Timur Tabi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|> ** Reply to message from Stephen Satchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on
|> Tue, 24 Oct 2000 09:54:46 -0700
|>
|>
|> > Linus has the final say, of course, but to suggest that any changes that
|> > remove name collisions between C and C++ be rejected out of
** Reply to message from Stephen Satchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on
Tue, 24 Oct 2000 09:54:46 -0700
> Linus has the final say, of course, but to suggest that any changes that
> remove name collisions between C and C++ be rejected out of hand has the
> potential for shooting ourselves in the
At 04:37 PM 10/23/00 +0200, Marko Kreen wrote:
>* This will _not_ be accepted into standard codebase. Don't you
>understand? Making headers C++ compatible is the first tiny
>step for doing modules in C++. Yes, from driver/module
>programmers perspective "they almost look same, and
At 04:37 PM 10/23/00 +0200, Marko Kreen wrote:
* This will _not_ be accepted into standard codebase. Don't you
understand? Making headers C++ compatible is the first tiny
step for doing modules in C++. Yes, from driver/module
programmers perspective "they almost look same, and I
** Reply to message from Stephen Satchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] on
Tue, 24 Oct 2000 09:54:46 -0700
Linus has the final say, of course, but to suggest that any changes that
remove name collisions between C and C++ be rejected out of hand has the
potential for shooting ourselves in the foot.
Timur Tabi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| ** Reply to message from Stephen Satchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] on
| Tue, 24 Oct 2000 09:54:46 -0700
|
|
| Linus has the final say, of course, but to suggest that any changes that
| remove name collisions between C and C++ be rejected out of hand has the
6 matches
Mail list logo
