Re: [GIT PULL rcu/next] One more RCU commit for 3.20

* Paul E. McKenney wrote: > Hello, Ingo, > > One more change that I should have included in my last pull, namely a > change that prevents a splat seen by Sasha Levin. This commit passes > testing (including of course Sasha's), has been exposed to both -next > and 0day testing, and is quite

Re: [GIT PULL rcu/next] One more RCU commit for 3.20

* Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: Hello, Ingo, One more change that I should have included in my last pull, namely a change that prevents a splat seen by Sasha Levin. This commit passes testing (including of course Sasha's), has been exposed to both -next and 0day

[GIT PULL rcu/next] One more RCU commit for 3.20

Hello, Ingo, One more change that I should have included in my last pull, namely a change that prevents a splat seen by Sasha Levin. This commit passes testing (including of course Sasha's), has been exposed to both -next and 0day testing, and is quite small. This change is available in the git

[GIT PULL rcu/next] One more RCU commit for 3.20

Hello, Ingo, One more change that I should have included in my last pull, namely a change that prevents a splat seen by Sasha Levin. This commit passes testing (including of course Sasha's), has been exposed to both -next and 0day testing, and is quite small. This change is available in the git