc'ing me in the future? > On 28 May 2018, at 10.58, Matias Bjørling wrote: > > From: Igor Konopko

Re: [GIT PULL 20/20] lightnvm: pblk: sync RB and RL states during GC

2018-05-28 Thread Javier Gonzalez
Javier I somehow missed these patches in the mailing list. Sorry for coming with feedback this late. I'll look at my filters - in any case, would you mind Cc'ing me in the future? > On 28 May 2018, at 10.58, Matias Bjørling wrote: > > From: Igor Konopko > > During sequential workloads we can

[GIT PULL 20/20] lightnvm: pblk: sync RB and RL states during GC

2018-05-28 Thread Matias Bjørling
From: Igor Konopko During sequential workloads we can met the case when almost all the lines are fully written with data. In that case rate limiter will significantly reduce the max number of requests for user IOs. Unfortunately in the case when round buffer is flushed

[GIT PULL 20/20] lightnvm: pblk: sync RB and RL states during GC

2018-05-28 Thread Matias Bjørling
From: Igor Konopko During sequential workloads we can met the case when almost all the lines are fully written with data. In that case rate limiter will significantly reduce the max number of requests for user IOs. Unfortunately in the case when round buffer is flushed to drive and the entries