On 09/10/2015 06:14 AM, Graeme Gregory wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 03:09:47PM -0600, Al Stone wrote:
>> The existing BAD_MADT_ENTRY macro only checks that the size of the data
>> structure for an MADT subtable matches the length entry in the subtable.
>> This is, unfortunately, not reliable.
On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 03:09:47PM -0600, Al Stone wrote:
> The existing BAD_MADT_ENTRY macro only checks that the size of the data
> structure for an MADT subtable matches the length entry in the subtable.
> This is, unfortunately, not reliable. Nor, as it turns out, does it have
> anything to
On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 03:09:47PM -0600, Al Stone wrote:
> The existing BAD_MADT_ENTRY macro only checks that the size of the data
> structure for an MADT subtable matches the length entry in the subtable.
> This is, unfortunately, not reliable. Nor, as it turns out, does it have
> anything to
On 09/10/2015 06:14 AM, Graeme Gregory wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 03:09:47PM -0600, Al Stone wrote:
>> The existing BAD_MADT_ENTRY macro only checks that the size of the data
>> structure for an MADT subtable matches the length entry in the subtable.
>> This is, unfortunately, not reliable.
4 matches
Mail list logo