On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 07:04:28PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 09:32:13AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 6:26 AM Cyril Hrubis wrote:
> > >
> > > This looks like mkfs.vfat got EBUSY after the loop device was
> > > succesfully umounted.
> >
> > Hmm.
On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 09:32:13AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 6:26 AM Cyril Hrubis wrote:
> >
> > This looks like mkfs.vfat got EBUSY after the loop device was
> > succesfully umounted.
>
> Hmm. Smells like the RCU-delaying got triggered again.
>
> We have that
On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 6:26 AM Cyril Hrubis wrote:
>
> This looks like mkfs.vfat got EBUSY after the loop device was
> succesfully umounted.
Hmm. Smells like the RCU-delaying got triggered again.
We have that "synchronize_rcu_expedited()" in namespace_unlock(),
which is so that everything
Hi!
> tst_test.c:1161: INFO: Testing on vfat
> tst_mkfs.c:90: INFO: Formatting /dev/loop0 with vfat opts='' extra opts=''
> mkfs.vfat: unable to open /dev/loop0: Device or resource busy
> tst_mkfs.c:101: BROK: mkfs.vfat:1: tst_test.c failed with 741
This looks like mkfs.vfat got EBUSY after the
4 matches
Mail list logo