On Thursday, August 01, 2013 12:16:40 PM Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 12:09 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > A single SOB tag usually means that the committer himself is the author of
> > the change set and I don't see why this should be regarded as a bad thing in
> > princi
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 12:09 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> A single SOB tag usually means that the committer himself is the author of
> the change set and I don't see why this should be regarded as a bad thing in
> principle. Yes, it is technically possible for maintainers to "cheat", for
> exa
On Tuesday, July 30, 2013 10:47:31 PM H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 07/29/2013 03:30 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Monday, July 29, 2013 02:17:34 PM John W. Linville wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 03:27:44PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >>
> >>> That said we have the same issue with co
On Tue, 2013-07-30 at 22:47 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 07/29/2013 03:30 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Monday, July 29, 2013 02:17:34 PM John W. Linville wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 03:27:44PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >>
> >>> That said we have the same issue with commi
On 07/29/2013 03:30 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, July 29, 2013 02:17:34 PM John W. Linville wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 03:27:44PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>
>>> That said we have the same issue with commits with just two SOB tags if
>>> a maintainer applies a patch that
On Monday, July 29, 2013 02:17:34 PM John W. Linville wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 03:27:44PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > That said we have the same issue with commits with just two SOB tags if
> > a maintainer applies a patch that nobody has responded to. Are they going
> > to
> >
On Monday, July 29, 2013 08:11:41 AM Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jul 2013 15:10:33 +0200
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" wrote:
>
> > That actually is simple enough.
> >
> > Check out the Linus' master branch and do
> >
> > $ git log --ancestry-path --merges ..
>
> So I picked a recent, single-s
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 02:17:34PM -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 03:27:44PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > That said we have the same issue with commits with just two SOB tags if
> > a maintainer applies a patch that nobody has responded to. Are they going
> > t
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 03:27:44PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> That said we have the same issue with commits with just two SOB tags if
> a maintainer applies a patch that nobody has responded to. Are they going to
> be regarded as "suspicious" too now?
>
> And what about trusting maintaine
On Mon, 29 Jul 2013, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> >> That actually is simple enough.
> >>
> >> Check out the Linus' master branch and do
> >>
> >> $ git log --ancestry-path --merges ..
> >
> > So I picked a recent, single-signoff patch mostly at random:
> >
> > 8ade62857ef77bdf639185410fbcd811aa7
On 13-07-29 10:11 AM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jul 2013 15:10:33 +0200
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" wrote:
>
>> That actually is simple enough.
>>
>> Check out the Linus' master branch and do
>>
>> $ git log --ancestry-path --merges ..
>
> So I picked a recent, single-signoff patch mostly at
On Mon, 29 Jul 2013 15:10:33 +0200
"Rafael J. Wysocki" wrote:
> That actually is simple enough.
>
> Check out the Linus' master branch and do
>
> $ git log --ancestry-path --merges ..
So I picked a recent, single-signoff patch mostly at random:
8ade62857ef77bdf639185410fbcd811aa700cb2
On Monday, July 29, 2013 09:03:57 AM Jason Cooper wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 01:35:26PM +0200, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 06:40:32AM -0400, Jason Cooper wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 12:31:37PM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 29 Jul 2013, Samuel Ortiz wro
On Monday, July 29, 2013 12:31:37 PM Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jul 2013, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
>
> > - Developement process: Jon Corbet's article about our changelog raised
> > one interesting question: How can we better track how single SOB
> > patches are getting merged ?
That actually
14 matches
Mail list logo