On 10/14/2015 03:25 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, October 14, 2015 02:20:51 PM Al Stone wrote:
>> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
>> --020400080004050109020606
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>>
>> On 10/12/2015
On Wednesday, October 14, 2015 02:20:51 PM Al Stone wrote:
> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
> --020400080004050109020606
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> On 10/12/2015 10:06 PM, Pat Erley wrote:
> > On 10/12/2015 01:52 PM,
On 10/12/2015 10:06 PM, Pat Erley wrote:
> On 10/12/2015 01:52 PM, Al Stone wrote:
>> On 10/11/2015 09:58 PM, Pat Erley wrote:
>>> On 10/11/2015 08:49 PM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
On 10/12/2015 11:08 AM, Pat Erley wrote:
> On 10/05/2015 10:12 AM, Al Stone wrote:
>> On 10/05/2015 07:39 AM,
On 10/12/2015 10:06 PM, Pat Erley wrote:
> On 10/12/2015 01:52 PM, Al Stone wrote:
>> On 10/11/2015 09:58 PM, Pat Erley wrote:
>>> On 10/11/2015 08:49 PM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
On 10/12/2015 11:08 AM, Pat Erley wrote:
> On 10/05/2015 10:12 AM, Al Stone wrote:
>> On 10/05/2015 07:39 AM,
On 10/14/2015 03:25 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, October 14, 2015 02:20:51 PM Al Stone wrote:
>> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
>> --020400080004050109020606
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>>
>> On 10/12/2015
On Wednesday, October 14, 2015 02:20:51 PM Al Stone wrote:
> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
> --020400080004050109020606
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> On 10/12/2015 10:06 PM, Pat Erley wrote:
> > On 10/12/2015 01:52 PM,
On 12/10/15 20:25, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, October 12, 2015 10:44:52 AM Sudeep Holla wrote:
[...]
Instead of just removing the check completely on x86, IMO restrict
it to some newer/later version of ACPI so you can still force
vendors to fix their ACPI tables at-least in
On 12/10/15 20:25, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, October 12, 2015 10:44:52 AM Sudeep Holla wrote:
[...]
Instead of just removing the check completely on x86, IMO restrict
it to some newer/later version of ACPI so you can still force
vendors to fix their ACPI tables at-least in
On 10/12/2015 01:52 PM, Al Stone wrote:
On 10/11/2015 09:58 PM, Pat Erley wrote:
On 10/11/2015 08:49 PM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
On 10/12/2015 11:08 AM, Pat Erley wrote:
On 10/05/2015 10:12 AM, Al Stone wrote:
On 10/05/2015 07:39 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wednesday, September 30, 2015
On 10/13/2015 03:21 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, October 12, 2015 03:04:30 PM Hanjun Guo wrote:
On 10/12/2015 11:58 AM, Pat Erley wrote:
On 10/11/2015 08:49 PM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
On 10/12/2015 11:08 AM, Pat Erley wrote:
On 10/05/2015 10:12 AM, Al Stone wrote:
On 10/05/2015 07:39
On 10/11/2015 09:58 PM, Pat Erley wrote:
> On 10/11/2015 08:49 PM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> On 10/12/2015 11:08 AM, Pat Erley wrote:
>>> On 10/05/2015 10:12 AM, Al Stone wrote:
On 10/05/2015 07:39 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 30, 2015 10:10:16 AM Al Stone wrote:
On 10/12/2015 01:25 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, October 12, 2015 10:44:52 AM Sudeep Holla wrote:
>>
>> On 12/10/15 08:04, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>>> On 10/12/2015 11:58 AM, Pat Erley wrote:
On 10/11/2015 08:49 PM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> On 10/12/2015 11:08 AM, Pat Erley wrote:
On Monday, October 12, 2015 03:04:30 PM Hanjun Guo wrote:
> On 10/12/2015 11:58 AM, Pat Erley wrote:
> > On 10/11/2015 08:49 PM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> >> On 10/12/2015 11:08 AM, Pat Erley wrote:
> >>> On 10/05/2015 10:12 AM, Al Stone wrote:
> On 10/05/2015 07:39 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
On Monday, October 12, 2015 10:44:52 AM Sudeep Holla wrote:
>
> On 12/10/15 08:04, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> > On 10/12/2015 11:58 AM, Pat Erley wrote:
> >> On 10/11/2015 08:49 PM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> >>> On 10/12/2015 11:08 AM, Pat Erley wrote:
> On 10/05/2015 10:12 AM, Al Stone wrote:
> > On
On 10/12/2015 05:44 PM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
On 12/10/15 08:04, Hanjun Guo wrote:
On 10/12/2015 11:58 AM, Pat Erley wrote:
On 10/11/2015 08:49 PM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
On 10/12/2015 11:08 AM, Pat Erley wrote:
On 10/05/2015 10:12 AM, Al Stone wrote:
On 10/05/2015 07:39 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki
On 12/10/15 08:04, Hanjun Guo wrote:
On 10/12/2015 11:58 AM, Pat Erley wrote:
On 10/11/2015 08:49 PM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
On 10/12/2015 11:08 AM, Pat Erley wrote:
On 10/05/2015 10:12 AM, Al Stone wrote:
