On 22.01.19 21:17, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> So lattely i have been looking at page flags and we are using 6 flags
> for memory reclaim and compaction:
>
> PG_referenced
> PG_lru
> PG_active
> PG_workingset
> PG_reclaim
> PG_unevictable
>
> On top of which you can add the
On 1/22/19 12:17 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> So lattely i have been looking at page flags and we are using 6 flags
> for memory reclaim and compaction:
>
> PG_referenced
> PG_lru
> PG_active
> PG_workingset
> PG_reclaim
> PG_unevictable
>
> On top of which you can add the
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 01:44:15PM -0800, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Jerome Glisse writes:
> >
> > Right now this is more a temptative ie i do not know if i will succeed,
> > in any case i can report on failure or success and discuss my finding to
> > get people opinions on the matter.
>
> I would just
Jerome Glisse writes:
>
> Right now this is more a temptative ie i do not know if i will succeed,
> in any case i can report on failure or success and discuss my finding to
> get people opinions on the matter.
I would just stop putting node/zone number into the flags. These
could be all handled
So lattely i have been looking at page flags and we are using 6 flags
for memory reclaim and compaction:
PG_referenced
PG_lru
PG_active
PG_workingset
PG_reclaim
PG_unevictable
On top of which you can add the page anonymous flag (anonymous or
share memory)
PG_anon //
5 matches
Mail list logo