Re: [Nouveau] REGRESSION: Kernel PANIC 8777c5c11764d8336d8270f96778158c34c92108 - drm/nouveau/dp: probe dpcd to determine connectedness

2014-06-17 Thread Andreas Tscharner
On 17.06.2014 07:39, Ben Skeggs wrote: [snip] In any case, I encountered the oops myself earlier (absolutely nothing to do with that commit) and fixed it here. I've sent it onto Dave for the next -fixes merge, so hopefully it'll help your case too. Has this anything to do with "Machine

Re: [Nouveau] REGRESSION: Kernel PANIC 8777c5c11764d8336d8270f96778158c34c92108 - drm/nouveau/dp: probe dpcd to determine connectedness

2014-06-17 Thread Andreas Tscharner
On 17.06.2014 07:39, Ben Skeggs wrote: [snip] In any case, I encountered the oops myself earlier (absolutely nothing to do with that commit) and fixed it here. I've sent it onto Dave for the next -fixes merge, so hopefully it'll help your case too. Has this anything to do with

Re: [Nouveau] REGRESSION: Kernel PANIC 8777c5c11764d8336d8270f96778158c34c92108 - drm/nouveau/dp: probe dpcd to determine connectedness

2014-06-16 Thread Thomas Glanzmann
Hello Ben, > > 8777c5c11764d8336d8270f96778158c34c92108 (which is mentioned as the > > first bad commit above...) is a tiny commit, so I have no idea what > > you mean by "too large for your taste". for example I would not export a symbol and do something else in the same commit, but would split

Re: [Nouveau] REGRESSION: Kernel PANIC 8777c5c11764d8336d8270f96778158c34c92108 - drm/nouveau/dp: probe dpcd to determine connectedness

2014-06-16 Thread Ben Skeggs
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Ben Skeggs wrote: > On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Thomas Glanzmann wrote: >> Hello Ben, >> >>> Are you able to double-check that bisect? I'm not at all sure how >>> that particular commit could trigger the issue you're seeing. Some of >>> the others,

Re: [Nouveau] REGRESSION: Kernel PANIC 8777c5c11764d8336d8270f96778158c34c92108 - drm/nouveau/dp: probe dpcd to determine connectedness

2014-06-16 Thread Ben Skeggs
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Thomas Glanzmann wrote: > Hello Ben, > >> Are you able to double-check that bisect? I'm not at all sure how >> that particular commit could trigger the issue you're seeing. Some of >> the others, certainly. It might be worth trying a couple of times >> before

Re: [Nouveau] REGRESSION: Kernel PANIC 8777c5c11764d8336d8270f96778158c34c92108 - drm/nouveau/dp: probe dpcd to determine connectedness

2014-06-16 Thread Thomas Glanzmann
Hello Ben, > Are you able to double-check that bisect? I'm not at all sure how > that particular commit could trigger the issue you're seeing. Some of > the others, certainly. It might be worth trying a couple of times > before marking something as "good", in case there's a timing aspect to >

Re: [Nouveau] REGRESSION: Kernel PANIC 8777c5c11764d8336d8270f96778158c34c92108 - drm/nouveau/dp: probe dpcd to determine connectedness

2014-06-16 Thread Thomas Glanzmann
Hello Ben, Are you able to double-check that bisect? I'm not at all sure how that particular commit could trigger the issue you're seeing. Some of the others, certainly. It might be worth trying a couple of times before marking something as good, in case there's a timing aspect to the

Re: [Nouveau] REGRESSION: Kernel PANIC 8777c5c11764d8336d8270f96778158c34c92108 - drm/nouveau/dp: probe dpcd to determine connectedness

2014-06-16 Thread Ben Skeggs
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Thomas Glanzmann tho...@glanzmann.de wrote: Hello Ben, Are you able to double-check that bisect? I'm not at all sure how that particular commit could trigger the issue you're seeing. Some of the others, certainly. It might be worth trying a couple of times

Re: [Nouveau] REGRESSION: Kernel PANIC 8777c5c11764d8336d8270f96778158c34c92108 - drm/nouveau/dp: probe dpcd to determine connectedness

2014-06-16 Thread Ben Skeggs
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Ben Skeggs skeg...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Thomas Glanzmann tho...@glanzmann.de wrote: Hello Ben, Are you able to double-check that bisect? I'm not at all sure how that particular commit could trigger the issue you're seeing. Some

Re: [Nouveau] REGRESSION: Kernel PANIC 8777c5c11764d8336d8270f96778158c34c92108 - drm/nouveau/dp: probe dpcd to determine connectedness

2014-06-16 Thread Thomas Glanzmann
Hello Ben, 8777c5c11764d8336d8270f96778158c34c92108 (which is mentioned as the first bad commit above...) is a tiny commit, so I have no idea what you mean by too large for your taste. for example I would not export a symbol and do something else in the same commit, but would split them up

Re: [Nouveau] REGRESSION: Kernel PANIC 8777c5c11764d8336d8270f96778158c34c92108 - drm/nouveau/dp: probe dpcd to determine connectedness

2014-06-15 Thread Ben Skeggs
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 7:58 PM, Thomas Glanzmann wrote: > Hello Ben, > commit Hey Thomas, Are you able to double-check that bisect? I'm not at all sure how that particular commit could trigger the issue you're seeing. Some of the others, certainly. It might be worth trying a couple of times

Re: [Nouveau] REGRESSION: Kernel PANIC 8777c5c11764d8336d8270f96778158c34c92108 - drm/nouveau/dp: probe dpcd to determine connectedness

2014-06-15 Thread Ben Skeggs
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 7:58 PM, Thomas Glanzmann tho...@glanzmann.de wrote: Hello Ben, commit Hey Thomas, Are you able to double-check that bisect? I'm not at all sure how that particular commit could trigger the issue you're seeing. Some of the others, certainly. It might be worth trying a