On Sat, 2007-09-15 at 01:43 +1000, Greg Banks wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 10:58:38AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > If Irix isn't clearing these bits
> > on a write then it might be good to see if they can fix that...
>
> I think first you'd have to mount a serious argument that it's broken,
On Sat, 2007-09-15 at 01:43 +1000, Greg Banks wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 10:58:38AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
If Irix isn't clearing these bits
on a write then it might be good to see if they can fix that...
I think first you'd have to mount a serious argument that it's broken,
more
On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 01:43:45 +1000
Greg Banks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 10:58:38AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 00:40:33 +1000
> > Greg Banks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Ok, you convinced me.
> >
> > Right. When I was first looking
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 10:58:38AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 00:40:33 +1000
> Greg Banks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > Ok, you convinced me.
>
> Right. When I was first looking at this, I considered some similar
> approaches, but hit roadblocks with all of them. The
On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 00:40:33 +1000
Greg Banks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 09:38:46AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 23:09:24 +1000
> > Greg Banks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 07:02:58AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > > >
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 09:38:46AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 23:09:24 +1000
> Greg Banks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 07:02:58AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > > On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 20:25:45 +1000
> > > Greg Banks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 23:09:24 +1000
Greg Banks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 07:02:58AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 20:25:45 +1000
> > Greg Banks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > I'm curious about the reasons behind this change. You mention
> > >
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 07:02:58AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 20:25:45 +1000
> Greg Banks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'm curious about the reasons behind this change. You mention
> > credential issues; how exactly is it that you have the correct creds
> > to perform a
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 20:25:45 +1000
Greg Banks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 10:37:04AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > If the ATTR_KILL_S*ID bits are set then any mode change is only for
> > clearing the setuid/setgid bits. For NFS skip the mode change and
> > let the server
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 10:37:04AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> If the ATTR_KILL_S*ID bits are set then any mode change is only for
> clearing the setuid/setgid bits. For NFS skip the mode change and
> let the server handle it.
You're assuming the server will remove setuid and setgid bits on
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 10:37:04AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
If the ATTR_KILL_S*ID bits are set then any mode change is only for
clearing the setuid/setgid bits. For NFS skip the mode change and
let the server handle it.
You're assuming the server will remove setuid and setgid bits on WRITE?
I
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 20:25:45 +1000
Greg Banks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 10:37:04AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
If the ATTR_KILL_S*ID bits are set then any mode change is only for
clearing the setuid/setgid bits. For NFS skip the mode change and
let the server handle
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 07:02:58AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 20:25:45 +1000
Greg Banks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm curious about the reasons behind this change. You mention
credential issues; how exactly is it that you have the correct creds
to perform a WRITE rpc
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 23:09:24 +1000
Greg Banks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 07:02:58AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 20:25:45 +1000
Greg Banks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm curious about the reasons behind this change. You mention
credential
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 09:38:46AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 23:09:24 +1000
Greg Banks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 07:02:58AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 20:25:45 +1000
Greg Banks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm curious
On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 00:40:33 +1000
Greg Banks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 09:38:46AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 23:09:24 +1000
Greg Banks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 07:02:58AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
On Fri, 14 Sep
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 10:58:38AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 00:40:33 +1000
Greg Banks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, you convinced me.
Right. When I was first looking at this, I considered some similar
approaches, but hit roadblocks with all of them. The only real
On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 01:43:45 +1000
Greg Banks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 10:58:38AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 00:40:33 +1000
Greg Banks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, you convinced me.
Right. When I was first looking at this, I considered
18 matches
Mail list logo