On 10/05/2015 07:39 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wednesday, September 30, 2015
On 10/12/2015 11:58 AM, Pat Erley wrote:
On 10/11/2015 08:49 PM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
On 10/12/2015 11:08 AM, Pat Erley wrote:
On 10/05/2015 10:12 AM, Al Stone wrote:
On 10/05/2015 07:39 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wednesday, September 30, 2015 10:10:16 AM Al Stone wrote:
On 09/30/2015
On 10/12/2015 11:58 AM, Pat Erley wrote:
On 10/11/2015 08:49 PM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
On 10/12/2015 11:08 AM, Pat Erley wrote:
On 10/05/2015 10:12 AM, Al Stone wrote:
On 10/05/2015 07:39 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wednesday, September 30, 2015 10:10:16 AM Al Stone wrote:
On 09/30/2015
On 12/10/15 08:04, Hanjun Guo wrote:
On 10/12/2015 11:58 AM, Pat Erley wrote:
On 10/11/2015 08:49 PM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
On 10/12/2015 11:08 AM, Pat Erley wrote:
On 10/05/2015 10:12 AM, Al Stone wrote:
On 10/05/2015 07:39 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wednesday, September 30, 2015
On 10/12/2015 05:44 PM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
On 12/10/15 08:04, Hanjun Guo wrote:
On 10/12/2015 11:58 AM, Pat Erley wrote:
On 10/11/2015 08:49 PM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
On 10/12/2015 11:08 AM, Pat Erley wrote:
On 10/05/2015 10:12 AM, Al Stone wrote:
On 10/05/2015 07:39 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, October 12, 2015 10:44:52 AM Sudeep Holla wrote:
>
> On 12/10/15 08:04, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> > On 10/12/2015 11:58 AM, Pat Erley wrote:
> >> On 10/11/2015 08:49 PM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> >>> On 10/12/2015 11:08 AM, Pat Erley wrote:
> On 10/05/2015 10:12 AM, Al Stone wrote:
> > On
On 10/12/2015 01:25 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, October 12, 2015 10:44:52 AM Sudeep Holla wrote:
>>
>> On 12/10/15 08:04, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>>> On 10/12/2015 11:58 AM, Pat Erley wrote:
On 10/11/2015 08:49 PM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> On 10/12/2015 11:08 AM, Pat Erley wrote:
On Monday, October 12, 2015 03:04:30 PM Hanjun Guo wrote:
> On 10/12/2015 11:58 AM, Pat Erley wrote:
> > On 10/11/2015 08:49 PM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> >> On 10/12/2015 11:08 AM, Pat Erley wrote:
> >>> On 10/05/2015 10:12 AM, Al Stone wrote:
> On 10/05/2015 07:39 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
On 10/11/2015 09:58 PM, Pat Erley wrote:
> On 10/11/2015 08:49 PM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> On 10/12/2015 11:08 AM, Pat Erley wrote:
>>> On 10/05/2015 10:12 AM, Al Stone wrote:
On 10/05/2015 07:39 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 30, 2015 10:10:16 AM Al Stone wrote:
On 10/13/2015 03:21 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, October 12, 2015 03:04:30 PM Hanjun Guo wrote:
On 10/12/2015 11:58 AM, Pat Erley wrote:
On 10/11/2015 08:49 PM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
On 10/12/2015 11:08 AM, Pat Erley wrote:
On 10/05/2015 10:12 AM, Al Stone wrote:
On 10/05/2015 07:39
On 10/12/2015 01:52 PM, Al Stone wrote:
On 10/11/2015 09:58 PM, Pat Erley wrote:
On 10/11/2015 08:49 PM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
On 10/12/2015 11:08 AM, Pat Erley wrote:
On 10/05/2015 10:12 AM, Al Stone wrote:
On 10/05/2015 07:39 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wednesday, September 30, 2015
On 10/11/2015 08:49 PM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
On 10/12/2015 11:08 AM, Pat Erley wrote:
On 10/05/2015 10:12 AM, Al Stone wrote:
On 10/05/2015 07:39 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wednesday, September 30, 2015 10:10:16 AM Al Stone wrote:
On 09/30/2015 03:00 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
On 2015/9/30
On 10/12/2015 11:08 AM, Pat Erley wrote:
On 10/05/2015 10:12 AM, Al Stone wrote:
On 10/05/2015 07:39 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wednesday, September 30, 2015 10:10:16 AM Al Stone wrote:
On 09/30/2015 03:00 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
On 2015/9/30 7:45, Al Stone wrote:
NB: this patch set is
On 10/11/2015 08:49 PM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
On 10/12/2015 11:08 AM, Pat Erley wrote:
On 10/05/2015 10:12 AM, Al Stone wrote:
On 10/05/2015 07:39 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wednesday, September 30, 2015 10:10:16 AM Al Stone wrote:
On 09/30/2015 03:00 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
On 2015/9/30
On 10/12/2015 11:08 AM, Pat Erley wrote:
On 10/05/2015 10:12 AM, Al Stone wrote:
On 10/05/2015 07:39 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wednesday, September 30, 2015 10:10:16 AM Al Stone wrote:
On 09/30/2015 03:00 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
On 2015/9/30 7:45, Al Stone wrote:
NB: this patch set is
30 matches
Mail list logo
