Re: [PATCH, for-next] pinctrl: fix mutex deadlock in get_pinctrl_dev_from_of_node()

On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 6:57 PM, Daniel Mack wrote: > This obvious bug was introduced by d755910b7 ("pinctrl: move subsystem > mutex to pinctrl_dev struct"). > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Mack Thanks, patch applied. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe

Re: [PATCH, for-next] pinctrl: fix mutex deadlock in get_pinctrl_dev_from_of_node()

On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 6:57 PM, Daniel Mack zon...@gmail.com wrote: This obvious bug was introduced by d755910b7 (pinctrl: move subsystem mutex to pinctrl_dev struct). Signed-off-by: Daniel Mack zon...@gmail.com Thanks, patch applied. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list:

[PATCH, for-next] pinctrl: fix mutex deadlock in get_pinctrl_dev_from_of_node()

This obvious bug was introduced by d755910b7 ("pinctrl: move subsystem mutex to pinctrl_dev struct"). Signed-off-by: Daniel Mack --- This applies on today's linux-next. drivers/pinctrl/core.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/core.c

[PATCH, for-next] pinctrl: fix mutex deadlock in get_pinctrl_dev_from_of_node()

This obvious bug was introduced by d755910b7 (pinctrl: move subsystem mutex to pinctrl_dev struct). Signed-off-by: Daniel Mack zon...@gmail.com --- This applies on today's linux-next. drivers/pinctrl/core.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git