On Tue, Sep 27, 2016, at 14:52, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> >> * Is it still correct nowadays that the function "gigaset_initcs" did not
> >> call the function "kfree" after a later function call failed?
> >
> > Yes, if it is handled in another place, Paul already did show you the place.
>
> To
>> * Is it still correct nowadays that the function "gigaset_initcs" did not
>> call the function "kfree" after a later function call failed?
>
> Yes, if it is handled in another place, Paul already did show you the place.
To which source code place do you refer here?
>> * Do you expect that
Am 27.09.2016 um 13:32 schrieb SF Markus Elfring:
>>> I got the impression that the exception handling was incomplete in the
>>> implementation of the function "gigaset_initcs".
>>
>> That impression is wrong. Careful reading of the code will confirm that.
>
> * Is it still correct nowadays that
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016, at 13:32, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> >> I got the impression that the exception handling was incomplete in the
> >> implementation of the function "gigaset_initcs".
> >
> > That impression is wrong. Careful reading of the code will confirm that.
>
> * Is it still correct no
>> I got the impression that the exception handling was incomplete in the
>> implementation of the function "gigaset_initcs".
>
> That impression is wrong. Careful reading of the code will confirm that.
* Is it still correct nowadays that the function "gigaset_initcs" did not
call the function
Hi,
as longtime maintainer of the code in question I feel compelled to chime
in at this point.
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016, at 11:34, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> >> Will it matter here if the function "kfree" will be called for the
> >> data structure members "bcs" and "inbuf" after a later function call
6 matches
Mail list logo
