Re: [Linaro-acpi] [PATCH v7 00/17] Introduce ACPI for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1

2015-01-17 Thread Rob Herring
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 9:53 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Friday 16 January 2015 15:49:13 Will Deacon wrote: >> >> The on-board ethernet on Seattle requires the driver to program its AXI >> attributes, so configuring it to be a coherent master actually means >> "program the same cacheable AXI

Re: [Linaro-acpi] [PATCH v7 00/17] Introduce ACPI for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1

2015-01-17 Thread Rob Herring
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 9:53 AM, Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de wrote: On Friday 16 January 2015 15:49:13 Will Deacon wrote: The on-board ethernet on Seattle requires the driver to program its AXI attributes, so configuring it to be a coherent master actually means program the same cacheable AXI

Re: [Linaro-acpi] [PATCH v7 00/17] Introduce ACPI for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1

2015-01-16 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Friday 16 January 2015 16:29:44 Grant Likely wrote: > > > Instead, keeping these patches out means that hardware is getting > > > developed and tested against Fedora, early access RHEL and Linaro > > > kernels. It means that we're abdicating on any influence mainline has > > > over how those

Re: [Linaro-acpi] [PATCH v7 00/17] Introduce ACPI for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1

2015-01-16 Thread Suravee Suthikulpanit
On 1/16/15 09:17, Al Stone wrote: On 01/16/2015 03:20 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote: On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 09:31:53PM +, Al Stone wrote: On 01/15/2015 11:23 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote: On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 04:26:20PM +, Grant Likely wrote: On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Hanjun

Re: [Linaro-acpi] [PATCH v7 00/17] Introduce ACPI for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1

2015-01-16 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Friday 16 January 2015 15:49:13 Will Deacon wrote: > > The on-board ethernet on Seattle requires the driver to program its AXI > attributes, so configuring it to be a coherent master actually means > "program the same cacheable AXI settings as you have on the CPU". That > sounds like Linux

Re: [Linaro-acpi] [PATCH v7 00/17] Introduce ACPI for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1

2015-01-16 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Friday 16 January 2015 16:40:28 Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Friday 16 January 2015 15:33:20 Will Deacon wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 03:14:13PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > On Friday 16 January 2015 14:55:45 Will Deacon wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 02:45:30PM +, Tom

Re: [Linaro-acpi] [PATCH v7 00/17] Introduce ACPI for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1

2015-01-16 Thread Al Stone
On 01/16/2015 08:17 AM, Al Stone wrote: > On 01/16/2015 03:20 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 09:31:53PM +, Al Stone wrote: >>> On 01/15/2015 11:23 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote: On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 04:26:20PM +, Grant Likely wrote: > On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at

Re: [Linaro-acpi] [PATCH v7 00/17] Introduce ACPI for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1

2015-01-16 Thread Al Stone
On 01/16/2015 03:20 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote: > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 09:31:53PM +, Al Stone wrote: >> On 01/15/2015 11:23 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote: >>> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 04:26:20PM +, Grant Likely wrote: On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Hanjun Guo wrote: > This is the

Re: [Linaro-acpi] [PATCH v7 00/17] Introduce ACPI for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1

2015-01-16 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Friday 16 January 2015 16:29:44 Grant Likely wrote: Instead, keeping these patches out means that hardware is getting developed and tested against Fedora, early access RHEL and Linaro kernels. It means that we're abdicating on any influence mainline has over how those platforms are

Re: [Linaro-acpi] [PATCH v7 00/17] Introduce ACPI for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1

2015-01-16 Thread Al Stone
On 01/16/2015 03:20 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote: On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 09:31:53PM +, Al Stone wrote: On 01/15/2015 11:23 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote: On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 04:26:20PM +, Grant Likely wrote: On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Hanjun Guo hanjun@linaro.org wrote: This

Re: [Linaro-acpi] [PATCH v7 00/17] Introduce ACPI for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1

2015-01-16 Thread Al Stone
On 01/16/2015 08:17 AM, Al Stone wrote: On 01/16/2015 03:20 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote: On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 09:31:53PM +, Al Stone wrote: On 01/15/2015 11:23 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote: On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 04:26:20PM +, Grant Likely wrote: On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Hanjun

Re: [Linaro-acpi] [PATCH v7 00/17] Introduce ACPI for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1

2015-01-16 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Friday 16 January 2015 16:40:28 Arnd Bergmann wrote: On Friday 16 January 2015 15:33:20 Will Deacon wrote: On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 03:14:13PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote: On Friday 16 January 2015 14:55:45 Will Deacon wrote: On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 02:45:30PM +, Tom Lendacky wrote:

Re: [Linaro-acpi] [PATCH v7 00/17] Introduce ACPI for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1

2015-01-16 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Friday 16 January 2015 15:49:13 Will Deacon wrote: The on-board ethernet on Seattle requires the driver to program its AXI attributes, so configuring it to be a coherent master actually means program the same cacheable AXI settings as you have on the CPU. That sounds like Linux should be

Re: [Linaro-acpi] [PATCH v7 00/17] Introduce ACPI for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1

2015-01-16 Thread Suravee Suthikulpanit
On 1/16/15 09:17, Al Stone wrote: On 01/16/2015 03:20 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote: On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 09:31:53PM +, Al Stone wrote: On 01/15/2015 11:23 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote: On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 04:26:20PM +, Grant Likely wrote: On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Hanjun